Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Micro-Foundations of Party Competition and Issue Ownership: The Reciprocal Effects of Citizens’ Issue Salience and Party Attachments

Abstract

While previous research on the reciprocal effects of citizens’ issue attitudes and their party support emphasize citizens’ issue positions, political competition revolves equally around issue salience – that is, debates over which issue areas political parties should prioritize. Using multi-wave panel survey data from Germany and Great Britain, this study analyzes the reciprocal effects of citizens’ issue salience and their party support, and concludes that citizens’ issue priorities both influence and are influenced by their party attachments and, moreover, that these effects are linked to parties’ long-term associative issue ownership. This effect is strongest among supporters of a small issue-orientated niche party, the German Greens.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham (email: anja.neundorf@nottingham.ac.uk); Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis (email: jfadams@ucdavis.edu). The authors greatly appreciate the advice and comments of BJPS Editor Robert Johns and the anonymous reviewers. They also wish to acknowledge advice or feedback from Debra Leiter, Sergi Pardos-Prado, Romain Lachat and Markus Wagner. They further acknowledge helpful feedback from seminar and conference participants at the University of Oxford, Pompeu Fabra University, and the 2014 meetings of the European Political Science Association (in Edinburgh, UK) and the American Political Science Association (Washington, DC, USA). Online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123415000642, and data replication sets are available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS. The data used in this article cannot be deposited online, but are freely available to registered users. The data of the German Socio-Economic Panel can be requested via http://www.diw.de/en/diw_02.c.222836.en/access.html. We use version 24 (DOI: 10.5684/soep.v24). The data of the British Household Panel Study can be requested via http://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/series/?sn=20000.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

JamesAdams , LawrenceEzrow , and DebraLeiter . 2012. Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe. Western European Politics 35 (6):12721294.

JamesAdams , LawrenceEzrow , and ZeynepSomer-Topcu . 2011. Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Statements During Elections. American Journal of Political Science 55 (2):370382.

JamesAdams , MichaelClark , LawrenceEzrow , and GarrettGlasgow . 2006. Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):513529.

JamesAdams , and ZeynepSomer-Topcu . 2009. Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties’ Policy Shifts in Twenty-Five Postwar Democracies. Journal of Politics 71 (2):678692.

FrankBaumgartner , ChristianBreunig , ChristofferGreen-Pedersen , BryanJones , PeterMortensen , MichaelNeytemans , and StefaanWalgrave . 2009. Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective. American Journal of Political Science 53 (3):602619.

EricBelanger , and Bonnie M.Meguid . 2008. Issue Saliency, Issue Ownership, and Issue-based Vote Choice. Electoral Studies 27 (3):477491.

ThomasCarsey , and GeoffreyLayman . 2006. Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):464477.

Harold D.Clarke , DavidSanders , Marianne C.Stewart , and Paul M.Whiteley . 2009. Performance Politics and the British Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.

LoganDancey , and PaulGoren . 2010. Party Identification, Issue Attitudes, and the Dynamics of Political Debate. American Journal of Political Science 54 (3):686699.

GeoffreyEvans , and RobertAndersen . 2004. Do Issues Decide? Partisan Conditioning and Perceptions of Party Issue Positions Across the Electoral Cycle. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 14 (1):1839.

PaulGoren . 2005. Party Identification and Core Political Values. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3):881896.

JaneGreen , and Sara B.Hobolt . 2008. Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections. Electoral Studies 27 (3):460476.

HerbertKitschelt . 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hans-DieterKlingemann , Richard I.Hofferbert , and IanBudge . 1994. Parties, Policies and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

MartinKroh . 2014. Growth Trajectories in the Strength of Party Identification: The Legacy of Autocratic Regimes. Electoral Studies 33 (1):90101.

BonnieMeguid . 2008. Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

CaitlinMilazzo , JamesAdams , and JaneGreen . 2012. Are Voter Decision Rules Endogenous to Parties’ Policy Strategies? A Model with Applications to Elite Depolarization in Post-Thatcher Britain. Journal of Politics 74 (2):262276.

AnjaNeundorf . 2009. Growing Up On Different Sides of the Wall: A Quasi-Experimental Test – Applying the Left-Right Dimension to the German Mass Public. German Politics 18 (2):201225.

AnjaNeundorf , DanielStegmueller , and Thomas J.Scotto . 2011. The Individual Level Dynamics of Bounded Partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3):458482.

Benjamin I.Page , and Robert Y.Shapiro . 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Franz UrbanPappi , SusumuShikano , and EvelynBytzek . 2004. Der Einfluss politischer Ereignisse auf die Popularität von Parteien und Politikern und auf das Parteiensystem. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologieund Sozialpsychologie 56 (1):5170.

SergiPardos-Prado , BramLancee , and InakiSagarzazu . 2014. Immigration and Electoral Change in Mainstream Political Space. Political Behavior 36 (4):847875.

SergiPardos-Prado , and EliasDinas . 2010. Systemic Polarization and Spatial Voting. European Journal of Political Research 49:759786.

RuneStubager , and RuneSlothuus . 2013. What Are the Sources of Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? Testing Four Explanations at the Individual Level. Political Behavior 35 (3):567588.

AnkeTresch , JonasLefevere , and StefaanWalgrave . 2013. Steal Me If You Can!: The Impact of Campaign Messages on Associative Issue Ownership. Party Politics 21 (2):198208.

Woutervan der Brug . 2004. Issue Ownership and Party Choice. Electoral Studies 23 (2):209233.

MarkusWagner . 2012. Defining and Measuring Niche Parties. Party Politics 18 (6):845864.

StefaanWalgrave , JonasLefevere , and AnkeTresch . 2012. The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (4):771782.

StefaanWalgrave , and KnutDe Swert . 2007. Where Does Issue Ownership Come From? From the Party or From the Media? Issue-Party Identifications in Belgium (1991–2005). Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 12 (1):3767.

ChristopherWlezien . 2005. On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem’. Electoral Studies 24 (4):555579.

JohnZaller . 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Neundorf and Adams supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF

Metrics

Altmetric attention score