Hostname: page-component-7d8f8d645b-dvxft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-05-28T19:58:27.758Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English

Invexity of supremum and infimum functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Nguyen Xuan Ha  and
Do Van Luu
Nguyen Xuan Ha
Affiliation:
Institute of Cryptographic Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
Do Van Luu
Affiliation:
P.O. Box 631, Bo Ho, 10000 Hanoi, Vietnam
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Under suitable assumptions we establish the formulas for calculating generalised gradients and generalised directional derivatives in the Clarke sense of the supremum and the infimum of an infinite family of Lipschitz functions. From these results we derive the results ensuring such a supremum or infimum are an invex function when all functions of the invex. Applying these results to a class of mathematical programs, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for optimality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 289 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2002

References

[1]Ben-Israel, A. and Mond, B., ‘What is invexity?’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 28 (1986), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Berge, C., Espaces topologiques, fonctions multivoques, (Deuxième édition) (Dunod, Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
[3]Clarke, F.H., Optimization and nonsmooth analysis, Canadian Math. Soc. Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
[4]Craven, B.D., ‘Invex function and constrained local minima’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 24 (1981), 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Craven, B.D. and Glover, B.M., ‘Invex functions and duality’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 39 (1985), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Craven, B.D., Luu, D.V., ‘Constrained minimax for a vector-valued function’, Optimization 31 (1994), 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Craven, B.D., Luu, D.V. and Glover, B.M., ‘Strengthned invex and perturbations’, Math. Methods Oper. Res. 43 (1996), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Hanson, M.A., ‘On sufficiency of the Kuhn-Tucker conditions’, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 80 (1981), 545–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Ioffe, A.D. and Tikhomirov, V.M., Theory of extremal problems, (Russian) Nonlinear Analysis and its Applications (Izdat. Nauka, Moscow, 1974).Google Scholar
[10]Jeyakumar, V., ‘Strong and weak invexity in mathemtical programming’, methods Oper. Res. 55 (1985), 109–125.Google Scholar
[11]Luu, D.V. and Kien, P.T. ‘Sufficient optimality conditions under invexity hypotheses’, Vietnam J. Math. 28 (2000), 227–236.Google Scholar
[12]Luu, D.V. and Ha, N.X., ‘An invariant property of invex function and applications’, Acta Math. Vietnam, 25 (2000), 181–193.Google Scholar
[13]Luu, D.V. and Oettli, W., ‘Higher-order optimality condition for a minimax’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 54 (1996), 509–516.Google Scholar
[14]Reiland, T.W., ‘Generalized invexity for nonsmooth vector-valued mapping’, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 10 (1989), 1191–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Reiland, T.W., ‘Nonsmooth invexity’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 42 (1990), 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar