Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T17:09:16.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study of equine compound feeds for leisure and performance horses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J. Gater
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, U.K., Email:johanna.gater@students.plymouth.ac.uk
T. Counsell
Affiliation:
Duchy College, Stoke Climsland, Callington, Cornwall PL17 6NQ, U.K., Email:tessa.counsell@duchy.ac.uk
Get access

Extract

A wide variety of equine compound feeds are now available, aimed at simplifying the feeding of horses, by removing the need for detailed nutritional calculations previously necessary with ‘straights’. It is assumed that the majority of feed sales are based on the name of the manufacturer and the branding of the individual product rather than the nutritional content. Research in equine nutrition has accelerated in the last decade and a greater academic understanding of equine nutrition has now been reached (Pagan 1998; Pagan 2001; Lawrence 2001). It appears that an ever-widening gap is being created between academic research and the end consumers, with regard to ration formulation and the nutritional requirements of horses. This gap is mainly being bridged by the compound feed manufacturers who are widely trusted to deliver correctly balanced compound feed. The objective of the present study is to investigate energy levels and sources of energy in compound feeds against peer-reviewed research standard levels (NRC 1989; Lawrence 2001) to ascertain whether feed manufacturers are delivering metabolically efficient and nutritionally balanced sources of energy in compound feeds for horses.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Key references

Crandell, K., Pagan, J.D., Harris, P., Duren, S.E. 2001. A Comparison of Grain, Vegetable Oil and Beet Pulp as Energy Sources for the Exercised Horse. From: Pagan, J.D. (Ed.). 2001. Advances in Equine Nutrition II. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press Google Scholar
Cuddeford, D. 1996. Equine Nutrition. Wiltshire: The Crowood Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Frape, D. 2004. Equine Nutrition and Feeding. Essex: Longman Scientific & Technical (Longman Group Limited)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geelen, S.N.J., Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan, M.M., Beynen, A.C. 1999. Dietary fat supplementation and equine plasma lipid metabolism. Equine vet.J., Suppl. 30 (1999) 475478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham-Thiers, P.M., Kronfield, D.S., Kline, K.A. 1999. Dietary protein influences acid-base responses to repeated sprints. Equine vet.J., Suppl. 30 (1999) 463467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horace Hayes, M. 2002. Veterinary Notes for Horse Owners (18th Ed.). London: Ebury Press Google Scholar
Lawrence, L.M. 1998. Protein Requirements of Equine Athletes. From: Pagan, J.D. (Ed). 1998. Advances in Equine Nutrition. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press Google Scholar
Loving, N.S. & Johnston, A.M. 1995. Veterinary Manual for the Performance Horse. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd Google Scholar
Marlin, D. & Nankervis, K. 2002. Equine Exercise Physiology. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC). 1989. Nutrient Requirements of Horses. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press Google Scholar
Pagan, J.D. [Ed.]. 1998. Advances in Equine Nutrition. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press Google Scholar
Pagan, J.D. [Ed.]. 2001. Advances in Equine Nutrition II. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press Google Scholar