Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Comparative studies on Tetrastichus hagenowii (Ratzeburg) and T. asthenogmus (Waterston), two primary parasites of cockroach oothecae, and on their hyperparasite Tetrastichus sp. (T. miser (Nees) group) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)

  • A. Uma Narasimham (a1)
Abstract

Tetrastichus hagenowii (Ratz.) and T. asthenogmus (Wtstn.) are parasitic in cockroach oothecae and may themselves be attacked by a species of Tetrastichus of the group of T. miser (Nees). In Bangalore in 1976–79, the primary parasites were reared from oothecae of Periplaneta americana (L.), P. australasiae (F.) and P. brunnea Burm., and laboratory colonies of them were established on oothecae of P. americana. The hyperparasite, reared from field-collected oothecae of Periplaneta spp., was bred in the laboratory on oothecae of P. americana containing larvae of T. hagenowü. The immature stages of the three species of parasites were compared and their biologies studied. The eggs of the three species can be differentiated on the basis of their shape as can the pupae, but the larvae of the two primary parasites are indistinguishable. The duration of the developmental stages of the three species overlapped but the hyperparasite had a slightly shorter pupal period. Host finding by the T. hagenowii female was investigated. The two primary parasites were similar in most of their biological attributes. However, T. asthenogmus was inherently superior to the Bangalore strain of T. hagenowii in having lower levels of female sterility and its greater preference for the oothecae of P. brunnea, the predominant species of cockroach in Bangalore. T. hagenowii proved to be more tolerent of low temperatures than T. asthenogmus. The hyperparasite had an advantage over the other two species in possessing longer life-span and synovigenic females, and individual females parasitised more oothecae in their life-span than the primary parasites; but it was unable to distinguish healthy oothecae from those containing larvae of the other two species until it had drilled into them.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Amonkar, S. V., Vijayalakshmi, L. V. & Rahalkar, G. V. (1974). Control of American cockroach, Periplaneta americana L. by its egg parasite Tetrastichus hagenowii Ratz. a field trial.—pp. 228233in Symposium on biological approach to problems in medicine, industry and agriculture.—Bombay, Bhabha Atom. Res. Centre.
Askew, R. R. (1968). Considerations on speciation in Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera).Evolution 22, 642645.
Burks, B. D. (1943). The North American parasitic wasps of the genus Tetrastichus—a contribution to biological control of insect pests.—Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 93, 505608.
Cameron, E. (1955). On the parasites and predators of the cockroach. I.—Tetrastichus hagenowii (Ratz.).Bull. ent. Res. 46, 137147.
Clausen, C. P. (1939). The effect of host size upon the sex ratio of hymenopterous parasites and its relation to methods of rearing and colonization.—Jl N. Y. ent. Soc. 47. 19.
Edmunds, L. R. (1955). Biological notes on Tetrastichus hagenowii (Ratzeburg), a chalcidoid parasite of cockroach eggs (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae; Orthoptera: Blattidae).Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 48, 210213.
Flanders, S. E. (1950). Regulation of ovulation and egg disposal in the parasitic Hymenoptera.—Can. Ent. 82, 134140.
Flanders, S. E. (1966). The circumstances of species replacement among parasitic Hymenoptera.—Can. Ent. 82, 134140.
Fleet, R. R. & Frankie, G. W. (1975). Behavioral and ecological characteristics of a eulophid egg parasite of two species of domiciliary cockroaches.—Environ. Entomol. 4, 282284.
Guthrie, D. M. & Tindall, A. R. (1968). The biology of the cockroach.408 pp. London, Edward Arnold.
Narasimham, A. U. & Sankaran, T. (1979). Domiciliary cockroaches and their oothecal parasites in India.—Entomophaga 24, 273279.
Roth, L. M. & Willis, E. R. (1954). The biology of the cockroach egg parasite, Tetrastichus hagenowii (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae).Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 80, 5372.
Roth, L. M. & Willis, E. R. (1957). The medical and veterinary importance of cockroaches.—Smithson. misc. Collns 134, 147 pp.
Roth, L. M. & Willis, E. R. (1960). The biotic associations of cockroaches.—Smithson. misc. Collns 141, 470 pp.
Usman, S. (1949). Some observations on the biology of Tetrastichus hagenowii Ratz.—an egg parasite of the house cockroach (Periplaneta americana L.).Curr. Sci. 18, 407408.
Vargas, V. M. & Fallas, B. F. (1974). Notes on the biology of Tetrastichus hagenowii (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) a parasite of cockroach oothecae.—Ent. News 85. 2326.
Waterston, J. (1915). New species of Chalcidoidea from Ceylon.—Bull, ent. Res. 5, 325342.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bulletin of Entomological Research
  • ISSN: 0007-4853
  • EISSN: 1475-2670
  • URL: /core/journals/bulletin-of-entomological-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed