Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Automated moth flight analysis in the vicinity of artificial light

  • P. Gaydecki (a1)

Abstract

Instrumentation and software for the automated analysis of insect flight trajectories is described, intended for quantifying the behavioural dynamics of moths in the vicinity of artificial light. For its time, this moth imaging system was relatively advanced and revealed hitherto undocumented insights into moth flight behaviour. The illumination source comprised a 125 W mercury vapour light, operating in the visible and near ultraviolet wavelengths, mounted on top of a mobile telescopic mast at heights of 5 and 7.1 m, depending upon the experiment. Moths were imaged in early September, at night and in field conditions, using a ground level video camera with associated optics including a heated steering mirror, wide angle lens and an electronic image intensifier. Moth flight coordinates were recorded at a rate of 50 images per second (fields) and transferred to a computer using a light pen (the only non-automated operation in the processing sequence). Software extracted ground speed vectors and, by instantaneous subtraction of wind speed data supplied by fast-response anemometers, the airspeed vectors. Accumulated density profiles of the track data revealed that moths spend most of their time at a radius of between 40 and 50 cm from the source, and rarely fly directly above it, from close range. Furthermore, the proportion of insects caught by the trap as a proportion of the number influenced by the light (and within the field of view of the camera) was very low; of 1600 individual tracks recorded over five nights, a total of only 12 were caught. Although trap efficiency is strongly dependent on trap height, time of night, season, moonlight and weather, the data analysis confirmed that moths do not exhibit straightforward positive phototaxis. In general, trajectory patterns become more complex with reduced distance from the illumination, with higher recorded values of speeds and angular velocities. However, these characteristics are further qualified by the direction of travel of the insect; the highest accelerations tended to occur when the insect was at close range, but moving away from the source. Rather than manifesting a simple positive phototaxis, the trajectories were suggestive of disorientation. Based on the data and the complex behavioural response, mathematical models were developed that described ideal density distribution in calm air and light wind speed conditions. The models did not offer a physiological hypothesis regarding the behavioural changes, but rather were tools for quantification and prediction. Since the time that the system was developed, instrumentation, computers and software have advanced considerably, allowing much more to be achieved at a small fraction of the original cost. Nevertheless, the analytical tools remain useful for automated trajectory analysis of airborne insects.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence Phone: +44 (0) 161 306 4906 E-mail: patrick.gaydecki@manchester.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Angarita-Jaimes, N.C., Parker, J.E.A., Abe, M., Mashauri, F., Martine, J., Towers, C.E., McCall, P.J. & Towers, D.P. (2016) A novel video-tracking system to quantify the behaviour of nocturnal mosquitoes attacking human hosts in the field. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 13, 20150974.
Baker, R.R. & Sadovy, Y. (1978) The distance and nature of the light-trap response of moths. Nature 276, 818821.
Callahan, P.S. (1965) Intermediate and far infrared sensing of nocturnal insects. Part I. Evidences for a far infrared (FIR) electromagnetic theory of communication and sensing in moths and its relationship to the limiting biosphere of the corn earworm. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 58, 727745.
Carver, J.H., Horton, B.H., O'Brien, R.S. & O'Connor, G.G. (1974). The ultraviolet reflectivity of the moon. Earth, Moon, and Planets 9, 295303.
El-Sayed, A.M., Gödde, J. & Arn, H. (2000) A computer-controlled video system for real-time recording of insect flight in three dimensions. Journal of Insect Behavior 13, 881900.
Evangelista, D.J., Ray, D.D., Raja, S.K. & Hedrick, T.L. (2017) Three-dimensional trajectories and network analyses of group behaviour within chimney swift flocks during approaches to the roost. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B 284, 20162602.
Gaydecki, P. (1984) A Quantification of the Behavioural Dynamics of Certain Lepidoptera in Response to Light (PhD thesis), Cranfield Institute of Technology, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK.
Hinterwirth, A.J. & Daniel, T.L. (2010) Antennae in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) mediate abdominal flexion in response to mechanical stimuli. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 196, 947956.
Hsiao, H.S. (1973) Flight paths of night-flying moths to light. Journal of Insect Physiology 19, 19711976.
Ingram, E.M., Augustin, J., Ellis, M.D. & Siegfried, B.D. (2015) Evaluating sub-lethal effects of orchard-applied pyrethroids using video-tracking software to quantify honey bee behaviors. Chemosphere 135, 272277.
Macgregor, C.J., Pocock, M.J.O., Fox, R. & Evans, D.M. (2015), Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review. Ecological Entomology 40, 187198.
Mazokhin-Porshnyakov, G.A. (1961) Why insects fly to light by night. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde 34, 47.
Mueller, E.A. & Larkin, R.P. (1985) Insects observed using dual-polarization radar. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 2, 4954.
Mullen, E.R., Rutschman, P., Pegram, N., Patt, J.M. & Adamczyk, J.J. (2016) Laser system for identification, tracking, and control of flying insects. Optics Express 24, 1182811838.
Nirmal, A., Sidar, Y. K., Gajbhiye, R. & Laxmi, J. (2017) The effects of moonlight phases on light-trap catches of insects. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5, 12091210.
Nowinszky, L. & Puskás, J. (2014). Light-trap catch of Lygus sp. (Heteroptera: Miridae) in connection with the polarized moonlight, the collecting distance and the staying of the Moon above horizon. Journal of Advanced Laboratory Research in Biology 5, 102107.
Psychoudakis, D., Moulder, W., Chen, C.C., Zhu, H. & Volakis, J.L. (2008) A portable low-power harmonic radar system and conformal tag for insect tracking. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 7, 444447.
Reynolds, D.R. & Riley, J.R (2002). Remote-sensing, telemetric and computer-based technologies for investigating insect movement: a survey of existing and potential techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 35, 271307.
Riley, J.R., Smith, A.D., Reynolds, D.R. & Edwards, A.S. (1996) Tracking bees with harmonic radar. Nature 379, 29.
Robinson, H.S. & Robinson, P.J.M. (1950) Some notes on the observed behavior of Lepidoptera in flight in the vicinity of light sources. Entomologist's Gazette 1, 320.
Schaefer, G.W. & Bent, G.A. (1984) An infra-red remote sensing system for the active detection and automatic determination of insect flight trajectories (IRADIT). Bulletin of Entomological Research 74, 261278.
Shimoda, M. & Honda, K.I. (2013) Insect reactions to light and its applications to pest management. Applied Entomology and Zoology 48, 413421.
Smith, A.D., Riley, J.R. & Gregory, R.D. (1993) A method for routine monitoring of the aerial migration of insects by using a vertical-looking radar. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 340, 393404.
Sokolowski, M.B., Moine, M. & Naassila, M. (2012). ‘Beetrack’: a software for 2D open field locomotion analysis in honey bees. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 207, 211217.
Sotthibandhu, S. & Baker, R.R. (1979) Celestial orientation by the large yellow underwing moth, Noctua pronuba L. Animal Behaviour 27, 786800.
Truxa, C. & Fiedler, K. (2012) Attraction to light-from how far do moths (Lepidoptera) return to weak artificial sources of light? European Journal of Entomology 109, 77.
van Grunsven, R.H., Donners, M., Boekee, K., Tichelaar, I., Van Geffen, K.G., Groenendijk, D., Berendse, F. & Veenendaal, E.M. (2014) Spectral composition of light sources and insect phototaxis, with an evaluation of existing spectral response models. Journal of Insect Conservation 18, 225231.
Warrant, E. & Dacke, M. (2016) Visual navigation in nocturnal insects. Physiology 31, 182192.
Whitehorn, L.J., Hawkes, F.M. & Dublon, I.A. (2013) Superplot3d: an open source GUI tool for 3d trajectory visualisation and elementary processing. Source Code for Biology and Medicine 8, 19.
Wilkinson, D.A., Lebon, C., Wood, T., Rosser, G. & Gouagna, L. C. (2014) Straightforward multi-object video tracking for quantification of mosquito flight activity. Journal of Insect Physiology 71, 114121.
Yela, J.L. & Holyoak, M. (1997) Effects of moonlight and meteorological factors on light and bait trap catches of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology 26, 12831290.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed