Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T23:32:03.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neonatal survival: an overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

M. A. Varley
M. A. Varley*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
Get access

Abstract

Mortality in neonates has always represented significant economic wastage and slow progress has been made in the understanding of the factors influencing the probability of survival or death. There is also increasing pressure in the animal agriculture sphere to pursue improved welfare and in the situation where neonatal deaths are a high proportion of the liveborn offspring, then this becomes not only an economic concern but also a welfare issue. This paper highlights principal problems within the neonatal area in order to introduce the ensuing text dealing with specific technical challenges.

The magnitude of loss for different species including humans is given and the factors affecting mortalities are discussed. The major components include: human factors, pathogenic agents, immunological factors, temperature and thermoregulation, nutrition, behaviour and physical factors.

Although single factors are often ascribed as the cause of death, the reality is that there are usually multifactorial components involved which interact and contribute to the final mortality of the individual.

The approach to the practical management of neonates varies widely between the different animal industries and the techniques deployed depend on relative economic values. In human health care every available resource is used to ensure very high survival rates because of the incalculable value of each individual delivered. With farm animals the use of resources is at a much lower level and survival rates are lower. It ought to be possible in animal agriculture to adopt some of the methods used in the medical profession to assess high risk situations and to divert resources appropriately.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 15 , 1992 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballabriga, A., Hilpert, H. and Isliker, H. 1976. Immunity of the infantile gastrointestinal tract and implications on modern infant feeding. Nestle Research News 1974/1975, pp. 24–45. Nestle Products Technical Assistance Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
De Passillé, A. M. and Rushen, J. 1990. Suckling behaviour and piglet survival. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 69: 536–543.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 1990. Behavioural perspectives on piglet survival. In Control of pig reproduction 3 (ed. Cole, D. J. A., Foxcroft, G. R. and Weir, B. J.), Journal of Reproduction and Fertility supplement 40, pp. 355–370.Google Scholar
Hanson, L. A. and Winberg, J. 1972. Breast milk and defence against infection in the newborn. Archives of Diseases in Childhood 47: 845–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, P. H. and Barnett, J. L. 1990. Behavioural responses affecting gilt and sow reproduction. In Control of pig reproduction 3 (ed. Cole, D. J. A., Foxcroft, G. R. and Weir, B. J.), Journal of Reproduction and Fertility supplement 40, pp. 343–354.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Brand, A. and Willems, P. 1981. The behavioural response of sows to the presence of human beings and its relation to productivity. Livestock Production Science 8: 67–74.Google Scholar
Holst, K., Henningsen, I. and Hilden, J. 1989. The unborn and newborn child. 2. Risk-factors predicting perinatal morbidity and mortality in 4138 infants. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 68: 707–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, R. C. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1983. Abnormal behaviour of piglets reared in individual incubators. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 83–84.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. Z. 1937. The companion in the bird's world. Auk 54: 245–273.Google Scholar
Mata, L. 1978. Breast feeding: main promoter of infant health. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31: 2058–2065.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1970–1990. Pig yearbooks 1970-1990. MLC, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1987. Beef yearbook 1987. MLC, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1990. Sheep yearbook 1990. MLC, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Muller, H. 1976. Infant nutrition today. Nestle Research News 1974-1975, pp. 13–23. Nestle Products Technical Assistance Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Pullar, R. A., Varley, M. A. and Anderton, D. J. 1991. The effect of a plasma derived immunoglobulin supplement on the survival and growth of neonatal piglets. Animal Production 52: 575 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Samueloff, A., Mor-Yosef, S., Seidman, D. S., Adler, I., Persitz, E. and Schenker, J.G. 1989. Ranking risk-factors for perinatal mortality. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 68: 677–687.Google Scholar
Seabrook, M. F. 1972. A study to determine the influence of the herdsman's personality on milk yield. Journal of Agricultural Labour Science 1:1–45.Google Scholar
Sweet, A. 1986. Classification of the low birth weight infant. In Care of the high risk neonate (ed. Klaus, M. H. and Fanaroff, A. A.), pp. 69–95. Ardmore Medical Books.Google Scholar
Trunkfield, H. R. and Broom, D. M. 1990. The welfare of calves during handling and transport. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28:135–152.Google Scholar
Varley, M. A., Fowler, V. R. and Maitland, A. 1985. A rearing system for colostrum-deprived neonatal piglets. Laboratory Animals 19: 290–296.Google Scholar
Varley, M. A., Maitland, A. and Ross, L. N. 1986. The performance of piglets weaned at birth or one day of age and the use of oral vaccines against E. coli antigens. Livestock Production Science 15: 83–95.Google Scholar
Varley, M. A., Maitland, A. and Towle, A. 1986. Artificial rearing of piglets: the administration of two sources of immunoglobulins after birth. Animal Production 43:121–126.Google Scholar
Varley, M. A., Wilkinson, R. G. and Maitland, A. 1987. Artificial rearing of baby piglets: the effect of colostrum on survival and plasma concentrations of IgG. British Veterinary Journal 143: 369–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, A. R. and Baxter, M. R. 1986. Responses of newborn piglets to thermal and tactile properties of their environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 203–215.Google Scholar
Williams, P. E. V. 1990. The application of biotechnology in pig feeding. Proceedings of the Colborn-Dawes Nutrition Ltd 14th Feed Industry Conference, Harrogate, Paper No. 9.Google Scholar