Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Why Do Citizens Discount the Future? Public Opinion and the Timing of Policy Consequences


It is widely assumed that citizens are myopic, weighing policies’ short-term consequences more heavily than long-term outcomes. Yet no study of public opinion has directly examined whether or why the timing of future policy consequences shapes citizens’ policy attitudes. This article reports the results of an experiment designed to test for the presence and mechanisms of time-discounting in the mass public. The analysis yields evidence of significant discounting of delayed policy benefits and indicates that citizens’ policy bias towards the present derives in large part from uncertainty about the long term: uncertainty about both long-run processes of policy causation and long-term political commitments. There is, in contrast, little evidence that positive time-preferences (impatience) or consumption-smoothing are significant sources of myopic policy attitudes.

Hide All

Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia (email:; and Department of Political Studies, Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, respectively. The authors acknowledge the generous support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (#410-2006-1174) and the UBC Hampton Fund. For detailed comments on the paper or study protocol, we thank John Bullock, Fred Cutler, Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant, Benjamin Nyblade, Andrew Owen, Dimitrios Panagos, Paul Quirk, and the journal's three anonymous reviewers. We also received helpful advice from Jason Barabas, Mick Couper, Brian Gaines, Donald Green, Sunshine Hillygus, Donald P. Haider-Markel, Simon Jackman, Richard Johnston, Jeffrey Mondak, Angela O'Mahony, Diana Mutz and Nicholas Winter. For superb research assistance, we thank Nico Dragojlovic, Anna Drake and Steven Klein. A Supplementary Appendix containing additional information is available online at:

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

William D. Nordhaus , ‘The Political Business Cycle’, Review of Economic Studies, 42 (1975), 169190

Alberto Alesina and Nouriel Roubini , ‘Political Cycles in OECD Economies’, Review of Economic Studies, 59 (1992), 663688

Michael Lewis-Beck , ‘Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy’, American Journal of Political Science, 30 (1986), 315346

Robert S. Erikson , Michael B. MacKuen and James A. Stimson , ‘Bankers or Peasants Revisited: Economic Expectations and Presidential Approval’, Electoral Studies, 19 (2000), 295312

Adam S. Booij and Bernard M. S. van Praag, ‘A Simultaneous Approach to the Estimation of Risk Aversion and the Subjective Time Discount Rate’, Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 70 (2009), 374388

Tullio Japelli and Luigi Pistaferri , ‘Intertemporal Choice and Consumption Mobility’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4 (2006), 75115

Barry R. Weingast and William J. Marshall , ‘The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets’, Journal of Political Economy, 96 (1988), 132163

Evelyne Huber and John D. Stephens , Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001)

Susan C. Stokes , ‘Public Opinion and Market Reforms: The Limits of Economic Voting’, Comparative Political Studies, 29 (1996), 499519

Laurie A. Rhodebeck , ‘The Politics of Greed? Political Preferences among the Elderly’, Journal of Politics 55 (1993), 342364

Dennis Chong , Jack Citrin and Patricia Conley , ‘When Self-Interest Matters’, Political Psychology, 22 (2001), 541570

Jon Krosnick et al., ‘The Origins and Consequences of Democratic Citizens’ Policy Agendas: A Study of Popular Concern About Global Warming’, Climatic Change, 77 (2006), 743

William B. Walstad , ‘The Effect of Economic Knowledge on Public Opinion of Economic Issues’, Journal of Economic Education, 28 (1997), 195205

Paul A. Samuelson , ‘A Note on Measurement of Utility’, Review of Economic Studies, 4 (1937), 155161

Gideon Keren and Peter Roelofsma , ‘Immediacy and Certainty in Intertemporal Choice’, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 63 (1995), 287297

Yoram Halevy , ‘Strotz Meets Allais: Diminishing Impatience and the Certainty Effect’, American Economic Review, 98 (2008), 11451162

Roos Vonk , ‘The Negativity Effect in Trait Ratings and in Open-Ended Descriptions of Persons’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 (1993), 269278

Richard R. Lau , ‘Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behaviour’, American Journal of Political Science, 29 (1985), 119138

Jill G. Klein , ‘Negativity Effects in Impression Formation: A Test in the Political Arena’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17 (1991), 412418

Leigh Ann Vaughn and Gifford Weary , ‘Roles of the Availability of Explanations, Feelings of Ease, and Dysphoria in Judgments About the Future’, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21 (2002), 686704

Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman , ‘Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency’, Cognitive Psychology 5 (1973), 207232

Uri Gneezy , John A. List and George Wu , ‘The Uncertainty Effect: When a Risky Prospect Is Valued Less Than Its Worst Possible Outcome’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 (2006), 12831309

Alberto Alesina and Guido Tabellini , ‘Credibility and Politics’, European Economic Review, 32 (1988), 542550

Torsten Persson and Guido Tabellini , ‘Representative Democracy and Capital Taxation’, Journal of Public Economics, 55 (1994), 5370

Murray J. Horn and Kenneth A. Shepsle , ‘Commentary on “Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies”: Administrative Process and Organizational Form as Legislative Responses to Agency Costs’, Virginia Law Review, 75 (1995), 499508

Virginia A. Chanley , Thomas J. Rudolph and Wendy M. Rahn , ‘The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (2000), 239256

John T. Scholz and Mark Lubell , ‘Adaptive Political Attitudes: Duty, Trust, and Fear as Monitors of Tax Policy’, American Journal of Political Science, 42 (1998), 903920

Paul M. Sniderman , Richard A. Brody and Philip Tetlock , Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991)

Stanley Feldman and John Zaller , ‘The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State’, American Journal of Political Science, 36 (1992), 268307

Michael Tomz , Jason Wittenberg and Gary King , ‘Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results’, Journal of Statistical Software, 8 (2003)

Thomas Brambor , William Roberts Clark and Matt Golder , ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, 14 (2006), 6382

Shane Frederick , George Loewenstein and Ted O’Donoghue , ‘Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review’, Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (2002), 351401

John G. Bullock , Donald P. Green and Shang E. Ha , ‘Yes, but What’s the Mechanism? (Don’t Expect an Easy Answer)’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (2010), 550558

Stephen Knack and Philip Keefer , ‘Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2006), 12511288

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Jacobs supplementary material
Appendix 1.doc

 Word (399 KB)
399 KB
Supplementary Materials

Jacobs supplementary material
Appendix 2.doc

 Word (77 KB)
77 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 69 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 346 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.