Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T00:36:50.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forms of low degree in finite fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Morris Orzech
Morris Orzech
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is known that diagonal forms over a finite field have non-trivial zeros if the number of variables, or the size of the field, is large enough. We consider diagonal forms of degree up to five in cases where the size hypotheses are not satisfied. There are finitely many fields not covered by the known results, but a direct computational test of all possible equations is impractical. We describe means of cutting down considerably on the number of fields and the number of equations for which there exist diagonal forms, of degree up to 5 and in 3 variables, with no non-trivial zero.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , August 1984 , pp. 45 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1984

References

[1]Gray, J. F., “Diagonal forms of odd degree over a finite field”, Michigan Math. J. 7 (1960), 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Hua, L. K. and Vandiver, H. S., “Characters over certain types of rings, with applications to the theory of equations in a finite field”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 35 (1949), 94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Ireland, K. and Rosen, M. I., Elements of number theory (Bogden and Quigley, Tarrytown-on-Hudson, N.Y., 1972).Google Scholar
[4]Joly, J.-R., “Équations et variétiés algébrlques sur un corps fini”, L'Enseignement Math. 19 (1973), 1–117.Google Scholar
[5]Lewis, D. J., “Cubic congruences”, Michigan Math. J. 4 (1957), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Mazur, B., “Eigenvalues of Frobenius acting on algebraic varieties over a finite field”, in Algebraic geometry – Arcata 1974, 231–262 (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, No. 29, Amer. Math. Soc. Providence, R.I., 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Schmidt, W.M., Equations over finite fields – an elementary approach (Lecture Notes in Mathematics No. 536. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Small, C., “Sums of powers in large finite fields”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 65 (1977), 35–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Tietäiväinen, A., “On the non-trivial solvability of some equations and systems of equation in finite fields”, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I 360 (1965), 6–38.Google Scholar
[10]Weil, A., “Number of solutions of equations in a finite field”. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 55 (1949), 497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar