Hostname: page-component-65f69f4695-xtrld Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-30T12:20:41.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metabolic loads to be expected from different genotypes under different systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

C. H. Knight ,
D. E. Beever  and
A. Sorensen
C. H. Knight
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL
D. E. Beever
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AT
A. Sorensen
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL
Get access

Abstract

The strategy most widely adopted to improve milk production efficiency is to increase yield per cow. To date, this has been achieved primarily through genetic selection and improved nutrition. Achievement of very high individual yield has had its down-side, especially in terms of reduced reproductive efficiency and there is now quite widespread concern that the high genetic merit cow is at greater risk of metabolic disease than her unimproved counterpart. To quote from the recent Farm Animal Welfare Council Report on Dairy Cow Welfare (FAWC, 1997): ‘High metabolic turnover in cows can be associated with a greater risk of mastitis, lameness, infertility and other production diseases…’. Whilst there can be little doubt that metabolic turn-over is indeed higher in high merit cows, it is not safe to assume that this necessarily equates with more risk; metabolic turn-over is higher in an elephant than in a mouse but risk is certainly not. Metabolic load might be a better term to use. If we think, simplistically, of this being the ‘strain’ on a system it is logical to expect an inverse relationship between metabolic load and health. The extrapolation to high genetic merit cows being at greater risk then presupposes that they experience an increased metabolic load but there has been no rigorous evaluation of whether this is so. In this review we will consider what is meant by metabolic load, examine in qualitative theoretical terms what degree of load might be expected from different commercial systems and present some recently obtained data which addresses directly the question, is metabolic load greater in high genetic merit cows?

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 24: Metabolic stress in dairy cows , 1999 , pp. 27 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amburgh, M. van, Galton, D., Bauman, D. and Everett, R. W. 1997. Management and economics of extended calving intervals with use of BST. Livestock Production Science 50:15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. V. 1994. Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. Journal of Dairy Science 77:2044–2050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Peled, U., Aharoni, Y., Robinzon, B., Bruckental, I., Lehrer, R., Malta, E., Knight, C. H., Kali, J., Folman, Y., Voet, H., Gacitua, H. and Tagari, H. 1998. The effect of enhanced milk yield of dairy cows by frequent milking or suckling on intake and digestibility of the diet. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 1420–1427.Google Scholar
Bar-Peled, U., Malta, E., Bruckental, I., Folman, Y., Kali, Y., Gacitua, H., Lehrer, A. R., Knight, C. H., Robinzon, B., Voet, H. and Tagari, H. 1995. Relationship between frequent milking or suckling in early lactation and milk production of high producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 2726–2736.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Cammell, S. B., Sutton, J. D., Rowe, N. and Perrott, G. E. 1998. Energy metabolism in high yielding dairy cows. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 1998, p. 13.Google Scholar
Butte, N. F. and Hopkinson, J. M. 1998. Body composition changes during lactation are highly variable among women. Journal of Nutrition 128: 381S–385S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, S. R. 1998. Once-daily milking of dairy cows: an appraisal. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 58:36–40.Google Scholar
Erb, H. N., Smith, R. D., Hillman, R. B., Powers, P. A., Smith, M. C., White, M. E. and Pearson, E. G. 1984. Rates of diagnosis of six diseases of Holstein cows during 15-day and 21-day intervals. American Journal of Veterinary Research 45: 333–335.Google ScholarPubMed
Farm Animal Welfare Council. 1997. Report on the welfare of dairy cattle. FAWC, Surbiton, Surrey.Google Scholar
Grohn, Y., Saloniemi, H. and Syvajarvi, J. 1986. An epidemiological and genetic study on registered diseases in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. I. The data, disease occurrence and culling. Acta Veterinaria Scanđinavica 27:182–195.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W., Wilson, G. F., MacKenzie, D. D. S. and Purchas, J. 1992. The effects of milking once daily throughout lactation on performance of dairy cows grazing pasture. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society for Animal Production 52:13–16.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. and Goss, S. 1988. Low cost systems of milk production. In Nutrition and lactation in the dairy cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 395–410. Butterworths: London.Google Scholar
Knight, C. H. 1998. Extended lactation. Hannah Research Institute yearbook, 1998, pp. 30–39.Google Scholar
Knight, C. H. and Dewhurst, R. D. 1994. Once daily milking of dairy cows; relationship between yield loss and mammary cistern capacity. Journal of Dairy Research 61: 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logue, D. N., Berry, R. J., Offer, J. E., Chaplin, S. J., Crawshaw, W. M., Leach, K. A., Ball, P. J. H. and Bax, J. 1999. Consequences of metabolic load for lameness and disease. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 83–98. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1995. Implications of genotype X nutrition interactions for efficiency of milk production systems. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J., Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), pp. 67–77. Occasional publication no. 19 of the British Society of Animal Science.Google Scholar
Prentice, A. M. and Prentice, A. 1988. Energy costs of lactation. Annual Review of Nutrition 8:63–79.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Nielsen, B. L., Veerkamp, R. F. and Simm, G. 1999. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science In press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1986. Changes in body composition during pregnancy and lactation. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 45:71–80.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. C. and Reid, H. W. 1999. Consequences for immune function of metabolic adaptations to load. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 113–118. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Sorensen, A. and Knight, C. H. 1999. Localization of metabolic restriction point in cows of differing genetic merit. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 183–187. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24.Google Scholar
Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., Sjuana, L. O., Bertilsson, J. and Wiktorsson, H. 1997. Use of regular milking records versus daily records for nutrition and other kinds of management. Livestock Production Management 48:167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C., Leach, K. A., Logue, D. N., Ferris, C. and Phipps, R. H. 1999. Management options to reduce load. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 129–139. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1974. Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist 14:249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F. and Moe, P. W. 1975. Effect of intake on digestive efficiency. Journal of Dairy Science 58:1151–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1995. Genotype by environment interactions: experience from Langhill. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J., Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), pp. 59–66. Occasional publication no. 19 of the British Society of Animal Science. Google Scholar
Ward, W. R. and Parker, C. S. 1999. Field evidence of metabolic stress in dairy cows. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 21–26. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Webb, R., Garnsworthy, P., Gong, J. G., Robinson, R. S. and Wathes, D. C. 1999. Consequences for reproductive function of metabolic adaptation to load. In Metabolic stress in dairy cows (ed. Oldham, J. D., Simm, G., Groen, A. F., Nielsen, B. L., Pryce, J. E. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 99–112. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 24. Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1995. Welfare considerations in future selection and management strategies. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J., Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), pp. 87–93. Occasional publication no. 19 of the British Society of Animal Science. Google Scholar