Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Mating system, mate choice and parental care in a bark beetle

  • O. Baruch (a1), Z. Mendel (a1), I. Scharf (a2) and A. R Harari (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The cypress bark beetle, Phloeosinus armatus, is a common element of the dying cypress tree system in East-Mediterranean countries. Adult beetles congregate for breeding on this ephemeral resource. We studied three traits that characterize this beetle's sexual behavior and linked them to its reproductive success: mating system, mate choice, and parental care. We found that the females are the ‘pioneering sex’, excavating the mating chamber. The average female is slightly larger than the male, and female and male body size is correlated, demonstrating size-assortative mating. The time it takes for a male to enter the mating chamber is positively correlated with female size and negatively correlated with its own size, which is perhaps responsible for this assortative mating. Males remain in the gallery during the period of oviposition, gradually leaving soon after the eggs hatch. The number of eggs laid and tunnel length are positively correlated with male body size. Finally, in the presence of both parents, more eggs are laid than when the female alone is present, demonstrating the important contribution of biparental care for reproductive success. We suggest that the interaction between a monogamous mating system, assortative mating, and biparental care contributes to reproductive success.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence Fax/Phone: +972-3-6408006 E-mail: scharfi@post.tau.ac.il
References
Hide All
AlonzoS.H. (2012) Sexual selection favours male parental care, when females can choose. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 279, 17841790.
AmmanG.D. & ColeW.E. (1983) Mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Part II: Population dynamics. General Technical Report INT-145, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service.
AnderbrantO. (1990) Gallery construction and oviposition of the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) at different breeding densities. Ecological Entomology 15, 18.
AnderssonM. (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
AnderssonM. & IwasaY. (1996) Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, 5358.
ArnqvistG., RoweL., KrupaJ.J. & SihA. (1996) Assortative mating by size: a meta-analysis of mating patterns in water striders. Evolutionary Ecology 10, 265284.
BalachowskyA.S. & ChararasC. (1961) Contribution a l’étude de Phloeosinus armatus Reitter (Coleoptera Scolytidae) nuisible au cypres dans le bassin oriental de la Méditeranée. Revue de Pathologie Végétale et d'Entomologie Agricole de France 39, 245257.
BiedermannP.H.W. & TaborskyM. (2011) Larval helpers and age polyethism in ambrosia beetles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108, 1706417069.
BerrymanA.A. (1974) Dynamics of bark beetle populations: towards a general productivity model. Environmental Entomology 3, 579585.
BondurianskyR. (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biological Reviews 76, 305339.
ByrneP.G. & RiceW.R. (2006) Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273, 917922.
CandolinU. (1998) Reproduction under predation risk and the trade-off between current and future reproduction in the threespine stickleback. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265, 11711175.
ChenH.-F., SalcedoC. & SunJ.-H. (2012) Male mate choice by chemical cues leads to higher reproductive success in a bark beetle. Animal Behaviour 83, 421427.
CrespiB.J. (1989) Causes of assortative mating in arthropods. Animal Behaviour 38, 9801000.
EmlenD.J. & OringL.W. (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215223.
GhalamborC.K., PelucS.I. & MartinT.E. (2013) Plasticity of parental care under the risk of predation: how much should parents reduce care? Biology Letters 9, 20130154.
GilbertJ.D. & ManicaA. (2015) The evolution of parental care in insects: a test of current hypotheses. Evolution 69, 12551270.
GwynneD. (2008) Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 53, 83101.
HarariA.R. & SteinitzH. (2013) The evolution of female sex pheromones. Current Zoology 59, 567576.
HarariA.R., HandlerA.M. & LandoltP.J. (1999) Size-assortative mating, male choice and female choice in the curculionid beetle Diaprepes abbreviatus . Animal Behaviour 58, 11911200.
HarariA.R., ZahaviT. & ThiéryD. (2011) Fitness cost of pheromone production in signaling female moths. Evolution 65, 15721582.
HerdmanE.J.E., KellyC.D. & GodinJ.G.J. (2004) Male mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): do males prefer larger females as mates? Ethology 110, 97111.
HoněkA. (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66, 483492.
HorváthováT., NakagawaS. & UllerT. (2011) Strategic female reproductive investment in response to male attractiveness in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279, 163170.
JacobsA.C., FairJ.M. & ZukM. (2015) Coloration, paternity, and assortative mating in western bluebirds. Ethology 121, 176186.
JiangY., BolnickD.I. & KirkpatrickM. (2013) Assortative mating in animals. American Naturalist 181, E125E138.
JonesA.G., MooreG.I., KvarnemoC., WalkerD. & AviseJ.C. (2003) Sympatric speciation as a consequence of male pregnancy in seahorses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100, 65986603.
KirkendallL.R. (1983) The evolution of mating systems in bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Zoological Journal Linnean Society 77, 293352.
KirkendallL.R., KentD.S. & RaffaK.A. (1997) Interactions among males, females and offspring in bark and ambrosia beetles: the significance of living in tunnels for the evolution of social behavior. pp. 181215 in ChoeJ.C. & CrespiB.J. (Eds) Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
KirkendallL.R., BiedermannP.H.W. & JordalB.H. (2015) Evolution and diversity of bark and ambrosia beetles. pp. 85156 in VegaF.E. & HofstetterR.W. (Eds) Bark Beetles Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species. San Diego, Elsevier.
KöllikerM. (2007) Benefits and costs of earwig (Forficula auricularia) family life. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology 61, 14891497.
McGrawL., SzekelyT. & YoungL.J. (2010) Pair bonds and parental behaviour. pp. 271301 in SzekelyT., MooreA. & KomdeurJ. (Eds) Social Behaviour: Genes, Ecology and Evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
McLainD.K., PrattA.E. & ShureD.J. (2015) Size dependence of courtship effort may promote male choice and strong assortative mating in soldier beetles. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology 69, 883894.
MendelZ. (1984) Life history of Phloeonsinus armatus Reiter and P. aubei Perris (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Israel. Phytoparasitica 12, 8997.
NilssonJ.Å. & SvenssonE. (1996) The cost of reproduction: a new link between current reproduction effort and future reproductive success. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263, 711714.
PennacchioF., DantiR., BenassaiD., SquarciniM., MarzialiL., Di LonardoV. & RoversiP.F. (2013) A new additional record of Phloeosinus armatus Reitter from Italy (Coleoptera Curculionidae Scolytinae). Redia 96, 4550.
PittC., RobertJ.A., BonnettT.R., KeelingC.I., BohlmannJ. & HuberD.P.W. (2014) Proteomics indicators of the rapidly shifting physiology from whole mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), adults during early host colonization. PLoS ONE 9, e110673.
PureswaranD.S. & BordenJ.H. (2003) Is bigger better? Size and pheromone production in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour 16, 765782.
RaffaK.F., PhillipsT.W. & SalomS.M. (1993) Strategies and mechanisms of host colonization by bark beetles. pp. 103128 in SchowalterT.D. & FilipG.M. (Eds) Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests. San Diego, USA, Academic Press.
RatnieksF.L.W. (1996) Evolution of unstable and stable biparental care. Behavioral Ecology 7, 490493.
RebarD. & RodríguezR.L. (2015) Insect mating signal and mate preference phenotypes covary among host plant genotypes. Evolution 69, 602610.
ReidM.L. & BaruchO. (2010) Mutual mate choice by mountain pine beetles: size-dependence but not size-assortative mating. Ecological Entomology 35, 6976.
ReidM.L. & RoitbergB.D. (1994) Benefits of prolonged male residence with mates and brood in pine engravers (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Oikos 70, 140148.
ReidM.L. & RoitbergB.D. (1995) Effects of brood size on investment in individual broods by male pine engravers (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 73, 13961401.
RenaultD., HanceT., VannierG. & VernonP. (2003) Is body size an influential parameter in determining the duration of survival at low temperatures in Alphitobius diaperinus Panzer (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)? Journal of Zoology 259, 381388.
RobertsonI.C. (1998) Paternal care enhances male reproductive success in pine engraver beetles. Animal Behaviour 56, 595602.
RobertsonI.C. & RoitbergB.D. (1998) Duration of parental care in pine engraver beetles: why do larger males care less? Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology 43, 379386.
RoquesA. & BattistiA. (1999) Cypress pests. pp. 7395 in Du CrosE.T., DucreyM., BarthelemyD., PichotC., GianniniR., RaddiP., RoquesA., SalesL.J. & ThibautB. (Eds) Cypress. A Practical Handbook. Florence, Italy, Studio Lenonardo.
RoyleN.J., SmisethP.T. & KöllikerM. (2012) The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Saldamando-BenjumeaC.I., Estrada-PiedrahítaK., Velásquez-VélezM.I. & BaileyR.I. (2014) Assortative mating and lack of temporality between corn and rice strains of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) from Central Colombia. Journal of Insect Behaviour 27, 555566.
SalomonM., SchneiderJ. & LubinY. (2005) Maternal investment in a spider with suicidal maternal care, Stegodyphus lineatus (Araneae, Eresidae). Oikos 109, 614622.
ScharfI., PeterF. & MartinO.Y. (2013) Reproductive trade-offs and direct costs for males in arthropods. Evolutionary Biology 40, 169184.
ScharfI., GalkinN. & HalleS. (2015) Disentangling the consequences of growth temperature and adult acclimation temperature on starvation and thermal tolerance in the red flour beetle. Evolutionary Biology 42, 5462.
SchlyterF. & CederholmI. (1981) Separation of the sexes of living spruce bark beetles, Ips typographus (L.), (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 92, 4247.
ShimadaK. & MaekawaK. (2011) Description of the basic features of parent offspring stomodeal trophallaxis in the subsocial wood-feeding cockroach Salganea esakii (Dictyoptera, Blaberidae, Panesthiinae). Entomological Science 14, 912.
SkinnerA.M.J. & WattP.J. (2007) Phenotypic correlates of spermatozoon quality in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata . Behavioral Ecology 18, 4752.
SowigP. (1996) Duration and benefits of biparental brood care in the dung beetle Onthophagus vacca (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecological Entomology 21, 8186.
StockA.J., PrattT.L. & BordenJ.H. (2013) Seasonal flight pattern of the western balsam bark beetle, Dryocoetes confusus Swaine (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in central British Columbia. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 110, 2734.
SuzukiS. (2013) Biparental care in insects: paternal care, life history, and the function of the nest. Journal of Insect Science 13, 131.
TealeS.A., HagerB.J. & WebsterF.X. (1994) Pheromone-based assortative mating in a bark beetle. Animal Behaviour 48, 569578.
TriversR.L. (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. pp. 136179 in CampbellB. (Ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971. Chicago, Aldine.
TrumboS.T. (2006) Infanticide, sexual selection and task specialization in a biparental burying beetle. Animal Behaviour 72, 11591167.
TrumboS.T. (2012) Patterns of parental care in invertebrates. pp. 81100 in RoyleN.J., SmisethP.T. & KöllikerM. (Eds) The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
WongB.B.M. (2004) Superior fighters make mediocre fathers in the pacific blue-eye fish. Animal Behaviour 67, 583590.
WongB.B.M. & CandolinU. (2005) How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biological Reviews 80, 559571.
WongJ.W.Y., MeunierJ. & KöllikerM. (2013) The evolution of parental care in insects: the roles of ecology, life history and the social environment. Ecological Entomology 38, 123137.
ZehD.W. & SmithR.L. (1985) Paternal investment by terrestrial arthropods. American Zoologist 25, 785805.
ZinkA.G. (2003) Quantifying the costs and benefits of parental care in female treehoppers. Behavioral Ecology 14, 687693.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bulletin of Entomological Research
  • ISSN: 0007-4853
  • EISSN: 1475-2670
  • URL: /core/journals/bulletin-of-entomological-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 180 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th April 2017 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.