Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

“And we would have the field”: U.S. Steel and American trade policy, 1908–1912

Abstract
Abstract

Recent surveys revealed few producers in an export sector participate in trade. Economists explained this result by relaxing their assumption about firms’ operations, to produce a novel observation: Trade liberalization disproportionately benefits the most efficient producers in the sector, while potentially harming the least efficient. Political scientists have begun exploring the consequences of this variation, especially in lobbying. This article explores whether the impact of this finer-grained description of interests can be observed in the later stages of our demand-driven models of the politics of trade. I focus on one case with characteristics favorable to observing intra-industry differences: the American steel industry in Taft's presidency. A trade-based cleavage inside the sector determined firms’ interests. Demands shaped policy, as observed in three pieces of legislation: the Payne-Aldrich Act, reciprocity with Canada, and the 1912 tariff. The first liberalized trade in steel, intensifying competition in the industry. The second promised to do the same, with a similar impact. The third had no effect, however, because Taft vetoed the bill. This case illustrates intra-industry firm heterogeneity can provide additional accuracy, revealing a previously undiscovered cleavage. Nonetheless, preferences alone did not determine policy.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Mark R. Brawley, Department of Political Science, McGill University, e-amail: mark.brawley@mcgill.ca.
Footnotes
Hide All

I would like to thank Leo Baccini, Lauren Konken, Krzysztof Pelc, and two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
AklinMichael, Arias Eric, Deniz Emine, and Rosendorff B. Peter. 2015. “Domestic Politics of Trade Policy.” https://wp.nyu.edu/faculty-rosendorff/wp-content/uploads/sites/1510/2015/03/Wiley.pdf (accessed on March 25, 2017).
AltJames and Gilligan Michael. 1994. “The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective Action Problems, and Domestic Political Institutions,” Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (2): 165192.
BacciniLeonardo, Pinto Pablo, and Weymouth Stephen. 2017. “The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-Level Evidence,” International Organization.
BerglundAbraham. 1907. “The United States Steel Corporation: A Study of the Growth and Influence of Combination in the Iron and Steel Industry.” Studies in History, Economics & Public Law XXVII, #2. New York: Columbia University Press.
BernardA.B. and Jensen J.B.. 1999. “Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?Journal of International Economics 47: 125.
BernardA.B., Eaton J., Jensen J.B., and Kortum S.. 2003. “Plants and Productivity in International Trade.” American Economic Review 93 (4): 12681290.
BernardA.B., Jensen J.B., Redding S.J., and Schott P. K.. 2011. “The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade.” NBER Working Paper 17627. http://www.princeton.edu/~reddings/papers/NBERWP17627.pdf (accessed on March 25, 2017).
BombardiniMatilde. 2008. “Firm Heterogeneity and Lobby Participation.” Journal of International Economics 75 (2): 329–48.
BurtonDavid H., ed. 2001. The Collected Works of William Howard Taft, Vol. II Political Issues and Outlooks, Speeches Delivered Between August 1908 and February 1909. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
BurtonDavid H., ed. 2002. The Collected Works of William Howard Taft, Vol. IV Presidential Messages to Congress. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
CampbellBallard. 2005. “Economic Causes of Progressivism.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 4 (1): 722.
CleridesS.K., Lach S., and Tybout J.R.. 1998. “Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3): 903947.
ColettaPaolo E. 1973. The Presidency of William Howard Taft. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
GermanJames C.Jr. 1972. “Taft, Roosevelt, and United States Steel.” The Historian 34 (4): 598613.
GoodwinDoris Kearns. 2013. The Bully Pulpit. New York: Simon & Schuster.
GouldLewis L. 2009. The William Howard Taft Presidency. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
GouldLewis L., ed. 2011. My Dearest Nellie, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
HansbroughHenry Clay. 1913. The Wreck, An Historical and a Critical Study of the Administrations of Theodore Roosevelt and of William Howard Taft. New York: Neale Publishing.
HiscoxMichael. 2002. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
HessenRobert. 1975. Steel Titan: The Life of Charles M. Schwab. New York: Oxford University Press.
HoltJames. 1967. Congressional Insurgents and the Party System, 1909–1916. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
KimIn Song. 2017. “Political Cleavages within Industries: Firm-Level Lobbying for Trade Liberalization,” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 120.
KolarskyWilliam. 2011. “Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft: Marching Toward Armageddon.” Antitrust 25 (2): 97105.
KolkoGabriel. 1963. The Triumph of Conservatism. Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books.
LakeDavid. 1988. Power, Protection, and Free Trade. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
LurieJonathan. 2012. William Howard Taft: The Travails of a Progressive Conservative. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MadeiraMary Anne. 2016. “New trade, new politics: intra-industry trade and domestic political coalitions.” Review of International Political Economy 23 (4): 677711.
MannersWilliam. 1969. TR and Will: A Friendship that Split the Republican Party. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
MelitzMarc. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71: 16951725.
MelitzMarc. 2008. “International Trade and Heterogeneous Firms.” scholar.harvard.edu/files/melitz/files/palgrave.pdf (accessed on July 10, 2013).
MowryGeorge E. 1950. “Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Movement.” In Roosevelt, Wilson and the Trusts, edited by Rozwenc Edwin. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath & Co.
MowryGeorge E. 1960. Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Movement. New York: Hill & Wang.
OsgoodIain, Tingley Dustin, Bernauer Thomas, Kim In Song, Milner Helen, and Spilker Gabriele. 2017. “The Charmed Life of Superstar Exporters: Survey Evidence on Firms and Trade Policy,” Journal of Politics 79 (1): 133152.
OsgoodIain. 2016. “Differentiated Products, Divided Industries: Firm Preferences over Trade Liberalization.” Economics and Politics 28 (2): 161–80.
OsgoodIain. 2017. “The Breakdown of Industrial Opposition to Trade: Firms, Product Variety and Reciprocal Liberalization.” World Politics 69 (1): 148.
O'ToolePatricia. 2005. When Trumpets Call, Theodore Roosevelt After the White House. New York: Simon & Schuster.
PageWilliam. 2009. “The Gary Dinners and the Meaning of Concerted Action.” SMU Law Review 62: 597619.
PlouffeMichael. 2011. “The New Political Economy of Trade: Heterogenous Firms and Trade Preferences.” Paper presented at the 2011 meeting of the IPES.
RostowEugene V. 1949. “Monopoly Under the Sherman Act: Power or Purpose?Illinois Law Review 43 (6): 745793.
SolvickStanley. 1963. “William Howard Taft and the Payne-Aldrich Tariff.” The Mississippi Valley Historical Review 50 (3): 424442.
TaftWilliam H. 1912. “The Administration's Theory of a Constructive Policy Concerning Combinations.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 42: 273276.
TarbellIda. 1915. The Tariff in Our Times [reprint of 1911 edition]. New York: Macmillan.
TarbellIda. 1925. The Life of Elbert H. Gary: A Story of Steel. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
UrofskyMelvin. 1969. Big Steel and the Wilson Administration: A Study in Business-Government Relations. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
WalkerAlbert H. 1912. “President Taft and the Sherman Law: A Historical Sketch.” In Historical Sketches of the Administration of President Taft. New York: unknown.
WarrenKenneth. 1973. The American Steel Industry, 1850–1970: a geographical Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
WickershamGeorge W. 1914. “Recent Interpretation of the Sherman Act.” [Reprint of speech made 11 July 1911.] In The Changing Order. New York: Knickerbocker Press.
WickershamGeorge W. 1917. “The Sherman Anti-Trust Law.” In Some Legal Phases of Corporate Financing, Reorganization and Regulation. New York: Macmillan.
WillsHarry Tarleton. 1913. Scientific Tariff Making. New York: Blanchard Press.
WrightNelson Jones. 1941. “Canadian Reciprocity under the Administration of William Howard Taft.” M.S. Thesis, Kansas State College of Agriculture and Applied Science.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #16, Wednesday November 25, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #17, Wednesday November 25, 1908 (Evening Session). Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #18, Friday, November 27, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #27, Saturday, December 5, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #41, Tuesday, December 22, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #44, Monday, December 28, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #46, Tuesday, January 5, 1909. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1909.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, 1908–1909, Vol. II. Schedule B (continued) Schedule C. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1909.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, 1908–1909, Vol. VII. Schedule N (cont'd) Sundries, Freelist & Miscellaneous. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1909.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, 1908–1909, Vol. VIII. Appendix. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1909.
United States Steel Corporation, Hearings before the Committee on Investigation of United States Steel Corporation, House of Representatives, #3, Friday June 2, 1911. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1911.
United States Steel Corporation, Hearings before the Committee on Investigation of United States Steel Corporation, House of Representatives, #3, Wednesday February 28, 1912. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1912.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business and Politics
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1469-3569
  • URL: /core/journals/business-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 17 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 139 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th April 2017 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.