Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:41:35.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of leguminous plant species on Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and its egg parasitoid Uscana lariophaga (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. van Huis  and
M. de Rooy
A. van Huis*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 8031, 6700 EH Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. de Rooy
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 8031, 6700 EH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
* Fax: 31 317 484821 E-mail: arnold.vanhuis@trop.ento.wau.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The performance of the egg parasitoid Uscana lariophaga Steffan was studied when reared on eggs of the bruchid storage pest, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) developing in seeds of cowpea, chickpea and pigeonpea. The beetle laid more and larger eggs on pigeonpea than on cowpea and chickpea, indicating that there was not a trade-off between number and size of the eggs. The bruchid larvae reared on pigeonpea exhibited a longer development time and a higher mortality than those reared on cowpea and chickpea. The resulting males weighed less than those reared on cowpea and chickpea. The trichogrammatid U. lariophaga parasitized more eggs when C. maculatus was reared on chickpea than when reared on the other hosts. Parasitoid larvae developed slowest and had the highest mortality in eggs of C. maculatus reared on pigeonpea compared to those reared on cowpea and chickpea; the sex ratio (% of females) of the resulting adults was also higher. The high mortality and long development time of C. maculatus reared on pigeonpea indicated that this legume was less favourable to C. maculatus than chickpea or cowpea. This was probably also true for the parasitoid since the mortality was higher and development longer in eggs of C. maculatus reared on pigeonpea compared to those reared on cowpea and chickpea. Therefore, when host eggs were larger and of lower nutritional quality, the proportion of female egg parasitoids was greater.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 93 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altahtawy, M.M., Hammad, S.M. & Hegazi, E.M. (1976) Studies on the dependence Microplitis rufiventris Kok. (Hym., Braconidae) parasitizing Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) on own food as well as on food of its host. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 81, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, P., Saunders, J.A. & Waldvogel, M. (1982) Plant-mediated variation in herbivore suitability and parasitoid fitness. pp. 63–71in Visser, J.H. & Minks, A.K. (Eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Insect-Plant relationships, 1–4 March 1982, Wageningen. PUDOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Berrigan, D. (1991) The allometry of egg size and number in insects. Oikos 60, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigler, F., Meyer, A. & Bosshart, S. (1987) Quality assessment in Trichogramma maidis Pintureau et Voegelé reared from eggs of the factitious hosts Ephestia kuehniella Zell. and Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier). Journal of Applied Entomology 104, 340–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chacko, M.J. (1969) The phenomenon of superparasitism in Trichogramma evanescens minutum Riley-I (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Beiträge zür Entomologie 19, 617–635.Google Scholar
Charnov, E.L. (1979) The genetical evolution of patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness. American Naturalist 113, 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov, E.L., Los-Den Hartogh, R.L., Jones, W.T. & Assem, J. van den (1981) Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment. Nature 289, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C.P. (1939) The effect of host size upon the sex ratio of hymenopterous parasites and its relation to methods of rearing and colonization. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 47, 1–9.Google Scholar
Decelle, J. (1981) Bruchidae related to grain legumes in the Afro-Tropical area. Series Entomologica 19, 193–198.Google Scholar
El-Sawaf, S.K. (1956) Some factors affecting the longevity, oviposition, and rate of development in the southern cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Bulletin de Ia Société Entomologique d'Egypte 40, 29–95.Google Scholar
Fox, C.W. (1993) The influence of maternal age and mating frequency on egg size and offspring performance in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Oecologia 96, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, C.W. (1994) The influence of egg size on offspring performance in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Oikos 71, 321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C.W. & Dingle, H. (1994) Dietary mediation of maternal age effects on offspring performance in a seed beetle (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Functional Ecology 8, 600–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatehouse, A.M.R. & Boulter, D. (1983) Assessment of the antimetabolic effects of trypsin inhibitors from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and other legumes on development of the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giga, D.P. & Smith, R.H. (1987) Egg production and development of Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on several commodities at two different temperatures. Journal of Stored Products Research 23, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H.C.J. (1994) The adult parasitoid. pp. 260–306 in Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gokhale, V.G. (1973) Developmental compatibility of several pulses in the Bruchidae - I. Growth and development of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) on host seeds. Bulletin of Grain Technology 11, 28–31.Google Scholar
Gokhale, V.G. & Srivastava, B.K. (1973) French bean seed coat as an ovipositional attractant for the pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius). Experientia 29, 630–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gokhale, V.G. & Srivastava, B.K. (1975) Ovipositional behaviour of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) - I. Distribution of eggs and relative ovipositional preference on several leguminous seeds. Indian Journal of Entomology 37, 122–128.Google Scholar
Howe, R.W. (1953) The rapid determination of the intrinsic rate of increase of an insect population. Annals of Applied Biology 40, 134–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R.W. & Currie, J.E. (1964) Some laboratory observations on the rates of development, mortality and oviposition of several species of Bruchidae breeding in stored pulses. Bulletin of Entomological Research 55, 437–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huis, A. van, Kaashoek, N.K. & Lammers, P.M. (1990) Uscana lariophaga (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae), egg parasitoid of two bruchid species of cowpea in West Africa. Proceedings Experimental and Applied Entomology, N.E.V. Amsterdam 1, 101–106.Google Scholar
Jackai, L.E.N. & Daoust, R.A. (1986) Insect pests of cowpeas. Annual Review of Entomology 31, 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapila, R. & Agarwal, H.C. (1995) Biology of an egg parasite of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 31, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawecki, T.J. (1995) Adaptive plasticity of egg size in response to competition in the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Oecologia 102, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazmer, D.J. & Luck, R.F. (1991) Female body size, fitness and biological control quality: field experiments with Trichogramma pretiosum. Les Colloques de l'INRA 56, 37–40.Google Scholar
King, B.H. (1989) Host-size-dependent sex ratios among parasitoid wasps: does host growth matter? Oecologia 78, 420–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koura, A., El Halfawy, M. & Shehata, T. (1971) Preference of the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus F., to some legume seeds and weight loss due to insect infestation. Agricultural Research Review 49, 35–40.Google Scholar
Marston, N. & Ertle, L.R. (1973) Host influence on the bionomics of Trichogramma minutum. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 66, 1155–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1975) The evolution of oviposition tactics in the bean weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Ecology 56, 696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousseau, T.A. & Dingle, H. (1991) Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annual Review of Entomology 36, 511–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarajan, Paul A.V., Mohanasundaram, M. & Subramaniam, T.R. (1975) Studies on the effect of larval diets of rice meal moth on its egg parasites Trichogramma australicum Gir. and T. japonicum Ashm. Madras Agricultural Journal 62(4), 190–198.Google Scholar
Navarajan, Paul A.V., Dass, R. & Parshad, B. (1981) Influence of different hosts on parasitism by Trichogramnma chilonis Ishii and T. exiguum Pinto and Platner (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 92, 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nwanze, K.F. & Horber, E. (1976) Seed coats of cowpeas affect oviposition and larval development of Callosobruchus maculatus. Environmental Entomology 5, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nwanze, K.F., Horber, E. & Pitts, C.W. (1975) Evidence for ovipositional preference of Callosobruchus maculatus for cowpea varieties. Environmental Entomology, 4, 409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofuya, T.I. (1987) Growth and development of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on some wild and cultivated cowpeas. International Pest Control 29, 112–113.Google Scholar
Parsons, P.A. (1964) Parental age and the offspring. Quarterly Review of Biology 39, 258–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purrington, F.F. & Uleman, J.S. (1972) Brood size of the parasitic wasp Hyssopus thymus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae): functional correlation with the mass of a cryptic host. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 65, 280–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryoo, M., Yoo, C.K. & Hong, Y.S. (1991) Influences of food quality for Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on life history of Lariophagus distinguendus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). pp. 211–219in Fleurat-Lessard, F. & Ducom, P. (Eds) Proceedings 5th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, Bordeaux, France, Sept. 9–14, 1990, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1940) Experimental studies in insect parasitism. VII. The effects of different hosts on the parasite Trichogramma evanescens Wesw. (Hym.: Chalcidoidea). Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London (A) 15, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J.M. & Smith, J.J.B. (1986) Correlation between body angles and substrate curvature in the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma minutum: a possible mechanism of host radius measurement. Journal of Experimental Biology 125, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J.M. & Smith, J.J.B. (1989) Host examination walk and oviposition site selection of Trichogramma minutum: studies on spherical hosts. Journal of Insect Behavior 2, 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shazali, M.E.H. (1989) The susceptibility of faba bean and other seed legumes to infestation by Bruchidius incarnatus (Boh.) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). FABIS Newsletter 23, 20–24.Google Scholar
Steffan, J.R. (1954) Note sur le genre Uscana Girlt. (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) et description d'espèces nouvelles parasites de bruches. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris 2e sér 26, 667–673.Google Scholar
Stinner, R.E., Ridgway, R.L. & Morrison, R.K. (1974) Longevity, fecundity, and searching ability of Trichogramma pretiosum reared by three methods. Environmental Entomology 3, 558–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Tsuji, H. & Sasakawa, M. (1984) Sex allocation and effects of superparasitism on secondary sex ratios in the gregarious parasitoid, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Animal Behaviour 32, 478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S.B. & Barbosa, P. (1987) Interrelationships of nutritional ecology of parasitoids. pp. 673–695in Slansky, F. & Rodriquez, J.G. (Eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders and related invertebrates. New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. & Iwantsch, G.F. (1980) Host suitability for insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 25, 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vir, S. (1980) Oviposition response and development of Callosobruchus maculatus Fabr. on different varieties of cowpea. Bulletin of Grain Technology 18, 200–203.Google Scholar
Vir, S. (1981) Note on the relative susceptibility of different varieties of cowpea to Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 51, 813–815.Google Scholar
Vir, S. & Jindal, S.K. (1981) The oviposition and development of Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on different host species. Bulletin of Grain Technology 19, 180–184.Google Scholar
Waage, J.K. & Ng, S.M. (1984) The reproductive strategy of a parasitic wasp. I. Optimal progeny and sex allocation in Trichogramma evanescens. Journal of Animal Ecology 53, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werren, J.H. (1984) A model for sex ratio selection in parasitic wasps: local mate competition and host quality effects. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 34, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar