Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T07:41:33.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A technique for initiating cutaneous myiasis (flystrike) on sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E.C. Steiner ,
S.A. Harrington ,
K.V. Watson  and
N. Monzu
E.C. Steiner*
Affiliation:
Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Perth, Australia
S.A. Harrington
Affiliation:
Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Perth, Australia
K.V. Watson
Affiliation:
Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Perth, Australia
N. Monzu
Affiliation:
Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Perth, Australia
*
E.C. Steiner, Entomology Branch, Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Baron Hay Court, South Perth WA. 6151.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A technique for initiating artificial strikes on sheep using eggs or larvae of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) under controlled conditions is described. A liver based implant provides protein for initial larval development. The technique has been found to produce viable strikes more reliably than other currently-used methods for the purpose of screening insecticides in controlled experiments.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 115 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dallwitz, R. (1987) Density independence of survival in myiasis breeding of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisemann, C.H., Johnston, L.A.Y. & Kerr, J.D. (1989) New techniques for measuring the growth and survival of larvae of Lucilia cuprina on sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 66, 187–189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiedler, O.G.H. & Du Toit, R. (1951) A new biological method for evaluating the efficiency of insecticides for the protection of sheep against blowfly strike. Nature, London, 168, 608–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freney, M.R., Mackerras, I.M. & Mackerras, M.J. (1935) A note on new dressings for fly-struck sheep. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Australia 8, 161–168.Google Scholar
Harrison, P.M. & Rundle, J.C. (1983) The mechanism and importance of larvicide translocation on wool. pp. 180–185in Raadsma, H.W. (Ed.) Sheep blowfly and flystrike in sheep. Sydney, NSW Department of Agriculture (Proceedings. Second National Symposium).Google Scholar
Hart, R.J., Cavey, W.A., Ryan, K.J., Strong, M.B., Moore, B., Thomas, P.L., Boray, J.C. & von Orelli, M. (1982) CGA-72662–a new sheep blowfly insecticide. Australian Veterinary Journal 59, 104–109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levot, G.W. & Hughes, P.B. (1990) In vitro and in vivo studies on the effects of flystrike dressings on larvae of Lucilia cuprina. Australian Veterinary Journal 67, 337–338.Google Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1937) The experimental production of cutaneous myiasis of sheep Parasitology 29, 526–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, I.J., Green, P.E., Connell, J.A. & Hopkins, P.S. (1980) Immunoglobulin G antibodies to the antigens of Lucilia cuprina in the sera of fly-struck sheep. Australian Journal of Biological Science 33, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, I.J., Green, P.E., Connell, J.A. & Hopkins, P.S. (1981) Immunization of sheep with larval antigens of Lucilia cuprina. Australian Journal of Biological Science 34, 411–417.Google Scholar
Sandeman, R.M. (1990) Prospects for the controlof sheep blowfly strike by vaccination. International Journal for Parasitology 20, 537–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandeman, R.M., Dowse, C.A. & Carnegie, P.R. (1985) Initial characterisation of the sheep immune response to infections of Lucilia cuprina. International Journal for Parasitology 15, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandeman, R.M.Bowles, V.M.Stacey, I.N. & Carnegie, P.R. (1986) Acquired resistance in sheep to infection with larvae of the blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. International Journal for Parasitology 16, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanahan, G.J. & Hughes, P.B. (1979) The history and significance of insecticide resistance in field populations of the primary sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. pp. 69–78 in National Symposium on the sheep blowfly and flystrike in sheep (New South Wales Department of Agriculture).Google Scholar
Shanahan, G.J. & Roxburgh, N.A. (1975) Comparative ability of hybrid and homozygous resistant larvae of Lucilia cuprina to cause strikes under experimental conditions Australian Veterinary Journal 51, 320–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stones, L.C. (1951) A comparative method for testing agents used in sheep maggot fly control. Bulletin of Entomological Research 41, 503–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, M.J., Foster, G.G., Vogt, W.G., Kitching, R.L., Woodburn, T.L. & Konovalov, C. (1977) Current status of genetic control of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). pp. 129–139 in Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Entomology, Washington DC.Google Scholar