Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:57:52.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretation of the flight activity of Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) and Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) based on comparative trap catches and field marking with rubidium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

T. J. Perfect ,
A. G. Cook ,
D. E. Padgham  and
J. M. Crisostomo
T. J. Perfect
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research institute, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
A. G. Cook
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research institute, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
D. E. Padgham
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research institute, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK
J. M. Crisostomo
Affiliation:
Philippine Council for Agriculture and Resources Research Development, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Detailed studies were conducted over a five-year period at a rice farm in the Philippines on the flight activity of Nilaparvata lugens Stål) and Sogatella furcifera (Horváth). Suction traps were used to measure aerial density, and catches included immigrants, emigrants and insects undertaking trivial flight. Activity was partitioned using a variety of other trap types. Emigration was effectively monitored using net canopy traps and immigration was best measured using green water traps. Yellow water traps also measured immigration, but when macropterous adults were being produced within the plot, insects undertaking trivial flight were also caught. The light-trap caught immigrant and over-flying migrant insects.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 93 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dyck, V. A., Misra, B. C., Alam, S., Chen, C. N., Hsieh, C. Y. & Rejesus, R. S. (1979). Ecology of the brown planthopper in the tropics.—pp. 61–98in Brown planthopper: threat to rice production in Asia.—369 pp. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, Int. Rice Res. Inst.Google Scholar
Gressitt, J. L. & Gressitt, M. K. (1962). An improved Malaise trap.—Pacif. Insects 4, 87–90Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1950). The comparison of suction trap, sticky trap and tow-net for the quantitative sampling of small airborne insects.—Ann. appl. Biol. 37, 268–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisimoto, R. (1968). Yellow pan water trap for sampling the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén), a vector of the rice stripe virus.—Appl. Entomol. & Zool. 3, 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisimoto, R. (1976). Synoptic weather conditions inducing long-distance immigration of planthoppers, Sogatella furcifera Horváth and Nilaparvata lugens Stål.—Ecol. Entomol. 1, 95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusakabe, S. I. (1979). Dispersal of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvala lugens Stål (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) in relation to its population growth.—Appl. Entomol. & Zool. 14, 224–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaise, R. (1937). A new insect-trap.—Ent Tidskr. 58, 148–160Google Scholar
Padgham, D. E. (1983). Flight fuels in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens.—J. Insect Physiol. 29, 95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgham, D. E., Cook, A. G. & Hutchison, D. (1984). Rubidium marking of the rice pests Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) and Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) for field dispersal studies.—Bull. ent. Res. 74, 379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfect, T. J. & Cook, A. G. (1982). Diurnal periodicity of flight in some Delphacidae and Cicadellidae associated with rice.—Ecol. Entomol. 7, 317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, R. C. & Justo, H. D. Jr, (1982). Diel periodicity of take-off and immigration flights of the rice brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens.—pp. 169–178in Visser, J. H. & Minks, A. K. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Insect.—Plant Relationships, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 1–4 March 1982–464 pp. Wageningen, Pudoc.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1978). Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations.— 2nd edn, 524 pp. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Taylor, J., Padgham, D. E. & Perfect, T. J. (1982). A light-trap with upwardly directed illumination and temporal segregation of the catch.—Bull. ent. Res. 72, 669–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1951). An improved suction trap for insects.—Ann. appl. Biol. 38, 582–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1955). The standardization of air-flow in insect suction traps.—Ann. appl. Biol. 43, 390–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1962). The absolute efficiency of insect suction traps.—Ann. appl. Biol. 50, 405–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. & Palmer, J. M. P. (1972). Aerial sampling.—pp. 189–234in van Emden, H. F. (Ed.). Aphid technology.— 344 pp. London & New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. & Milne, P. S. (1935). A mechanical insect trap.—Bull. ent. Res. 26, 543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar