Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Talking It Out: Political Conversation and Knowledge Gaps in Unequal Urban Contexts

  • Amy Erica Smith
Abstract

In many contemporary urban spaces, political information accrues to high status neighborhoods. This might exacerbate political inequality as the information-rich and information-poor each talk primarily with others like themselves. When information is specific and broadly diffused through the media, however, the convenience and low cognitive costs of everyday conversation could be especially helpful for the disadvantaged. This article shows how political conversations intensify or ameliorate spatial knowledge gaps, using a six-wave panel survey in fifty Brazilian neighborhoods between 2002 and 2006. Multilevel models demonstrate that conversation was more frequent in high education neighborhoods, but had a greater impact on specific, factual knowledge in low-education neighborhoods, leading to shrinking knowledge gaps. However, conversation slightly widened spatial gaps in socially perceived general knowledge.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Iowa State University (email: aesmith2@iastate.edu). This research was funded in part by a Mellon Fellowship and an NSF Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant. A previous version of the analysis was presented at the 2010 Networks in Political Science Conference at Duke University. Thanks to Barry Ames, Steve Finkel, Jonathan Hassid, Jon Hurwitz, Jay McCann, Scott Morgenstern, Dave Peterson, and Robert Urbatsch as well as to participants in the Duke conference for very helpful feedback. The first three wave of the data analyzed here were collected under a National Science Foundation grant to Professors Barry Ames, Andy Baker, and Lúcio Rennó, while Waves 4 through 6 were collected under the direction of Professor Barry Ames with the research funds from the University of Pittsburgh Andrew Mellon chair. I am grateful to Professor Ames for the use of the data from the latter waves. Data replication sets are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000721.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aguilar, Rosario, Cunow, Saul, Desposato, Scott, and Barone, Leonardo Sangali. 2015. Ballot Structure, Candidate Race, and Vote Choice in Brazil. Latin American Research Review 50 (3):175202.
Ahn, T. K., Huckfeldt, Robert, Mayer, Alexander K., and Barry Ryan, John. 2013. Expertise and Bias in Political Communication Networks. American Journal of Political Science 57 (2):357373.
Almeida, Alberto Carlos. 2006. Amnésia Eleitoral: Em Quem Você Votou para Deputado em 2002? E em 1998? Pp. 3446 in Reforma Política: Lições da História Recente, edited by Gláucio Ary Dillon Soares and Lúcio Rennó. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.
Almeida, Alberto Carlos. 2007. A Cabeça do Brasileiro, 2nd edn. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Record.
Ames, Barry. 1994. The Reverse Coattails Effect: Local Party Organization in the 1989 Brazilian Presidential Election. American Political Science Review 88 (1):95111.
Ames, Barry, and Smith, Amy Erica. 2010. Knowing Left from Right: Ideological Identification in Brazil, 2002–2006. Journal of Politics in Latin America 2 (3):338.
Ames, Barry, Miguel García, and Smith, Amy Erica. 2012. Keeping Up with the Souzas: Social Influence and Electoral Change in a Weak Party System, Brazil 2002–2006. Latin American Politics & Society 54 (2):5178.
Bailey, Stanley R. 2008. Unmixing for Race Making in Brazil. American Journal of Sociology 114 (3):577614.
Baker, Andy, Ames, Barry, and Rennó, Lúcio. 2006. Social Context and Campaign Volatility in New Democracies: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil’s 2002 Elections. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):382399.
Barabas, Jason. 2002. Another Look at the Measurement of Political Knowledge. Political Analysis 10 (2):209.
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science 40 (1):194230.
Bontempo, Robert, Lobel, Sharon, and Triandis, Harry. 1990. Compliance and Value Internalization in Brazil and the U.S. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21 (2):200213.
Caldeira, Teresa Pires do Rio. 1996. Fortified Enclaves: The New Urban Segregation. Public Culture 8 (2):303328.
Campbell, David E. 2008. Voice in the Classroom: How an Open Classroom Climate Fosters Political Engagement among Adolescents. Political Behavior 30:437454.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Pp. 75169 in Ideology and Discontent, edited by David Apter. London: Free Press of Glencoe.
De Boef, Suzanna, and Keele, Luke. 2008. Taking Time Seriously. American Journal of Political Science 52 (1):184200.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
Djupe, Paul A., and Sokhey, Anand Edward. 2014. The Distribution and Determinants of Socially Supplied Political Expertise. American Politics Research 42 (2):199225.
Donohue, George A., Tichenor, Phillip J., and Olien, Clarice N.. 1975. Mass Media and the Knowledge Gap: A Hypothesis Reconsidered. Communication Research 2 (1):323.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Druckman, James N. 2004. Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)Relevance of Framing Effects. American Political Science Review 98 (4):671686.
Druckman, James N., and Nelson, Kjersten R.. 2003. Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4):729745.
Ettema, James S., and Kline, F. Gerald. 1977. Deficits, Differences, and Ceilings Contingent Conditions for Understanding the Knowledge Gap. Communication Research 4 (2):179202.
Ettema, James S., James, W. Brown, and Russell, V. Luepker. 1983. Knowledge Gap Effects in a Health Information Campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly 47 (4):516527.
Eveland, William P. Jr., Hayes, Andrew F., Shah, Dhavan V., and Kwak, Nojin. 2005. Understanding the Relationship Between Communication and Political Knowledge: A Model Comparison Approach Using Panel Data. Political Communication 22 (4):423446.
Eveland, William P., and Scheufele, Dietram A.. 2000. Connecting News Media Use With Gaps in Knowledge and Participation. Political Communication 17 (3):215237.
Eveland, William P., and Thomson, Tiffany. 2006. Is It Talking, Thinking, or Both? A Lagged Dependent Variable Model of Discussion Effects on Political Knowledge. Journal of Communication 56 (3):523542.
Finkel, Steven E., and Smith, Amy Erica. 2011. Civic Education, Political Discussion, and the Social Transmission of Democratic Knowledge and Values in a New Democracy: Kenya 2002. American Journal of Political Science 55 (2):417435.
Fontes, Breno Augusto Souto-Maior, and Eichner, Klaus. 2004. A Formação do Capital Social em uma Comunidade de Baixa Renda. Redes: Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales 7 (2):4780.
Galston, William A. 2001. Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education. Annual Review of Political Science 4:217234.
Gay, Robert. 1999. The Broker and the Thief: A Parable (Reflections on Popular Politics in Brazil). Luso-Brazilian Review 36 (1):4970.
Gaziano, Cecilie. 1983. The Knowledge Gap: An Analytical Review of Media Effects. Communication Research 10 (4):447486.
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Genova, Bistravapka K. L., and Greenberg, Bradley S.. 1979. Interests in News and the Knowledge Gap. Public Opinion Quarterly 43 (1):7991.
Gordon, Stacy B., and Segura, Gary M.. 1997. Cross National Variation in the Political Sophistication of Individuals: Capability or Choice. Journal of Politics 59 (1):126147.
Grabe, Maria Elizabeth, Lang, Annie, Zhou, Shuhua, and Bolls, Paul David. 2000. Cognitive Access to Negatively Arousing News: An Experimental Investigation of the Knowledge Gap. Communication Research 27 (1):326.
Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2002. Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap. Political Communication 19 (4):437454.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John. 2002. Political Environments, Political Dynamics, and the Survival of Disagreement. Journal of Politics 64 (1):121.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks . New York: Cambridge University Press.
Humphreys, Macartan, Masters, William A., and Sandbu, Martin E.. 2007. The Role of Leaders in Democratic Deliberations: Results from a Field Experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe. World Politics 58 (4):583622.
Jackman, Simon, and Sniderman, Paul M.. 2006. The Limits of Deliberative Discussion: A Model of Everyday Political Arguments. Journal of Politics 68 (2):272283.
Jennings, M. Kent. 1996. Political Knowledge over Time and across Generations. Public Opinion Quarterly 60:228252.
Jerit, Jennifer. 2009. Understanding the Knowledge Gap: The Role of Experts and Journalists. Journal of Politics 71 (2):442456.
Kinzo, Maria D’Alva. 2004. Partidos, Eleições e Democracia no Brasil Pós-1985. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 19 (54):2340.
Kinzo, Maria D’Alva. 2005. Os Partidos no Eleitorado: Percepções Públicas e Laços Partidários no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 20 (57):6581.
Klofstad, Casey A. 2011. Civic Talk: Peers, Politics, and the Future of Democracy. Philadelphia, Penn.: Temple University Press.
Kwak, Nojin. 1999. Revisiting the Knowledge Gap Hypothesis Education, Motivation, and Media Use. Communication Research 26 (4):385413.
Kwak, Nojin, Willlams, Ann E., Wang, Xiaoru, and Lee, Hoon. 2005. Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships Between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement. Communication Research 32 (1):87111.
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision-Making. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4):951971.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard R., and Gaudet, Hazel. 1948. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lup, Oana. 2010. The Role of Political Discussion in Developing Democracies: Evidence from Hungary. Pp, 183200 in Political Discussion in Modern Democracies: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Michael R. Wolf, Laura Morales and Ken’ichi Ikeda. London: Routledge.
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. American Political Science Review 88 (1):6376.
Makse, Todd, and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2010. Revisiting the Divisive Primary Hypothesis: 2008 and the Clinton–Obama Nomination Battle. American Politics Research 38 (2):233265.
Maldonado, Arturo. 2011. Compulsory Voting and the Decision to Vote. 63. AmericasBarometer Insights. Latin American Public Opinion Project, Vanderbilt University.
Marques, Eduardo Cesar. 2009a. As Redes Importam Para o Acesso a Bens e Serviços Obtidos Fora de Mercados? Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 24, 71:2540.
Marques, Eduardo Cesar. 2009b. As Redes Sociais Importam para a Pobreza Urbana? Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais 52 (2):471505.
Marques, Eduardo Cesar, Scalon, Celi, and Oliveira, Maria Aparecida. 2008. Comparando Estruturas Sociais no Rio de Janeiro e em São Paulo. Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais 51 (1):215238.
McCann, James A., and Lawson, Chappell. 2006. Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap in Three Transitional Democracies. Political Research Quarterly 59 (1):1322.
McClurg, Scott D. 2003. Social Networks and Political Participation: The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation. Political Research Quarterly 56 (4):449464.
McClurg, Scott D. 2006. The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):737754.
Moore, David W. 1987. Political Campaigns and the Knowledge-Gap Hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly 51 (2):186200.
Morales, Laura. 2010. Getting a Single Message? The Impact of Homogeneous Political Communication Contexts in Spain in a Comparative Perspective. Pp, 201222 in Political Discussion in Modern Democracies: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Michael R. Wolf, Laura Morales and Ken’ichi Ikeda. London: Routledge.
Mutz, Diana. 2002a. The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science 46 (4):838855.
Mutz, Diana. 2002b. Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice. American Political Science Review 96 (1):111126.
Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nickerson, David W. 2008. Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments. American Political Science Review 102 (1):4957.
Pan, Zhongdang, Shen, Lijian, Paek, Hye-Jin, and Sun, Ye. 2006. Mobilizing Political Talk in a Presidential Campaign: An Examination of Campaign Effects in a Deliberative Framework. Communication Research 33 (5):315345.
Pingree, Raymond J. 2007. How Messages Affect Their Senders: A More General Model of Message Effects and Implications for Deliberation. Communication Theory 17:439461.
Plutzer, Eric. 2002. Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood. American Political Science Review 96 (1):4156.
Power, Timothy J. 2009. Compulsory for Whom? Mandatory Voting and Electoral Participation in Brazil, 1986–2006. Journal of Politics in Latin America 1 (1):97122.
Price, Vincent, Cappella, Joseph N., and Nir, Lilach. 2002. Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? Political Communication 19 (1):95112.
Prior, Markus. 2005. News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3):577592.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rennó, Lúcio. 2006. O Dilema do Rico: Número de Candidatos, Identificação Partidária e Accountability nas Eleições de 2002 Para a Câmara Dos Deputados. Pp. 4768 in Reforma Política: Lições da História Recente, edited by Gláucio Ary Dillon Soares and Lúcio Rennó. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.
Richey, Sean. 2008. The Social Basis of Voting Correctly. Political Communication 25:366376.
Ryan, John Barry. 2011. Social Networks as a Shortcut to Correct Voting. American Journal of Political Science 55 (4):753766.
Singh, Shane. 2011. How Compelling is Compulsory Voting? A Multilevel Analysis of Turnout. Political Behavior 33 (1):95111.
Sokhey, Anand Edward, and McClurg, Scott D.. 2012. Social Networks and Correct Voting. Journal of Politics 74 (3):751764.
Stoker, Laura, and Jennings, M. Kent. 2005. Political Similarity and Influence between Husbands and Wives. In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, edited by Alan S. Zuckerman. Philadelphia, Penn.: Temple University Press.
Telles, Edward Eric. 2004. Race in Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Tichenor, Phillip J., Donohue, George A., and Olien, Clarice N.. 1970. Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 34 (2):159170.
Toka, Gabor. 2010. The Impact of Everyday Political Talk on Involvement, Knowledge, and Informed Voting. Pp, 129144 in Political Discussion in Modern Democracies: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Michael R. Wolf, Laura Morales and Ken’ichi Ikeda. London: Routledge.
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2004. Talking About Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Smith supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (104 KB)
104 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed