Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 130
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ahmadjian, Christina L. 2016. Comparative Institutional Analysis and Institutional Complexity. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 12.

    Baldi, Guido 2016. Fiscal policy rules, budget deficits, and forecasting biases. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 185.

    Beckmann, Joscha Endrichs, Marek and Schweickert, Rainer 2016. Government activity and economic growth – one size fits All?. International Economics and Economic Policy, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 429.

    Behrens, Martin and Helfen, Markus 2016. The Foundations of Social Partnership. British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 54, Issue. 2, p. 334.

    Belanès, Amel and Saihi, Malek 2016. Evidence on complementarity and substitution contingency in monitoring and bonding mechanisms. Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 38, p. 161.

    Busemeyer, Marius R. and Vossiek, Janis 2016. The Handbook of Global Education Policy.

    Ćetković, Stefan and Buzogány, Aron 2016. Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics. Climate Policy, Vol. 16, Issue. 5, p. 642.

    CLEMENT, JESSICA 2016. Electoral rule choice in transitional economies. Journal of Institutional Economics, p. 1.

    De Ville, Ferdi and Vermeiren, Mattias 2016. Rising Powers and Economic Crisis in the Euro Area.

    Diebecker, Jan and Sommer, Friedrich 2016. The impact of corporate sustainability performance on information asymmetry: the role of institutional differences. Review of Managerial Science,

    Duvanova, Dinissa 2016. Delegation of Political Authority to Bureaucratic Agencies in an Authoritarian Regime: An Analysis of Regional Economic Regulation in Kazakhstan. Studies in Comparative International Development,

    Ehnert, Ina Parsa, Sepideh Roper, Ian Wagner, Marcus and Muller-Camen, Michael 2016. Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 88.

    Fainshmidt, Stav Judge, William Q. Aguilera, Ruth V. and Smith, Adam 2016. Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries. Journal of World Business,

    Favotto, Alvise Kollman, Kelly and Bernhagen, Patrick 2016. Engaging firms: The global organisational field for corporate social responsibility and national varieties of capitalism. Policy and Society, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 13.

    Geary, John and Aguzzoli, Roberta 2016. Miners, politics and institutional caryatids: Accounting for the transfer of HRM practices in the Brazilian multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies,

    Glassmann, Ulrich 2016. Social Rights, Family Networks and Regional Varieties of Capitalism in Mediterranean Countries. Regional Studies, Vol. 50, Issue. 1, p. 35.

    Jahn, Detlef 2016. Changing of the guard: trends in corporatist arrangements in 42 highly industrialized societies from 1960 to 2010. Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 47.

    Jones, Chris and Temouri, Yama 2016. The determinants of tax haven FDI. Journal of World Business, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 237.

    Keating, Daniel P. 2016. Equity and Justice in Developmental Science: Theoretical and Methodological Issues.

    Landini, Fabio and Pagano, Ugo 2016. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics.


Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis


This article provides a statistical analysis of core contentions of the ‘varieties of capitalism’ perspective on comparative capitalism. The authors construct indices to assess whether patterns of co-ordination in the OECD economies conform to the predictions of the theory and compare the correspondence of institutions across subspheres of the political economy. They test whether institutional complementarities occur across these subspheres by estimating the impact of complementarities in labour relations and corporate governance on growth rates. To assess the durability of varieties of capitalism, they report on the extent of institutional change in the 1980s and 1990s. Powerful interaction effects across institutions in the subspheres of the political economy must be considered if assessments of the economic impact of institutional reform in any one sphere are to be accurate.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *