Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T05:41:33.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of resource limitation on competing populations of flour beetles, tribolium spp. (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Michael Nathanson
Michael Nathanson
Affiliation:
Environmental Statement Project, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Single-species and mixed-species populations of Tribolium castaneum (Hbst.) and T. confusum Duv. were followed in two experiments. Food (flour) was renewed at various intervals between 30 days and 180 days or was not renewed at all. As the interval between food renewals lengthened, single-species populations of T. confusum became extinct later than populations of T. castaneum, the survivor in mixed-species populations changed from T. castaneum to T. confusum, and the mixed-species populations became extinct later than the single-species populations. When resource is limited, therefore, populations of the two species may persist longer if they compete than if they are husbanded as single species.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allee, W. C., Emerson, A. E., Park, O., Park, T. & Schmidt, K. P. (1949). Principles of animal ecology.—837 pp. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Barker, J. S. F. & Podger, R. N. (1970). Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Effects of larval density and short-term adult starvation on fecundity, egg hatchability and adult viability.—Ecology 51, 855–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. D., & Bharadwaj, R. K. (1972). Reversed development and cellular aging in an insect.—Science, N.Y. 178, 1210–1211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birch, L. C. (1957). The meanings of competition.—Am. Nat. 91, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadhead, E. & Wapshere, A. J. (1966). Mesopsocus populations on larch in England—the distribution and dynamics of two closely-related coexisting species of Psocoptera sharing the same food resource.—Ecol. Monogr. 36, 327–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, K. (1967). Studies on interspecies competition between the azuki bean weevil, Calloso-bruchus chinensis, and the southern cowpea weevil, C. maculatus. II. Competition under different environmental conditions.—Researches Popul. Kyoto Univ. 9, 192–200.Google Scholar
Ghent, A. W. (1966). Studies of behaviour of the Tribolium flour beetles. II. Distributions in depth of T. castaneum and T. confusum in fractionable shell vials.—Ecology 47, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D. E. (1972). Density dependence and population regulation in laboratory cultures of Paramecium.—Ecology 53, 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingle, L., Wood, T. R. & Banta, A M. (1937). A study of the longevity, growth, reproduction, and heart rate in Daphnia longispina as influenced by limitations in quantity of food—J. exp. Zool. 76, 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loy, J. (1970), Behavioral responses of free-ranging rhesus monkey to food shortage.—Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 33, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. (1972). Geographical ecology.—269 pp. New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography—203 pp. Princeton, N.J., Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McCay, C. M., Sperling, G. & Barnes, L. L. (1943). Growth ageing, chronic diseases, and life span in rats.—Archs Biochem. 2, 469–479.Google Scholar
McDonald, D. J. & Davidson, L. J. (1965). Population fitness in Tribolium. I. An approach to the problem.—Am. Nat. 99, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, D. J. & Stoner, L. (1968). Population fitness in Tribolium. II. Population characteristics influencing the capacity for survival.—Am. Nat. 102, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrell, D. J. (1951). Interspecific competition between Drosophila funebris and Drosophila melanogaster.—Am. Nat. 85, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertz, D. B. (1969). Age-distribution and abundance in populations of flour beetles. I. Experimental studies.—Ecol. Monogr. 39, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertz, D. B., Park, T. & Youden, W. J. (1965). Mortality patterns in eight strains of flour beetles.—Biometrics 21, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. A. (1952). Competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Population cage experiments.—Evolution, Lancaster, Pa. 6, 407–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathanson, M. (1971). Dispersion patterns in single and mixed-species populations of the flour beetle, Tribolium.—202 pp. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Northrop, J. (1917). The effect of prolongation of the period of growth on the total duration of life.—J. biol. Chem. 32, 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T. (1962). Beetles, competition, and populations.—Science 138, 1369–1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, T., Leslie, P. H. & Mertz, D. B. (1964). Genetic strains and competition in populations of Tribolium.—Physiol. Zoöl. 37, 97–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T., Mertz, D. B. & Petrusewicz, K. (1961). Genetic strains of Tribolium: their primary characteristics.—Physiol. Zoöl. 34, 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T., Mertz, D. B. & Nathanson, M. (1968). The cannibalism of pupae by adult flour beetles.—Physiol. Zoõl. 41, 228–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T., Nathanson, M., Ziegler, J. R, & Mertz, D. B. (1970). Cannibalism of pupae by mixed-species populations of adult Tribolium.—Physiol. Zoöl. 43, 166–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimental, D. (1968). Population and genetic feedback.—Science, N.Y. 159, 1432–1437.Google Scholar
Seaton, A. P. C. & Antonovics, J. (1967). Population inter-relationships. I. Evolution in mixtures of Drosophila mutants.—Heredity, Lond. 22, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, R. K. & Karten, I. (1964). Competition among genotypes in Tribolium castaneum at varying densities and gene frequencies (the black locus).—Genetics, Princeton 49, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokoloff, A. & Cavataio, P. (1971). A comparative study of resistance to starvation in four Tribolium species.—Tribolium Info. Bull. no. 14, 86–88.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, A., Franklin, I. R. & Lakhanpal, R. K. (1966). Comparative studies with Tribolium (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae)—II: Productivity of T. castaneum (Herbst) and T. confusum Duv. on natural, semi-synthetic and synthetic diets.—J. stored Prod. Res. 1, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, A., Franklin, I. R., Overton, L. F. & Ho, F. K. (1966). Comparative studies with Tribolium (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae)—I: Productivity of T. castaneum (Herbst) and T. confusum Duv. on several commercially-available diets.—J. stored Prod. Res. 1, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwick, C. H. (1967). An experimental study of intragroup agonistic behavior in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).—Behaviour 28, 182–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M. W. & Medici, J. C. (1966). Amino acid requirements of grain beetles.—J. Nutr. 88, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior.— 625 pp. Princeton, N.J., Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Young, A. M. (1970). Predation and abundance in populations of flour beetles.—Ecology 51, 602–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar