Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Micro-Foundations of Party Competition and Issue Ownership: The Reciprocal Effects of Citizens’ Issue Salience and Party Attachments

Abstract

While previous research on the reciprocal effects of citizens’ issue attitudes and their party support emphasize citizens’ issue positions, political competition revolves equally around issue salience – that is, debates over which issue areas political parties should prioritize. Using multi-wave panel survey data from Germany and Great Britain, this study analyzes the reciprocal effects of citizens’ issue salience and their party support, and concludes that citizens’ issue priorities both influence and are influenced by their party attachments and, moreover, that these effects are linked to parties’ long-term associative issue ownership. This effect is strongest among supporters of a small issue-orientated niche party, the German Greens.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham (email: anja.neundorf@nottingham.ac.uk); Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis (email: jfadams@ucdavis.edu). The authors greatly appreciate the advice and comments of BJPS Editor Robert Johns and the anonymous reviewers. They also wish to acknowledge advice or feedback from Debra Leiter, Sergi Pardos-Prado, Romain Lachat and Markus Wagner. They further acknowledge helpful feedback from seminar and conference participants at the University of Oxford, Pompeu Fabra University, and the 2014 meetings of the European Political Science Association (in Edinburgh, UK) and the American Political Science Association (Washington, DC, USA). Online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123415000642, and data replication sets are available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS. The data used in this article cannot be deposited online, but are freely available to registered users. The data of the German Socio-Economic Panel can be requested via http://www.diw.de/en/diw_02.c.222836.en/access.html. We use version 24 (DOI: 10.5684/soep.v24). The data of the British Household Panel Study can be requested via http://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/series/?sn=20000.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
AdamsJames, EzrowLawrence, and LeiterDebra. 2012. Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe. Western European Politics 35 (6):12721294.
AdamsJames, EzrowLawrence, and Somer-TopcuZeynep. 2011. Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Statements During Elections. American Journal of Political Science 55 (2):370382.
AdamsJames, ClarkMichael, EzrowLawrence, and GlasgowGarrett. 2006. Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):513529.
AdamsJames, and Somer-TopcuZeynep. 2009. Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties’ Policy Shifts in Twenty-Five Postwar Democracies. Journal of Politics 71 (2):678692.
BaumgartnerFrank, BreunigChristian, Green-PedersenChristoffer, JonesBryan, MortensenPeter, NeytemansMichael, and WalgraveStefaan. 2009. Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective. American Journal of Political Science 53 (3):602619.
BelangerEric, and MeguidBonnie M.. 2008. Issue Saliency, Issue Ownership, and Issue-based Vote Choice. Electoral Studies 27 (3):477491.
BenoitKenneth, and LaverMichael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
BudgeIan, and FarlieDennis. 1983. Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: Georg Allen and Urwin.
BudgeIan, KlingemannHans-Dieter, VolkensAndrea, BaraJudith, and TanenbaumEric, eds. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CampbellAngus, ConversePhilip E., MillerWarren E., and StrokesDonald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
CarseyThomas, and LaymanGeoffrey. 2006. Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):464477.
ClarkeHarold D., and McCutcheonAllan L.. 2009. The Dynamics of Party Identification Reconsidered. Public Opinion Quarterly 2 (1):125.
ClarkeHarold D., SandersDavid, StewartMarianne C., and WhiteleyPaul M.. 2009. Performance Politics and the British Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DanceyLogan, and GorenPaul. 2010. Party Identification, Issue Attitudes, and the Dynamics of Political Debate. American Journal of Political Science 54 (3):686699.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.
EvansGeoffrey, and AndersenRobert. 2004. Do Issues Decide? Partisan Conditioning and Perceptions of Party Issue Positions Across the Electoral Cycle. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 14 (1):1839.
FiorinaMorris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
GorenPaul. 2005. Party Identification and Core Political Values. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3):881896.
GreenDonald P., PalmquistBradley, and SchicklerEric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
GreenJane, and HoboltSara B.. 2008. Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections. Electoral Studies 27 (3):460476.
Haisken-DeNewJohn, and FrickJoachim. 2005. Desktop Companion to the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (GSOEP). Technical Report. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
HetheringtonMarc J. 2001. Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization. American Political Science Review 95 (3):619631.
HoboltSara, KlemmensenRobert, and PickupMark. 2008. The Dynamics of Issue Diversity in Party Rhetoric. Paper presented at APSA 2008, 28 August, Boston, Massachusetts.
KitscheltHerbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
KlingemannHans-Dieter, HofferbertRichard I., and BudgeIan. 1994. Parties, Policies and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
KrohMartin. 2014. Growth Trajectories in the Strength of Party Identification: The Legacy of Autocratic Regimes. Electoral Studies 33 (1):90101.
MeguidBonnie. 2008. Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MilazzoCaitlin, AdamsJames, and GreenJane. 2012. Are Voter Decision Rules Endogenous to Parties’ Policy Strategies? A Model with Applications to Elite Depolarization in Post-Thatcher Britain. Journal of Politics 74 (2):262276.
NeundorfAnja. 2009. Growing Up On Different Sides of the Wall: A Quasi-Experimental Test – Applying the Left-Right Dimension to the German Mass Public. German Politics 18 (2):201225.
NeundorfAnja, StegmuellerDaniel, and ScottoThomas J.. 2011. The Individual Level Dynamics of Bounded Partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3):458482.
PageBenjamin I., and JonesCalvin C.. 1979. Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote. American Political Science Review 73 (4):10711089.
PageBenjamin I., and ShapiroRobert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
PappiFranz Urban, ShikanoSusumu, and BytzekEvelyn. 2004. Der Einfluss politischer Ereignisse auf die Popularität von Parteien und Politikern und auf das Parteiensystem. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologieund Sozialpsychologie 56 (1):5170.
Pardos-PradoSergi, LanceeBram, and SagarzazuInaki. 2014. Immigration and Electoral Change in Mainstream Political Space. Political Behavior 36 (4):847875.
Pardos-PradoSergi, and DinasElias. 2010. Systemic Polarization and Spatial Voting. European Journal of Political Research 49:759786.
PetrocikJohn R. 1996. Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4):825850.
PoguntkeThomas. 1993. Alternative Politics: The German Green Party. Environment, Politics and Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
SpoonJae-Jae. 2011. Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe. Ann. Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
StubagerRune, and SlothuusRune. 2013. What Are the Sources of Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? Testing Four Explanations at the Individual Level. Political Behavior 35 (3):567588.
TarrowSidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
TreschAnke, LefevereJonas, and WalgraveStefaan. 2013. Steal Me If You Can!: The Impact of Campaign Messages on Associative Issue Ownership. Party Politics 21 (2):198208.
van der BrugWouter. 2004. Issue Ownership and Party Choice. Electoral Studies 23 (2):209233.
VermuntJeroen K., and MagidsonJay. 2008. LG-Syntax User’s Guide: Manual for Latent GOLD 4.5 Syntax Module. Belmont: Statistical Innovations Inc.
WagnerGert, FrickJoachim, and SchuppJuergen. 2007. The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) – Scope, Evolution and Enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch 127 (1):139169.
WagnerMarkus. 2012. Defining and Measuring Niche Parties. Party Politics 18 (6):845864.
WalgraveStefaan, LefevereJonas, and TreschAnke. 2012. The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (4):771782.
WalgraveStefaan, LefevereJonas, and TreschAnke. 2014. The Limits of Issue Ownership Dynamics: The Constraining Effect of Party Preference. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 21 (1):119.
WalgraveStefaan, and De SwertKnut. 2007. Where Does Issue Ownership Come From? From the Party or From the Media? Issue-Party Identifications in Belgium (1991–2005). Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 12 (1):3767.
WlezienChristopher. 2005. On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem’. Electoral Studies 24 (4):555579.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Neundorf and Adams supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (839 KB)
839 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 156 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 581 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.