Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-8ckrc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-30T16:57:37.189Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Methods of Automatic Collecting for Studying the Fauna of the Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Ivar Trägårdh
Chief, Entomological Department, Royal Swedish Institute of Experimental Forestry.


When studying the fauna of the soil it is obviously of the utmost importance to use such methods of collecting the animals as are thoroughly reliable and efficient, so that one can be reasonably sure of getting practically all the animals existing in a given material. It is not to be expected that one method will ensure successful collection of all the animals, because some react in one way towards the agents chiefly used, viz., strong light and heat, others react in another way. For instance, some animals, such as Tardigrades and Rhizopoda, encyst themselves when subjected to dryness and cannot be forced to move downwards away from the light and dryness as most arthropods do. As pointed out by the author (1928) all methods of mechanically separating the animals from the substratum by sieves, etc., are worthless unless applied to larger animals such as Oligochaeta, larger beetles and snails. For all smaller animals the only safe method is the automatic one based on their reactions towards light and dryness, which was devised by the late Professor A. Berlese in Florence in 1905.

This apparatus is so well known that it is not necessary to give a detailed description of it, nor need I dwell on the more or less similar apparatus constructed later, except Tullgren's, because the latter, constructed in 1917, has been used by several investigators. Tullgren substituted the funnel filled with water and heated by gas, which Berlese used for the purpose of drying the material containing the micro-arthropods to be collected, by an electric bulb suspended above the material in a cylindrical funnel at a distance of about 5 cm. above the material.

Original Articles
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Berlese, A.Apparecchio par raccogliere presto ed in gran numero piccoli artropodiRedia, ii, 1905, p. 85.Google Scholar
Bornebusch, C. H. The Fauna of Forest Soil.—Skovbundens Dyreverden, Kopenhagen, 1930.Google Scholar
Pfetten, J. von. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fauna der Waldstreu. Fichtenstreu-Untersuchungen.—Zeits. f. angew. Entom., xi, Heft 1, 1925.Google Scholar
Pillai, S. K.Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fauna der Waldstreu. Kiefernstreu-Untersuchungen.—Zeits. f. angew. Entom., viii, Heft. 1,1922.Google Scholar
Tullgren, A.En enkel apparat för automatiskt vittjande av sallgods.—Ent. Tidskr., xxxvii, 1917.Google Scholar
Trägårdh, I.Om Berleses apparat för snabb och effektiv insamling av små leddjur.—Ent. Tidskr., xxxi, 1910.Google Scholar
Trägårdh, I. Undersökningar över det lägre djurlivet i marken. (Studies on the Fauna of the Soil in Swedish Forests.)—Skogshögskolans Festskrift 1928, Stockholm 1928.Google Scholar
Trägårdh, I. Studies in the Fauna of the Soil in Swedish Forests.—IV International Congress of Entomology,Ithaca,August 1928, ii, Naumberg a.S., 1929.Google Scholar