Skip to main content

Pseudogenes and DNA-based diet analyses: a cautionary tale from a relatively well sampled predator-prey system

  • G. Dunshea (a1) (a2), N.B. Barros (a3), R.S. Wells (a4), N.J. Gales (a2), M.A. Hindell (a1) and S.N. Jarman (a2)...

Mitochondrial ribosomal DNA is commonly used in DNA-based dietary analyses. In such studies, these sequences are generally assumed to be the only version present in DNA of the organism of interest. However, nuclear pseudogenes that display variable similarity to the mitochondrial versions are common in many taxa. The presence of nuclear pseudogenes that co-amplify with their mitochondrial paralogues can lead to several possible confounding interpretations when applied to estimating animal diet. Here, we investigate the occurrence of nuclear pseudogenes in fecal samples taken from bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) that were assayed for prey DNA with a universal primer technique. We found pseudogenes in 13 of 15 samples and 1–5 pseudogene haplotypes per sample representing 5–100% of all amplicons produced. The proportion of amplicons that were pseudogenes and the diversity of prey DNA recovered per sample were highly variable and appear to be related to PCR cycling characteristics. This is a well-sampled system where we can reliably identify the putative pseudogenes and separate them from their mitochondrial paralogues using a number of recommended means. In many other cases, it would be virtually impossible to determine whether a putative prey sequence is actually a pseudogene derived from either the predator or prey DNA. The implications of this for DNA-based dietary studies, in general, are discussed.

Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence Fax: (+61) 36 232 3449 E-mail:
Hide All
Bensasson D., Zhang D., Hartl D.L. & Hewitt G.M. (2001) Mitochondrial pseudogenes: evolution's misplaced witnesses. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16(6), 314321.
Blankenship L.E. & Yayanos A.A. (2005) Universal primers and PCR of gut contents to study marine invertebrate diets. Molecular Ecology 14(3), 891899.
Burk A., Douzery J.P. & Springer M.S. (2002) The secondary structure of mammalian mitochondrial 16S rRNA molecules: refinements based on a comparative phylogenetic approach. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 9(3), 225252.
Casper R.M., Jarman S.N., Gales N.J. & Hindell M.A. (2007) Combining DNA and morphological analyses of fecal samples improves insight into trophic interactions: a case study using a generalist predator. Marine Biology 152(4), 815825.
Collura R.V. & Stewart C. (1995) Insertions and duplications of mtDNA in the nuclear genomes of Old World monkeys and hominoids. Nature 378, 485489.
Deagle B.E., Eveson J.P. & Jarman S.N. (2006) Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples − a case study on DNA in faeces. Frontiers in Zoology 3 (11), 10.1186/1742-9994-3-11.
Dunshea G. (in review) DNA-based diet analysis for any predator. Marine Ecology Resources.
Edgar R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5), 17921797.
Gonzalez J.M., Zimmermann J. & Saiz-Jimenez C. (2004) Evaluating putative chimeric sequences from PCR amplified products. Bioinformatics 21(3), 333337.
Hajibabaei M., Smith A., Janzen D.H., Rodriguez J., Whitfield J.B. & Hebert P.D.N. (2006) A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 959964.
Harper G.L., King R.A., Dodd C.S., Harwood J.D., Glen D.M., Bruford M.W. & Symondson W.O.C. (2005) Rapid screening of invertebrate predators for multiple prey DNA targets. Molecular Ecology 14(3), 819827.
Huber J.A., Butterfield D.A. & Baross J.A. (2002) Temporal changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68(4), 15851594.
Jarman S.N., Deagle B.E. & Gales N.J. (2004) Group-specific polymerase chain reaction for DNA-based analysis of species diversity and identity in dietary samples. Molecular Ecology 13, 13131322.
Juen A. & Traugott M. (2005) Detecting predation and scavenging by DNA gut-content analysis: a case study using a soil insect predator-prey system. Oecologia 142(3), 344352.
Kumar S., Tamura K. & Nei M. (2004) MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5, 150163.
Lopez J.V., Yuhki N., Masuda R., Modi W. & O'brien S.J. (1994) Numt, a recent transfer and tandem amplification of mitochondrial DNA to the nuclear genome of the domestic cat. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39(2), 174190.
Mirol P.M., Mascheretti S. & Searle J.B. (2000) Multiple nuclear pseudogenes of mitochondrial cytochrome b in Ctenomys (Caviomorpha, Rodentia) with either great similarity to or high divergence from the true mitochondrial sequence. Heredity 84, 538547.
Olsen L.E. & Yoder A.D. (2002) Using secondary structure to identify ribosomal numts: cautionary examples from the human genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19(1), 93100.
Pereira S.L. & Baker A.J. (2004) Low number of mitochondrial pseudogenes in the chicken (Gallus gallus) nuclear genome: implications for molecular inference of population history and phylogenetics. BMC Evolutionary Biology 4(17), doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-17.
Perna N.T. & Kocher T.D. (1996) Mitochondrial DNA: Molecular fossils in the nucleus. Current Biology 6(2), 128129.
Poulakakis N., Lymberakis P., Paragamian K. & Mylonas M. (2005) Isolation and amplification of shrew DNA from barn owl pellets. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85(3), 331340.
Purcell M., Mackey G., LaHood E., Huber H. & Park L. (2004) Molecular methods for the genetic identification of salmonid prey from Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardsi) scat. Fishery Bulletin 102(1), 213220.
R Development Core Team (2006) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-7-0. URL
Richly E. & Leister D. (2004) NUMTs in Sequenced Eukaryotic Genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(6), 10811084.
Rubinoff D., Cameron S. & Will K. (2006) A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for “barcoding” identification. Journal of Heredity 97(6), 581594.
Sambrook J., Fritsch E.F. & Maniatis T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual. 1659 pp. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Sorenson M.D. & Fleischer R.C. (1996) Multiple independent trans-positions of mitochondrial DNA control region sequences to the nucleus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 1523915243.
Symondson W.O.C. (2002) Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Molecular Ecology 11(4), 627641.
Thalmann O., Hebler J., Poinar H.N., Paabo S. & Vigilant L. (2004) Unreliable mtDNA data due to nuclear insertions: a cautionary tale from analysis of humans and other great apes. Molecular Ecology 13, 321335.
Wells R.S., Rhinehart H.L., Hansen L.J., Sweeny J.C., Townsend F.I., Stone R., Casper D.R., Scott M.D., Hohn A.A. & Rowles T.K. (2004) Bottlenose dolphins as marine ecosystem sentinels: developing a health monitoring system. EcoHealth 1, 246254.
Woischnick M. & Moraes C.T. (2002) Pattern of Organization of Human Mitochondrial Pseudogenes in the Nuclear Genome. Genome Research 12, 885893.
Zischler H. (2000) Nulcear integrations of mitochondrial DNA in primates: inferences of associated mutational events. Electrophoresis 21, 531536.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bulletin of Entomological Research
  • ISSN: 0007-4853
  • EISSN: 1475-2670
  • URL: /core/journals/bulletin-of-entomological-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 9 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 97 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.