Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism

Abstract

The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism has generated wide interest. This article reviews three prominent books on authoritarian institutions and their central theoretical propositions about the origins, functions and effects of dominant party institutions on authoritarian rule. Two critical perspectives on political institutions, one based on rationalist theories of institutional design and the other based on a social conflict theory of political economy, suggest that authoritarian institutions are epiphenomenal on more fundamental political, social and/or economic relations. Such approaches have been largely ignored in this recent literature, but each calls into question the theoretical and empirical claims that form the basis of institutionalist approaches to authoritarian rule. A central implication of this article is that authoritarian institutions cannot be studied separately from the concrete problems of redistribution and policy making that motivate regime behavior.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Department of Government, Cornell University (email pepinsky@cornell.edu). An earlier version was presented at the conference How Autocracies Work: Beyond the Electoral Paradigm, University of Michigan. Thanks to Val Bunce, Bill Case, Anna Grzymala-Busse, Allen Hicken, Kevin Morrison, Dick Robison and Garry Rodan for helpful comments and discussion. All errors are my own.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
AcemogluDaron, EgorovGeorgy SoninKonstantin. 2009. Coalition Formation in Non-Democracies. Review of Economic Studies 75:9871009.
AlesinaAlberto, OzlerSule, RoubiniNouriel SwagelPhillip. 1996. Political Instability and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 1:189212.
BoixCarles, SvolikMilan W.. 2010.The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions and Power-sharing in Dictatorships. Working paper. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1352065, accessed 16 December 2012.
BrownleeJason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
BrownleeJason. 2009. Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affect Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science 53:515532.
BunceValerie. 1999. Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
CalvertRandall. 1995. Rational Actors, Equilibrium, and Social Institutions. In Explaining Social Institutions, edited by Jack Knight and Itai Sened, 5795. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
CollierDavid, LaPorteJody SeawrightJason. 2012. Putting Typologies to Work: Concept-Formation, Measurement, and Analytic Rigor. Political Research Quarterly 65:217232.
Diaz-CayerosAlberto, MagaloniBeatriz WeingastBarry R.. 2001. Tragic Brilliance: Equilibrium Party Hegemony in Mexico. Manuscript, Hoover Institute.
EasterlyWilliam LevineRoss. 1997. Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 12:12031250.
FishM. Steven. 2002. Islam and Authoritarianism. World Politics 55:437.
FunstonN.J. 1980. Malay Politics in Malaysia: A Study of the United Malays National Organisation and Party Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Educational Books.
GandhiJennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
GandhiJennifer Lust-OkarEllen. 2009. Elections Under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 2:403422.
GeddesBarbara. 1999. What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2:115144.
GeddesBarbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
GohCheng Teik. 1971. The May Thirteenth Incident and Democracy in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
GreeneKenneth F. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
HallPeter A. TaylorRosemary C.R.. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44:936957.
HuntingtonSamuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
JayasuriyaKanishka RodanGarry. 2007. Beyond Hybrid Regimes: More Participation, Less Contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization 14:773794.
LeeDong-Wook. 2009. Does Institutionalized Cooperation under Dictatorships Breed Good Economic Performance? Bring Regime Classifications Back In. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 4, 2009.
LeeMyoung-Jae. 2003. Exclusion Bias in Sample-Selection Model Estimators. Japanese Economic Review 54:229236.
MagaloniBeatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MagaloniBeatriz. 2008. Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule. Comparative Political Studies 41:715741.
MagaloniBeatriz KricheliRuth. 2010. Political Order and One Party Rule. Annual Review of Political Science 13:123143.
MainBrian G.M. ReillyBarry. 1993. The Employer Size-Wage Gap: Evidence for Britain. Economica 60:125142.
MaleskyEdmund J. SchulerPaul. 2010. Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review 104:121.
MaleskyEdmund J., AbramiRegina M. ZhengYu. 2011. Institutions and Inequality in Single-Party Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Vietnam and China. Comparative Politics 43:409427.
MilibandRalph. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.
MilnerHelen V. MukherjeeBumba. 2009. Democratization and Economic Globalization. Annual Review of Political Science 12:163181.
NorthDouglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
PepinskyThomas B. 2009. Economic Crises and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
PerssonTorsten TabelliniGuido. 1994. Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? American Economic Review 84:600621.
PiersonPaul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94:251267.
RasiahRajah SchmidtJohannes Dragsbaek, eds. 2008. The New Political Economy of Southeast Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Alger.
RikerWilliam H. 1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. American Political Science Review 74:432446.
RodanGarry, HewisonKevin RobisonRichard, eds. 2001. The Political Economy of South-East Asia: Conflict, Crises and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RodanGarry JayasuriyaKanishka. 2012. Hybrid Regimes: A Social Foundations Approach. In Hybrid Regimes: A Social Foundations Approach, edited by Jeffrey Haynes, 175189. London: Routledge.
SachsJeffrey D. WarnerAndrew M.. 2001. Natural Resources and Economic Development: The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review 45:827838.
SangmpamS.N. 2007. Politics Rules: The False Primacy of Institutions in Developing Countries. Political Studies 55:201224.
ShepsleKenneth A. 1986. Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions. In Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions, edited by Herbert F. Weisberg, 5182. New York: Agathon.
ShepsleKenneth A. 2006. Old Questions and New Answers about Institutions: The Riker Objection Revisited. In Old Questions and New Answers about Institutions: The Riker Objection Revisited, edited by Barry R. Weingast and Donald A. Wittman, 10311049. New York: Oxford University Press.
ShepsleKenneth A. 2010. The Rules of the Game: What Rules? Which Game? Paper presented at the Conference on the Legacy and Work of Douglass C. North, St. Louis, MO. Available from http://scholar.harvard.edu/kshepsle/files/north_paper_2010.pdf, accessed 16 December 2012.
SlaterDan. 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
SmithBenjamin. 2005. Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule. World Politics 57:421451.
SvolikMilan W. 2009. Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 53:477494.
ThelenKathleen. 1999. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:369404.
von VorysKarl. 1975. Democracy without Consensus: Communalism and Political Stability in Malaysia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
WeeksJessica L. 2008. Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization 62:3564.
WrightJoseph. 2008. Do Authoritarian Political Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science 52:322343.
ZainonAhmad PhangLew-Ann. 2005. The All-Powerful Executive. The Sun, 1 October.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 34
Total number of PDF views: 817 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1685 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.