Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:55:51.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Bionomics of Anopheles sacharovi* in Persia and Iraq

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. Etherington  and
G. Sellick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An increased indoor population of Anopheles sacharovi at the start of hibernation is recorded.

Figures are given for dissections of A. sacharovi during the winter months, showing an infectivity rate (sporozoites) of 0·41 per cent.

Eggs of A. sacharovi laid at the end of hibernation are described.

An account is given of an area in Northern Persia where A. sacharovi is present in association with a lower endemicity of malaria than is usual.

We are indebted to Lt.-Col. D. N. Keys, R.A.M.C., Major J. Yofe, R.A.M.C., and Major R. Hillman, R.A.M.C., for their interest and help in these observations.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , September 1946 , pp. 191 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Christophers, S. R., Sinton, J. A. & Covell, G. (1928). How to do a malaria survey.—Health Bull., no. 14 pp. 63–65. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Hackett, L. W. & Missiroli, A. (1935). The varieties of Anopheles maculipennis and their relation to the distribution of malaria in Europe.—Riv. Malariol., 14, pp. 45–109.Google Scholar
Mer, G. (1931). Notes on the bionomics of Anopheles elutus, Edw. (Dipt. Culic.).—Bull. ent. Res., 22, pp. 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missiroli, A. (1938). Varieties of Anopheles maculipennis and the malaria problem in Italy.—Trans. int. Congr. Ent., Berlin, 7 (2), pp. 1619–1640.Google Scholar