Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-07T02:33:51.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of ageing and nutrition on the reproductive system of Samea multiplicalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. F. J. Taylor  and
D. P. A. Sands
M. F. J. Taylor
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Long Pocket Laboratories, Private Bag No. 3, P.O., Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia
D. P. A. Sands
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Long Pocket Laboratories, Private Bag No. 3, P.O., Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of ageing, larval dietary nitrogen and adult carbohydrate diets on development of the male and female reproductive systems of Samea multiplicalis Guenée are described. Mature oocytes appeared in the ovarioles of one-day-old females and remained constant in number from one to three days after eclosion. Females from larvae that fed on plants of Salvinia molesta matured fewer oocytes (65 vs. 138) when the plants had lower (0·94% vs. 2·74%) levels of nitrogen. Resorbing oocytes were identified in the ovarioles of females 1–3 days old. The proportion of females with resorbing oocytes increased with age but not with larval dietary nutrition. Following high levels of larval dietary nitrogen, the seminal vesicles in males increased in length, while their width increased with age but not with diet. High levels of larval dietary nitrogen and an intake of adult dietary carbohydrate were both necessary for maximum fecundity. Higher levels of larval dietary nitrogen resulted in greater adult size, as measured by forewing length.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , September 1986 , pp. 513 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bell, W. J. & Bohm, M. K. (1975). Oosorption in insects.—Biol. Rev. 50, 373–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chew, F. S. & Robbins, R. K. (1984). Egg-laying in butterflies.—pp. 65–79 in Vane-Wright, R. I. & Ackery, P. R. (Eds.). The biology of butterflies.—255 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Johansson, A. S. (1964). Feeding and nutrition in reproductive processes in insects.—pp. 43–55 in Highnam, K. C. (Ed.). Insect reproduction.—Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. no. 2, 120 pp.Google Scholar
Leather, S. R. (1984). The effect of adult feeding on the fecundity, weight loss and survival of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (D&S).—Oecologia 65, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lum, P. T. M. (1979). Degeneration of ova in the bulla seminalis of Lepidoptera.—J. Insect Physiol. 25, 595–599.Google Scholar
Room, P. M., Forno, I. W. & Taylor, M. F. J. (1984). Establishment in Australia of two insects for biological control of the floating weed Salvinia molesta.—Bull. ent. Res. 74, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, D. P. A. & Kassulke, R. C. (1984). Samea multiplicalis [Lep.: Pyralidae], for biological control of two water weeds, Salvinia molesta and Pistia stratiotes in Australia.—Entomophaga 29, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, D. P. A., Schotz, M. & Bourne, A. S. (1983). The feeding characteristics and development of larvae of a salvinia weevil Cyrtobagous sp.—Entomologia exp. appl. 34, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. F. J. (1984). The dependence of development and fecundity of Samea multiplicalis on early larval nitrogen intake.—J. Insect Physiol. 30, 779–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. H. & Twine, J. R. (1967). Determination of nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium in plant material by automatic analysis.—Tech. Pap. Div. Pl. Ind. C.S.I.R.O. Aust. no. 24, 16 pp.Google Scholar