Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-01T06:31:50.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Functional response of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): Implications for biological control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2025

Enes Pereira Barbosa
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil Emater, Claraval, MG, Brazil
Josy Aparecida dos Santos
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil São Martinho Mill, Pradópolis, SP, Brazil
Eder de Oliveira Cabral
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil
Bruno Gomes Dami
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil DND Química, Barrinha, SP, Brazil
Felipe Breda Alves
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil
Vinícius de Oliveira Lima
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil
Agda Braghini
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil Biotrop, Vinhedo, SP, Brazil
Alessandra Marieli Vacari*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, University of Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Alessandra Marieli Vacari; Email: alessandra.vacari@unifran.edu.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The predator Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) has great potential for its use in biological pest control programs. In order to assist future biological control programs that use Chrysopidae as a control agent, this research aims to study the behaviour of the green lacewing, C. externa, consuming two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). In the laboratory, experiments were carried out to determine the predation behaviour of C. externa on different densities of adults of the two-spotted spider mite, T. urticae (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 prey). For comparison purposes, the behaviour of C. externa was also studied using eggs from the alternative prey Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). The functional response was determined by logistic regression of the number of mites consumed as a function of the initial number of prey using polynomial logistic regression. The random equation was used to describe the parameters of the functional response. The predator C. externa showed a type II functional response consuming both E. kuehniella eggs and T. urticae adults. The results obtained will allow to define the best strategy for the use of green lacewings in the biological control of the two-spotted spider mite, T. urticae.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Introduction

Lacewings belonging to the Chrysoperla genus are recognised as crucial natural predators and are frequently employed in the biological management of agricultural pests (Figueiredo et al., Reference Figueiredo, Dami, Souza, Paula, Cabral, Rodriguez-Saona and Vacari2021; Liu and Chen et al., Reference Liu and Chen2024). Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) holds significance as one of the prominent lacewing species within the genus across the Americas, spanning from the southern USA to Argentina (Albuquerque et al., Reference Albuquerque, Tauber, Tauber, McEwen, New and Whittington2001; Toledo-Hernández et al., Reference Toledo-Hernández, Peña-Chora, Mancilla-Dorantes, Torres-Rojas, Romero-Ramírez, Palemón-Alberto, Ortega-Acosta, Delgado-Núñez, Salinas-Sánchez, Tagle-Emigdio and Sotelo-Leyva2024). This species possesses a remarkable adaptability to diverse climates, facilitating its widespread distribution (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Malaquias, Faria Filho, Santos and Fernandes2024).

Research on the biology of C. externa and its utilisation as a augmentative biological control has been documented since the 1970s (Albuquerque et al., Reference Albuquerque, Tauber and Tauber1994). Despite extensive investigations into the biology of C. externa over the years (Braghini et al., Reference Braghini, Lima, Dami, Souza, Barbosa, Figueiredo, Paula, Rodriguez-Saona and Vacari2024), its predatory capability against two-spotted mites remains inadequately explored. In various South American countries such as Argentina, Peru, Mexico, and Colombia, C. externa is reared in laboratories and subsequently released into agricultural environments (Acevedo et al., Reference Acevedo, Gil S, Seoane, G and Schneider2024; Cruces et al., Reference Cruces, Peña and De Clercq2024; Toledo-Hernández et al., Reference Toledo-Hernández, Peña-Chora, Mancilla-Dorantes, Torres-Rojas, Romero-Ramírez, Palemón-Alberto, Ortega-Acosta, Delgado-Núñez, Salinas-Sánchez, Tagle-Emigdio and Sotelo-Leyva2024). In Brazil, five companies are officially registered with the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply for the production of C. externa, primarily targeting the management of whiteflies and certain aphid species. However, approval for the control of two-spotted mites is still pending. Presently, lacewing releases in Brazil encompass an area of 750 thousand hectares annually, with expectations of additional companies receiving approval by the end of 2024. This approval process will facilitate the broader commercial availability of these predators.

Moreover, its broad spectrum of prey, encompassing delicate insects like aphids, whiteflies, thrips, moths, and mites, renders it suitable for various biological control initiatives (Braghini et al., Reference Braghini, Lima, Dami, Souza, Barbosa, Figueiredo, Paula, Rodriguez-Saona and Vacari2024; Carvalho et al., Reference Carvalho, Vieira, Pec and Souza2022; Luna-Espino et al., Reference Luna-Espino, Jiménez-Pérez and Castrejón-Gómez2020; Saraiva et al., Reference Saraiva, Silva, Maciel, Duarte, Alves Filho, Rodrigues, Ramos, Lira and Dias-Pini2024). The predatory effectiveness of Chrysopidae members escalates during the larval stage’s molting processes (Palomares-Perez et al., Reference Palomares-Perez, Bravo-Nunez and Arredondo-Bernal2019; Santos et al., Reference Santos, Souza and Hernandez2024). Additionally, adults sustain themselves on nectar, pollen, or insect-produced honey (Martins et al., Reference Martins, Andrade, Botti, Perez, Schmidt and Venzon2025). Furthermore, they are easily cultivated in laboratory settings (Braghini et al., Reference Braghini, Lima, Dami, Souza, Barbosa, Figueiredo, Paula, Rodriguez-Saona and Vacari2024).

Incorporating a natural antagonist, be it a predator or a parasitoid, into a biological control scheme necessitates a comprehensive grasp of its predation patterns. Insight into prey consumption holds pivotal significance for the effective integration of these organisms into biological control and integrated pest management strategies. Such understanding serves as a cornerstone for deploying efficient biological control measures (Bueno et al., Reference Bueno, Sutil, Jahnke, Carvalho, Cingolani, Colmenarez and Corniani2023).

The hypothesis of this research is that C. externa is a predator of the two-spotted mite Tetranychus urticae (Koch, 1836) (Acari: Tetranychidae) and consumes a high number of individuals at elevated prey densities. To test this hypothesis, the results were compared with the alternative prey Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller, 1879) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), commonly used in the mass breeding of natural enemies. Therefore, considering the potential of C. externa for biological pest control programs, this research was conducted to study the behaviour of the predator C. externa consuming the two-spotted mite, with the aim of producing results that can be applied in future biological control programs for this pest in strawberry cultivation.

Materials and methods

Chrysoperla externa rearing

Individuals from field collections conducted in organic coffee-growing areas in the region of Franca, São Paulo, Brazil, were transferred to the laboratory and housed in a climate-controlled room (temperature of 25 ± 1°C, photoperiod of 12L:12D, and relative humidity of 70 ± 10%). Adults from the rearing were sent to a taxonomist, Prof. Dr. Francisco José Sosa Duque, UFRA, Capitão Poço, PA, Brazil, to confirm the species and were later deposited at the Goeldi Museum, Belém, PA, Brazil. The rearing of the predator was conducted following a methodology adapted from Freitas (Reference Freitas2001), as described by Dami et al. (Reference Dami, Santos, Barbosa, Rodriguez-Saona and Vacari2023). The predator larvae were provided with E. kuehniella eggs as prey. The eggs were supplied by the Insect Rearing Laboratory of the Minas Gerais Association of Cotton Growers (AMIPA) in Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.

Tetranychus urticae rearing

A spider mite colony was obtained from organic strawberry plantations in Claraval, MG, Brazil. The colony was maintained on strawberry plants (var. Festival) placed in transparent plastic cages (60 cm wide × 60 cm long × 30 cm high). The cages were covered with voile fabric, secured with elastic gum, allowing for air circulation. The plants were kept under laboratory conditions with two 60-watt incandescent lamps providing a photoperiod of 14 h light to 10 h dark, a temperature of 25 ± 1ºC, and a relative humidity of 70 ± 10%. The plants received approximately 250 mL of water three times a week. New plants were introduced into the cages weekly.

Experimental trial

The bioassays were conducted in a room with controlled abiotic conditions (temperature of 25 ± 1°C, photoperiod of 12L:12D, and relative humidity of 70 ± 10%). The experimental arena consisted of an acrylic container (15 cm in diameter × 3 cm in height) closed with a plastic lid to prevent mites from escaping. In each arena, strawberry leaves were added with prey. The strawberry cultivar (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. ‘Albion’) used was a cultivar widely employed by organic strawberry producers and susceptible to the target pest.

To conduct the experiments, third-instar larvae of C. externa, aged 12–24 h, were utilised. These larvae were obtained from the laboratory rearing, which was maintained according to the previous description. Lacewing larvae were kept without prey for a period of 12 h before the commencement of the tests. Adults of T. urticae were used as prey at densities of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 individuals. For comparison purposes, eggs of E. kuehniella, a pest of stored products like flour, were also employed as prey. These eggs are utilised for lacewing rearing in the laboratory, and the same densities mentioned for the spider mite were used to E. kuehniella eggs. Each arena contained strawberry leaves with the specified mite densities. Arenas with E. kuehniella eggs did not contain leaves. A single third-instar lacewing larva was introduced into each arena. Mite adults obtained from rearing were used to infest strawberry leaves. Subsequently, leaves containing mite adults were used in the experiments based on the mentioned densities. The experiment was conducted using a completely randomised design.

Assessments of predation behaviour were conducted 24 h after the start of the experiment, counting the number of prey consumed per replicate at each density for the predator C. externa. Ten replications were observed for each prey density (mites and eggs). Both the T. urticae adults and the E. kuehniella eggs used in the experiments were not replaced until the end of the evaluations. To verify prey survival in the absence of the predator, the same number of replicates without a predator was established for each prey density.

Data analysis

The natural mortality of the prey without the presence of a predator was less than 5% across all experiments. Therefore, we ran our analyses without correcting for natural mortality. For each prey density combination, we calculated the number of prey attacked (N a) as a function of the initial number of prey available (N 0). N a and N 0 were then used to determine the functional response of the predator C. externa for each prey species, which was estimated to the description by Dami et al. (Reference Dami, Santos, Barbosa, Rodriguez-Saona and Vacari2023). The type of functional response was then determined by the significance and slope of the linear term (Juliano, Reference Juliano, Scheiner and Gurevitch2001). The parameters of the attack rate (a′, expressed per hour (h−1)) and handling time (T h, expressed in h (h)) of the functional response were estimated as described by Juliano et al. (Reference Juliano, Hechtel and Waters1993).

Results

Logistic regression models using the predation data were estimated to determine the type of functional response of the predator C. externa to both prey species (T. urticae and E. kuehniella). For the prey T. urticae adult, the linear parameter presented a value of −0.5125 ± 0.1011, and P < 0.0001 (Table 1). Since the linear parameter was negative and significant, this indicates that the predator C. externa, when consuming mites, exhibited a type II functional response. For E. kuehniella eggs as prey, the linear parameter had a value of −0.1550 ± 0.0357, and P < 0.0001 (Table 1). Thus, the type of functional response of C. externa preying on E. kuehniella eggs was also determined to be type II (Table 2).

Table 1. Estimated mean of the logistic regression parameters of Tetranychus urticae adults and Ephestia kuehniella eggs predated by third-instar Chrysoperla externa larva with prey densities between 1 and 64 individuals

Table 2. Mean values (95% confidence limits (CL)) of attack rate (a′, expressed in h−1), handling time (t h, expressed in h) and estimated number of prey attacked during the observation period (24 h/t h) of third-instar Chrysoperla externa larva when consuming Tetrannychus urticae adults or Ephestia kuehniella eggs

ns indicates that there is no significant difference between treatments based on overlapping 95% confidence intervals.

* indicates significant difference between treatments based on non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals.

The average number of prey attacked was proportional to the density provided to the predator C. externa. As the number of T. urticae adults and E. kuehniella eggs offered increased, the number of prey attacked also increased (Fig. 1). However, the proportion of the average number of prey attacked was inversely related to the initial density of prey offered, tending to decrease as the prey density increased (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Functional response of third-instar Chrysoperla externa larva (A and C) and the proportion of prey attacked (B and D) towards Tetranychus urticae adults and Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Mean (±SE) number (n a) of mites and eggs consumed in relation to initial prey density (n a/n 0) by third instar of predator after 24 h of exposure.

The attack rate of C. externa preying on T. urticae adults and E. kuehniella eggs over a 24-h period was not influenced by the type of prey (Table 2). The attack rate for T. urticae adults was 0.00466 (0.00275–0.00656) h⁻1, and for E. kuehniella eggs, it was 0.00293 (0.00153–0.00433) h⁻1. The handling time was influenced by the types of prey tested (Table 2). The handling time for T. urticae adults was 0.3725 (0.3115–0.4336) h, and for E. kuehniella eggs, it was 0.1737 (0.1433–0.2040) h for pupae. Consequently, a higher number of eggs were consumed within 24 h (138.17).

Discussion

This study presents the initial evidence supporting the capability of the lacewing species C. externa to readily consume adult two-spotted spider mites under laboratory conditions. Concerning the feeding behaviour of C. externa on both T. urticae adults and E. kuehniella eggs, it was observed that the functional response followed a type II pattern. This means that as the prey population increases, consumption tends to stabilise at higher densities over a 24-h period for both types of prey. At lower prey densities, fewer prey were subdued, and consumption increased with higher prey densities but did not reach a stable level. Thus, future investigations should focus on higher prey densities. This pattern is attributed to the voracious appetite of the predator C. externa (Dami et al., Reference Dami, Santos, Barbosa, Rodriguez-Saona and Vacari2023) and the small size of the mites, necessitating substantial daily consumption to satisfy the predator. Additionally, the abundance or scarcity of prey influences the behaviour of predatory arthropods (Udayakumar at el., Reference Udayakumar, Venu, Kandan, Arvind and Shivalingaswamy2024). The predator’s attack, successful prey ingestion, and subsequent conversion are crucial processes indicating the predator’s biological performance and its potential to regulate pest populations (Pocius and Kersch-Becker, Reference Pocius and Kersch-Becker2024; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Li, Song, Xie, Liu, Zhao and Peng2024).

In this initial experiment involving the predator species C. externa, observations were made regarding its ability to prey on T. urticae, revealing that the predators could consume mite adults even in the presence of a web (as noted during laboratory assessments). Regardless of the density of the prey population under investigation, C. externa exhibited substantial consumption of T. urticae within a 24-h period (averaging 64.43 prey). Predators actively foraged until they located their prey on the leaf, even when confronted with webs, a characteristic defence mechanism of this mite species. Previous findings suggested that while lacewings could potentially consume mites, the presence of webs might pose a challenge to consumption (Mena et al., Reference Mena, Mesa, Escobar and Pérez2020), and it was previously believed that adult T. urticae might not be suitable prey for lacewings (Pappas et al., Reference Pappas, Broufas and Koveos2007).

The feeding behaviour of C. externa showed no significant difference between T. urticae and E. kuehniella, indicating that even when reared on E. kuehniella eggs, the predator readily preys on mites when released into the field. C. externa demonstrated the ability to consume over 50 prey within a 24-h period. There are limited published studies on the biology and predatory habits of Chrysoperla species feeding on T. urticae, with only one study focusing on C. externa. Morando et al. (Reference Morando, Toscano, Martins, Eduardo, Maruyama and Santos2014) investigated the biology of C. externa feeding on two-spotted spider mites, highlighting its potential for controlling this pest species. Hassanpour et al. (Reference Hassanpour, Nouri-Ganbalani, Mohaghegh and Enkegaard2009) reported the functional response of a closely related species, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens, 1836), against T. urticae. They observed an estimated consumption of up to 187.5 mites, with a type II functional response for the first and second instars and a type III response for the third instar of the predator.

Experiments investigating functional responses in laboratory settings with elevated prey densities have been subject to criticism due to concerns that predation rates derived from such studies may not accurately represent natural field conditions (Choo et al., Reference Choo, Low, Ngiam and Yeo2021). Wiedenmann and O’Neil (Reference Wiedenmann and RJ1991) explored the theory that, in controlled laboratory environments, the attack rate is mainly constrained by consumption behaviour (such as handling time), whereas in natural settings, the attack rate is more influenced by search behaviour. However, various factors including host plants, climate, competition from other predators or parasitoids, the presence of alternative prey, among others, can impact the efficiency of predators (Cicero et al., Reference Cicero, Chavarin-Gómez, Pérez-Ascencio, Barreto-Barriga, Guevara, Desneux and Ramirez-Romero2024; Rostami et al., Reference Rostami, Huang, Shi, Zheng, Li, Madadi and Fu2024; Su et al., Reference Su, Chen and Zhang2024). Thus, experiments conducted under laboratory conditions offer insights into potential predator predation, contributing to the understanding of fundamental mechanisms underlying predator–prey interactions in field settings.

Conclusion

The predator C. externa exhibits a type II functional response when consuming T. urticae adults. This underscores the potential of this natural enemy as an effective biological control agent for the two-spotted spider mite, a key pest in strawberry plants.

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Bela Época farm in the region of Franca, SP, Brazil, for permitting the collection of lacewings on their organic coffee plantation. Additionally, we extend our thanks to the Cooperativa dos Agricultores Familiares de Claraval e Região, MG, Brazil, for granting permission to collect mites in an organic strawberry site. Our sincere appreciation goes to F. Sosa at the Federal Rural University of Amazon in Brazil for the valuable contribution to the identification of the species Chrysoperla externa. We also express our gratitude to AMIPA (Uberlância, MG, Brazil) for providing Ephestia kuehniella eggs to initiate rearing in the laboratory. To the Vittia Group for the master’s degree scholarship and financial support for this research. To CNPq, Fapesp (2019/18376-3) and Capes (financial code 001) for their support.

References

Acevedo, FA, Gil S, R, Seoane, S, G, M and Schneider, MI (2024) Evaluation of imidacloprid (Confidor OD®) genotoxicity in Chrysoperla externa eggs (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) through comet assay. Chemosphere 356, 141819. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141819.Google Scholar
Albuquerque, GS, Tauber, CA and Tauber, MJ (1994) Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): Life history and potential for biological control in Central and South America. Biological Control 4(1), 813. doi:10.1006/bcon.1994.1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albuquerque, GS, Tauber, CA and Tauber, MJ (2001) Chrysoperla externa and Ceraeochrysa spp: Potential for biological control in the new world tropics and subtropics. In McEwen, PK, New, TR and Whittington, AE ((eds.)), Lacewings in the Crop Environment. Crambidge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 408423.10.1017/CBO9780511666117.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braghini, A, Lima, VDO, Dami, BG, Souza, JMR, Barbosa, EP, Figueiredo, GP, Paula, WBDS, Rodriguez-Saona, C and Vacari, AM (2024) Testing the effects of prey type on the life history and population-level parameters of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Insects 15(5), 330. doi:10.3390/insects15050330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bueno, ADF, Sutil, WP, Jahnke, SM, Carvalho, GA, Cingolani, MF, Colmenarez, YC and Corniani, N (2023) Biological control as part of the soybean integrated pest management (IPM): Potential and challenges. Agronomy 13, 2532. doi:10.3390/agronomy13102532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, MMP, Vieira, DA, Pec, M and Souza, B (2022) Inter - and intraspecific relationships between Macrosiphum rosae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 66, e20220086. doi:10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2022-0086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choo, MZJ, Low, BW, Ngiam, RWJ and Yeo, DCJ (2021) Predation of mosquitos by odonates in a tropical urban environment: Insights from functional response and field mesocosm experiments. Biological Control 161, 104702. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, L, Chavarin-Gómez, LE, Pérez-Ascencio, D, Barreto-Barriga, O, Guevara, R, Desneux, N and Ramirez-Romero, R (2024) Influence of alternative prey on the functional response of a predator in two contexts: With and without intraguild predation. Insects 15(5), 315. doi:10.3390/insects15050315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruces, L, Peña, EL and De Clercq, P (2024) Advances in the integrated pest management of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A global perspective. Insects 15, 540. doi:10.3390/insects15070540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dami, BG, Santos, JA, Barbosa, EP, Rodriguez-Saona, C and Vacari, AM (2023) Functional response of 3 green lacewing species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to Leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae). Journal of Insect Science 23(3), 18. doi:10.1093/jisesa/iead038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueiredo, GP, Dami, BG, Souza, JMR, Paula, WBDS, Cabral, EDO, Rodriguez-Saona, C and Vacari, AM (2021) Releases of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) eggs for the control of the coffee leaf miner, Leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae), 2020. Arthropod Management Tests 46(1), tsab148. doi:10.1093/amt/tsab148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitas, S. 2001. Rearing of green lacewings in the laboratory. Jaboticabal: Funep, 20p.Google Scholar
Hassanpour, M, Nouri-Ganbalani, G, Mohaghegh, J and Enkegaard, A (2009) Functional response of different larval instars of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), to the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 7(2), 424428.Google Scholar
Juliano, SA (2001) Non-linear curve fitting: Predation and functional response curves. In Scheiner, SM and Gurevitch, J ((eds.)), Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments, Edn. New York: Chapman & Hall, 178196.10.1093/oso/9780195131871.003.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juliano, SA, Hechtel, LJ and Waters, JR (1993) Behavior and risk of predation in larval tree hole mosquitoes: Effects of hunger and population history of predation. Oikos 68, 229241. doi:10.2307/3544835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, TX and Chen, XX (2024) Biological control of aphids in China: Successes and prospects. Annual Review of Entomology 70. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-121423-012130.Google Scholar
Luna-Espino, HM, Jiménez-Pérez, A and Castrejón-Gómez, VR (2020) Assessment of Chrysoperla comanche (Banks) and Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) as biological control agents of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under glasshouse conditions. Insects 11(2), 87. doi:10.3390/insects11020087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, EF, Andrade, FP, Botti, JMC, Perez, AL, Schmidt, J and Venzon, M (2025) Role of a medicinal plant in attracting Chrysopidae predators and controlling Leucoptera coffeella. Crop Protection 187, 106944. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mena, YM, Mesa, NC, Escobar, A and Pérez, S (2020) Evaluation of Phytoseiidae mites and Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) on the control of Tetranychus urticae in Carica papaya L. Agronomia Colombiana 38(1), 39. doi:10.15446/agron.colomb.v38n1.73271.Google Scholar
Morando, R, Toscano, LC, Martins, GLM, Eduardo, WI, Maruyama, WI and Santos, LS (2014) Predation and development of chrysoperla externa (hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) fed on the two-spotted mite Tetranychus urticae (Koch, 1836) (Acari: Tetranychidae) from bean plants. Revista Agrarian 7(23), 4248. doi:10.30612/agrarian.v7i23.2284.Google Scholar
Palomares-Perez, M, Bravo-Nunez, M and Arredondo-Bernal, HC (2019) Functional response of Chrysoperla externa (Hagen 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) fed with Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner 1897) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 121(2), 256264. doi:10.4289/0013-8797.121.2.256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, ML, Broufas, GD and Koveos, DS (2007) Effects of various prey species on development, survival and reproduction of the predatory lacewing Dichochrysa prasina (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Biological Control 43, 163170. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocius, VM and Kersch-Becker, MF (2024) Evaluating the influence of plant defenses on prey quality as an opportunity to enhance biological control in agroecosystems. Biological Control 193, 105515. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostami, E, Huang, D-L, Shi, M-Z, Zheng, L-Z, Li, J-Y, Madadi, H and Fu, J-W (2024) Functional response and predation rate of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) at different temperatures. Journal of Economic Entomology 117(4), 14061417. doi:10.1093/jee/toae110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, JR, Souza, B and Hernandez, MMP (2024) Is Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) capable of controlling Selenothrips rubrocinctus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in rose bushes? International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 44, 737746. doi:10.1007/s42690-024-01186-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraiva, WVA, Silva, LMA, Maciel, GPS, Duarte, PM, Alves Filho, EG, Rodrigues, THS, Ramos, KAC, Lira, VA and Dias-Pini, NS (2024) Olfactory response to HIPVs and biological aspects of Chrysoperla externa intended for the biological control of Aleurodicus cocois in cashew. Biocontrol Science and Technology 116. doi:10.1080/09583157.2024.2421295.Google Scholar
Silva, BKR, Malaquias, MF, Faria Filho, RF, Santos, AVF and Fernandes, FL (2024) Spatial and dynamic distribution of Chrysoperla spp. and Leucoptera coffeella populations in coffee Coffea arabica L. Precision Agriculture 25, 327346. doi:10.1007/s11119-023-10070-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, G-F, Chen, J and Zhang, L (2024) The associational effects of host plant and mistletoe functional traits on leaf herbivory in mistletoe. Oecologia 204, 213225. doi:10.1007/s00442-023-05508-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toledo-Hernández, E, Peña-Chora, G, Mancilla-Dorantes, I, Torres-Rojas, FI, Romero-Ramírez, Y, Palemón-Alberto, F, Ortega-Acosta, , Delgado-Núñez, EJ, Salinas-Sánchez, DO, Tagle-Emigdio, LJ and Sotelo-Leyva, C (2024) A review of biological control one decade after the sorghum aphid (Melanaphis sorghi) outbreak. Plants 13, 2873.10.3390/plants13202873CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Udayakumar, A, Venu, HS, Kandan, A, Arvind, M and Shivalingaswamy, TM (2024) A predatory wasp, Carinostigmus costatus krombein (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae), its aphid prey spectrum and foraging behaviour: An ecological interplay. Phytoparasitica 52, 93. doi:10.1007/s12600-024-01215-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X, Li, W, Song, L, Xie, Z, Liu, J, Zhao, Y and Peng, Y (2024) Impact of dietary restriction on development, mating, and reproduction in the natural predator Pardosa pseudoannulata. Bulletin of Entomological Research 18. doi:10.1017/S0007485324000415.Google ScholarPubMed
Wiedenmann, RN, and RJ, O’Neil (1991) Searching behavior and time budgets of the predator Podisus maculiventris. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 60(1), 83-93. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1991.tb01525.x10.1111/j.1570-7458.1991.tb01525.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Estimated mean of the logistic regression parameters of Tetranychus urticae adults and Ephestia kuehniella eggs predated by third-instar Chrysoperla externa larva with prey densities between 1 and 64 individuals

Figure 1

Table 2. Mean values (95% confidence limits (CL)) of attack rate (a′, expressed in h−1), handling time (th, expressed in h) and estimated number of prey attacked during the observation period (24 h/th) of third-instar Chrysoperla externa larva when consuming Tetrannychus urticae adults or Ephestia kuehniella eggs

Figure 2

Figure 1. Functional response of third-instar Chrysoperla externa larva (A and C) and the proportion of prey attacked (B and D) towards Tetranychus urticae adults and Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Mean (±SE) number (na) of mites and eggs consumed in relation to initial prey density (na/n0) by third instar of predator after 24 h of exposure.