Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Suction sampling as a significant source of error in molecular analysis of predator diets

  • R.A. King (a1), J.S. Davey (a1), J.R. Bell (a1) (a2), D.S. Read (a1), D.A. Bohan (a2) and W.O.C. Symondson (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract

The molecular detection of predation is a fast growing field, allowing highly specific and sensitive detection of prey DNA within the gut contents or faeces of a predator. Like all molecular methods, this technique is prone to potential sources of error that can result in both false positive and false negative results. Here, we test the hypothesis that the use of suction samplers to collect predators from the field for later molecular analysis of predation will lead to high numbers of false positive results. We show that, contrary to previous published work, the use of suction samplers resulted in previously starved predators testing positive for aphid and collembolan DNA, either as a results of ectopic contamination or active predation in the collecting cup/bag. The contradictory evidence for false positive results, across different sampling protocols, sampling devices and different predator-prey systems, highlights the need for experimentation prior to mass field collections of predators to find techniques that minimise the risk of false positives.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence Fax: +44 (0) 1392 263434 E-mail: R.A.King@exeter.ac.uk
References
Hide All
K.D. Sunderland , W. Powell & W.O.C. Symondson (2005) Populations and communities. pp. 299434in M.A. Jervis (Ed.) Insects as Natural Enemies: A Practical Perspective. Berlin, Germany, Springer.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bulletin of Entomological Research
  • ISSN: 0007-4853
  • EISSN: 1475-2670
  • URL: /core/journals/bulletin-of-entomological-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 83 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.