Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:05:55.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Relative Value of Parasites and Predators in the Biological Control of Insect Pests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. R. Thompson
Affiliation:
Imperial Bureau of Entomology.

Extract

The factors responsible for the biological control of insect pests fall into three main groups. The first group includes the micro-organisms (Protozoa, Bacteria, and Fungi) producing what is ordinarily called disease; the second comprises the entomophagous insects which lead, during part or all of their life-history (generally during the larval stage only) a parasitic existence, while the third contains a great assemblage of animals of various kinds which agree in being carnivorous in habit and are known as predators. It is difficult to formulate definitions of parasite and predator which are applicable to all cases. The most satisfactory general distinction is perhaps the one recently suggested by E. Rabaud (1928), who restricts the term “parasite” to species which remain permanently attached to a living host, and considers as predators all species which come into contact with the host organism only at feeding time. Each of these categories can be subdivided, according to the effect the parasite or predator exerts upon its host, into sublethal or benignant and lethal or malignant species. Few, if any, of the parasitic entomophagous insects are of the sublethal type, the species whose habits correspond most closely to the definition being perhaps the bee-louse (Braula coeca, Nitzsch), which, however, is rather a commensal than a parasite. A few parasitic insects, such as some of the dipterous parasites of Orthoptera and Dermaptera (Thrixion halidayanum, Rond., on Leptynia hispanica, Bol.— v. Pant el 1897; Rhacodineura antiqua, Meig. on Forficula auricularia, L.—v. Thompson 1928) do not actually kill their host before issuing, but it dies usually within a relatively short time. In the majority of cases the host is destroyed before the parasite has completed its larval development. Benignant predacious entomophaga are also uncommon among the Arthropods. Certain Chironomids, Simuliids and even Culicids suck the blood of caterpillars, adult dragonflies, moths and butterflies, and other insects, without necessarily killing them (v. Edwards 1923) ; but, in general, the entomophagous insect and Arachnid predators, being as large as or larger than their hosts, cause death, as do the vertebrate predators.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burgess, A. F. 1911. Calosoma sycophanta, its life-history, behaviour and successful colonization in New England.—U.S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent., Bull. no. 101.Google Scholar
Burgess, A. F. & Collins, C. W. 1915. The Calosoma beetle (Calosoma sycophanta) in New England.—U.S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent., Bull. no 251.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1916. Life-history and feeding habits of a series of California Coccinellidae.—Univ. Calif. Tech. Publ. i, no. 6, pp. 251299. Berkeley, Cal.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. 1923. New and old observations on Ceratopogonine Midges attacking other insects.—Ann. Trop. Med. & Parasit., Liverpool, xvii.Google Scholar
Elton, C. 1927. Animal Ecology, London.Google Scholar
Herrick, G. W. 1925. Manual of Injurious insects, New York.Google Scholar
Howard, L. O. & Fiske, W. F. 1912. The importation into the United States of the parasites of the Gipsy Moth and the Browntail Moth.U.S. Dept. Agric., Bur. Ent., Bull. no. 91.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. 1925. A general text book of entomology. London.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, T. W. 1927. The Common Coffee Mealy-Bug in Kenya Colony.—Dept. Agric. Kenya, Nairobi, Bull. no. 18.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. L. 19161917. Syrphidae of Maine, Maine Agr. Exp. Sta., Bulls. 253 and 263. Orono, Me.Google Scholar
Pantel, J. 1897. Le Thrixion halidayanum Rond.—La Cellule, xv.Google Scholar
Phillips, E. F. 1925. The bee-louse, Braula coeca, in the United States.—U.S. Dept. Agric., Dept. Circ. 334.Google Scholar
Rabaud, E. 1928. Parasitisme et Evolution.—Revue Philosophique, Paris, cv.Google Scholar
Sanderson, E. D. 1902. Insects injurious to staple crops. New York and London.Google Scholar
Schilder, F. A. & Schilder, M. 1928. Die Nahrung der Coccinelliden und ihre Beziehung zur Verwandtschaft der Arten.—Arb. biol. Reichsanst, Berlin, xvi.Google Scholar
Simanton, F. L. 1916. Hyperaspis binotata, a predatory enemy of the Terrapin Scale.—J. Agric. Res., Dept. Agric., vi, no. 5, Washington, D.C., pp. 197203.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1928. A contribution to the study of the Dipterous parasites of the European Earwig.—Parasitology, xx, no. 2.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1926. The Insects of Australia and New Zealand. Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar