Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:41:14.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mesoclanis seed flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Chrysanthemoides (Asteraceae) in South Africa: distribution, attack strategy and impact on seed production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P.B. Edwards
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
E.M. Brown
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

Abstract

Three species of Mesoclanis flies that attack the developing seeds of Chrysanthemoides monilifera in South Africa are being assessed for their potential as biological control agents of C. monilifera in Australia. Surveys in South Africa indicated that M. polana Munro is restricted to C. m. rotundata along the subtropical northern coast, M. magnipalpis Bezzi and M. dubia Walker occur on all three subspecies sampled (C. m. rotundata, C. m. monilifera, C. m. pisifera), although M. dubia is less abundant and has a more restricted distribution than M. magnipalpis. Mesoclanis eggs are laid into a wide range of flowerhead stages of C. m. rotundata over a period of approximately 12–14 days, from very small flowerheads with involucral bracts still completely closed, to flowerheads with the laminae of ray florets (petals) starting to elongate. Levels of oviposition by M. magnipalpis into C. m. pisifera are low in very young flowerheads, possibly as a consequence of a heavy layer of indumentum on young C. m. pisifera flowerheads. The pattern and location of feeding and pupation within flowerheads differs slightly for the three Mesoclanis species, but none of the species is associated with the formation of gall tissue. The effect of Mesoclanis activity on ovule development was assessed on four occasions. Mesoclanis destroyed all the ovules in some capitula, and the maximum level of ovule destruction recorded for a site was 64%.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1954) Climate of South Africa. Part 1. Climate statistics. WB19. Weather Bureau, Department of Transport. Government Printer, Pretoria, Union of South Africa.Google Scholar
Berube, D.E. (1980) Interspecific competition between Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae) for ovipositional sites on diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa: Compositae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 90, 299306.Google Scholar
Bremer, K. (1994) Asteraceae cladistics and classification. Oregon, Timber Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, P.B. (in press) Seasonal abundance and parasitism of Mesoclanis seed flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South Africa, and implications for the biological control of Chrysanthemoides monilifera (Asteraceae) in Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research.Google Scholar
Harris, P. (1989a) Feeding strategy, coexistence and impact of insects in spotted knapweed capitula. pp. 3947in Delfosse, E.S. (Ed.) Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds,6–11 March 1988,Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Harris, P. (1989b) The use of Tephritidae for the biological control of weeds. Biocontrol News and Information 10, 716Google Scholar
Julien, M.H. (Ed.) (1992) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. 3rd edn.Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Lalonde, R.G. & Roitberg, B.D. (1992) Field studies of seed predation in an introduced weedy thistle. Oikos 65, 363370.Google Scholar
Munro, H.K. (1950) Trypetid flies (Diptera) associated with the Calendulae, plants of the family Compositae in South Africa. 1. A bio-taxonomic study of the genus Mesoclanis. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 13, 3752.Google Scholar
Neser, S. & Morris, M.J. (1985) Preliminary observations on natural enemies of Chrysanthemoides monilifera in South Africa, pp. 105109in Love, A. & Dyason, R. (Eds) Bitou bush and boneseed: proceedings of a conference on Chrysanthemoides monilifera.Port Macquarie New South Wales,8–9 August 1984.Google Scholar
Noble, I.R. & Weiss, P.W. (1989) Movement and modelling of buried seed of the invasive perennial Chrysanthemoides monilifera in coastal dunes and biological control. Australian journal of Ecology 14, 5564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norlindh, T. (1943) Studies in the Calenduleae. I. Monograph of the genera Dimorphotheca, Castalis, Osteospermum, Gibbaria and Chrysanthemoides. Gleerup, Lund.Google Scholar
Rivero-Lynch, A.P. & Jones, T.H. (1993) The choice of oviposition site by Terellia ruficauda on Cirsium palustre. Acta Oecologia 14, 643651.Google Scholar
Straw, N.A. (1989) Taxonomy, attack strategies and host relations in flowerhead Tephritidae: a review. Ecological Entomology 14, 455462.Google Scholar
Weiss, P.W. (1986) The biology of Australian weeds 14. Chrysanthemoides monilifera (L.) T. Norl. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 52, 127134.Google Scholar
Weiss, P.W. & Milton, S.J. (1984) Chrysanthemoides monilifera and Acacia longifolia in Australia and South Africa, pp. 159160in Dell, B. (Ed.) Medecos IV Proceedings of the 4th International conference on Mediterranean Ecosystems.Perth, Western AustraliaAugust 13–17 1984.Botany Department, Nedlands, Western Australia.Google Scholar
White, I.M. (1988) Tephritid flies Diptera: Tephritidae. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Vol. 10, Part 5a, Barnard, P.C. & Askew, R.R. (Eds). British Museum, London.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. (1985) Insects and thistle heads: resource utilization and guild structure, pp. 407416in Delfosse, E.S. (Ed.) Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds,19–25 August 1984.Vancouver, Canada.Agriculture Canada.Google Scholar