Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T22:50:33.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A technique for tethering females of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to evaluate pheromone control methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E. M. McVeigh ,
L. J. McVeigh  and
G. G. Cavanagh
E. M. McVeigh
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, College House, Wrights Lane London W8 5SJ, UK
L. J. McVeigh
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, College House, Wrights Lane London W8 5SJ, UK
G. G. Cavanagh
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, College House, Wrights Lane London W8 5SJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A fast and simple method of preparing virgin females of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) for exposure in the field is described. Low predation rates were achieved by tethering the moths on a short (20 cm) piece of cotton thread directly to the plants and by keeping unnecessary daytime exposure to a minimum. Consistently high levels of successful mating were recorded in both berseem and cotton fields in Egypt, suggesting the suitability of the tethering technique for measuring reduction of mating levels in pheromone control trials.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 441 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brooks, T. W.Doane, C. C. & Haworth, J. K. (1979). Suppression of Peclinophora gossypiella with sex pheromone. — Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. 3, 853–866.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G.Bettany, B. W.Nesbitt, B. F.Beevor, P. S.Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1974 a). Field studies of the female sex pheromone of the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) in Cyprus. — Bull. enl. Res. 64, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G., Bettany, B. W. & Steedman, R. A. (1974 b). The arrival of male moths of the cotton leaf–worm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) at a new continuously recording pheromone trap. — Bull. ent. Res. 64, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G.Ellis, P. E.Hunter–Jones, P.Mckinley, D. J.Mcveigh, L. J.Murlis, J.Paton, E. M.Brimacombe, L.Bettany, B. W.Cavanagh, G. G. & Jordan, J. (1980). COPR Core Programme Projects 9, 25 and 32. Pheromones and viruses in the control of the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and trials with pheromones of the olive moth Prays oleae (Bern.) in Crete. Report for 1977. — 130 pp. London, Trop. Dev. Res. Inst.Google Scholar
Ellis, P. E. & Brimacombe, L. C. (1980). The mating behaviour of the Egyptian cotton leafworm moth, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). — Anim. Behav. 28, 1239–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatehouse, A. G. & Hackett, D. S. (1980). A technique for studying flight behaviour of tethered Spodoptera exempta moths. — Physiol. Entomol. 5, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosny, M. M., Iss-hak, R. R.Nasr, E. l., Sayed, A.El-deeb, Y. A.Critchley, B. R.Topper, C. & Campion, D. G. (1979). Mass trapping for the control of Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) in Egypt. — Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. 2, 395–400.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, M.Wada, T. & Inoue, H. (1981). A comparison of communication disruption technique and mass-trapping technique for controlling moths using sex pheromone of Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). — pp. 32–40 in 1st Japan/USA Symposium on integrated pest management, Tsukuba (Japan). Sept. 29–30.Google Scholar
McNally, P. S. & Barnes, M. M. (1981). Effects of codling moth pheromone trap placement, orientation and density on trap catches. — Environ. Entomol. 10, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVeigh, L. J.Paton, E. M. & Hall, D. R. (1979). Factors affecting the performance of pheromone traps for male Spodoptera littoralis. — Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. 2, 409–419.Google Scholar
Oyama, M. (1977). Mating suppression of Spodoptera litura (F.) by (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate. — Appl. Entomol. & Zool. 12, 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. (1981). Attractive and aggregating pheromones. — pp. 215–235in Nordlund, D. A.Jones, R. L. & Lewis, W. J. (Eds.). Semiochemicals: their role in pest control. — 306 pp. New York, J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rothschild, G. H. L. (1981). Mating disruption of lepidopterous pests: current status and future prospects. — pp. 207–228in Mitchell, E. R. (Ed). Management of insect pests with semiochemicals. Concepts and practice. — 514 pp. New York. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. O. & Seabrook, W. D. (1981). Tethered moths as a measure of mating disruption in sex pheromone atmospheric permeation studies. — J. Georgia entomol. Soc. 16, 60–64.Google Scholar
Snow, J. W.Raulston, J. R. & Guillot, F. S. (1976). Mating tables: a method of studying the mating and the competitive behavior of Lepidoptera and Diptera in the field. — Ann. enl. Soc. Am. 9,751–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teich, I.Neumark, S.Jacobson, M.Klug, J.Shani, A. & Waters, R. M. (1979). Mass trapping of males of Egyptian cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis) and large-scale synthesis of prodlure. — pp. 343–350 in Ritter, F. J (Ed.). Chemical ecology: odour communication in animals. — 427 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar