Skip to main content
×
×
Home

“And we would have the field”: U.S. Steel and American trade policy, 1908–1912

Abstract
Abstract

Recent surveys revealed few producers in an export sector participate in trade. Economists explained this result by relaxing their assumption about firms’ operations, to produce a novel observation: Trade liberalization disproportionately benefits the most efficient producers in the sector, while potentially harming the least efficient. Political scientists have begun exploring the consequences of this variation, especially in lobbying. This article explores whether the impact of this finer-grained description of interests can be observed in the later stages of our demand-driven models of the politics of trade. I focus on one case with characteristics favorable to observing intra-industry differences: the American steel industry in Taft's presidency. A trade-based cleavage inside the sector determined firms’ interests. Demands shaped policy, as observed in three pieces of legislation: the Payne-Aldrich Act, reciprocity with Canada, and the 1912 tariff. The first liberalized trade in steel, intensifying competition in the industry. The second promised to do the same, with a similar impact. The third had no effect, however, because Taft vetoed the bill. This case illustrates intra-industry firm heterogeneity can provide additional accuracy, revealing a previously undiscovered cleavage. Nonetheless, preferences alone did not determine policy.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Mark R. Brawley, Department of Political Science, McGill University, e-amail: mark.brawley@mcgill.ca.
Footnotes
Hide All

I would like to thank Leo Baccini, Lauren Konken, Krzysztof Pelc, and two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aklin Michael, Arias Eric, Deniz Emine, and Rosendorff B. Peter. 2015. “Domestic Politics of Trade Policy.” https://wp.nyu.edu/faculty-rosendorff/wp-content/uploads/sites/1510/2015/03/Wiley.pdf (accessed on March 25, 2017).
Alt James and Gilligan Michael. 1994. “The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective Action Problems, and Domestic Political Institutions,” Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (2): 165192.
Baccini Leonardo, Pinto Pablo, and Weymouth Stephen. 2017. “The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-Level Evidence,” International Organization.
Berglund Abraham. 1907. “The United States Steel Corporation: A Study of the Growth and Influence of Combination in the Iron and Steel Industry.” Studies in History, Economics & Public Law XXVII, #2. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bernard A.B. and Jensen J.B.. 1999. “Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?Journal of International Economics 47: 125.
Bernard A.B., Eaton J., Jensen J.B., and Kortum S.. 2003. “Plants and Productivity in International Trade.” American Economic Review 93 (4): 12681290.
Bernard A.B., Jensen J.B., Redding S.J., and Schott P. K.. 2011. “The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade.” NBER Working Paper 17627. http://www.princeton.edu/~reddings/papers/NBERWP17627.pdf (accessed on March 25, 2017).
Bombardini Matilde. 2008. “Firm Heterogeneity and Lobby Participation.” Journal of International Economics 75 (2): 329–48.
Burton David H., ed. 2001. The Collected Works of William Howard Taft, Vol. II Political Issues and Outlooks, Speeches Delivered Between August 1908 and February 1909. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Burton David H., ed. 2002. The Collected Works of William Howard Taft, Vol. IV Presidential Messages to Congress. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Campbell Ballard. 2005. “Economic Causes of Progressivism.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 4 (1): 722.
Clerides S.K., Lach S., and Tybout J.R.. 1998. “Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3): 903947.
Coletta Paolo E. 1973. The Presidency of William Howard Taft. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
German James C. Jr. 1972. “Taft, Roosevelt, and United States Steel.” The Historian 34 (4): 598613.
Goodwin Doris Kearns. 2013. The Bully Pulpit. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Gould Lewis L. 2009. The William Howard Taft Presidency. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Gould Lewis L., ed. 2011. My Dearest Nellie, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Hansbrough Henry Clay. 1913. The Wreck, An Historical and a Critical Study of the Administrations of Theodore Roosevelt and of William Howard Taft. New York: Neale Publishing.
Hiscox Michael. 2002. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hessen Robert. 1975. Steel Titan: The Life of Charles M. Schwab. New York: Oxford University Press.
Holt James. 1967. Congressional Insurgents and the Party System, 1909–1916. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kim In Song. 2017. “Political Cleavages within Industries: Firm-Level Lobbying for Trade Liberalization,” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 120.
Kolarsky William. 2011. “Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft: Marching Toward Armageddon.” Antitrust 25 (2): 97105.
Kolko Gabriel. 1963. The Triumph of Conservatism. Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books.
Lake David. 1988. Power, Protection, and Free Trade. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lurie Jonathan. 2012. William Howard Taft: The Travails of a Progressive Conservative. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Madeira Mary Anne. 2016. “New trade, new politics: intra-industry trade and domestic political coalitions.” Review of International Political Economy 23 (4): 677711.
Manners William. 1969. TR and Will: A Friendship that Split the Republican Party. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Melitz Marc. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71: 16951725.
Melitz Marc. 2008. “International Trade and Heterogeneous Firms.” scholar.harvard.edu/files/melitz/files/palgrave.pdf (accessed on July 10, 2013).
Mowry George E. 1950. “Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Movement.” In Roosevelt, Wilson and the Trusts, edited by Rozwenc Edwin. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath & Co.
Mowry George E. 1960. Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Movement. New York: Hill & Wang.
Osgood Iain, Tingley Dustin, Bernauer Thomas, Kim In Song, Milner Helen, and Spilker Gabriele. 2017. “The Charmed Life of Superstar Exporters: Survey Evidence on Firms and Trade Policy,” Journal of Politics 79 (1): 133152.
Osgood Iain. 2016. “Differentiated Products, Divided Industries: Firm Preferences over Trade Liberalization.” Economics and Politics 28 (2): 161–80.
Osgood Iain. 2017. “The Breakdown of Industrial Opposition to Trade: Firms, Product Variety and Reciprocal Liberalization.” World Politics 69 (1): 148.
O'Toole Patricia. 2005. When Trumpets Call, Theodore Roosevelt After the White House. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Page William. 2009. “The Gary Dinners and the Meaning of Concerted Action.” SMU Law Review 62: 597619.
Plouffe Michael. 2011. “The New Political Economy of Trade: Heterogenous Firms and Trade Preferences.” Paper presented at the 2011 meeting of the IPES.
Rostow Eugene V. 1949. “Monopoly Under the Sherman Act: Power or Purpose?Illinois Law Review 43 (6): 745793.
Solvick Stanley. 1963. “William Howard Taft and the Payne-Aldrich Tariff.” The Mississippi Valley Historical Review 50 (3): 424442.
Taft William H. 1912. “The Administration's Theory of a Constructive Policy Concerning Combinations.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 42: 273276.
Tarbell Ida. 1915. The Tariff in Our Times [reprint of 1911 edition]. New York: Macmillan.
Tarbell Ida. 1925. The Life of Elbert H. Gary: A Story of Steel. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
Urofsky Melvin. 1969. Big Steel and the Wilson Administration: A Study in Business-Government Relations. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Walker Albert H. 1912. “President Taft and the Sherman Law: A Historical Sketch.” In Historical Sketches of the Administration of President Taft. New York: unknown.
Warren Kenneth. 1973. The American Steel Industry, 1850–1970: a geographical Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wickersham George W. 1914. “Recent Interpretation of the Sherman Act.” [Reprint of speech made 11 July 1911.] In The Changing Order. New York: Knickerbocker Press.
Wickersham George W. 1917. “The Sherman Anti-Trust Law.” In Some Legal Phases of Corporate Financing, Reorganization and Regulation. New York: Macmillan.
Wills Harry Tarleton. 1913. Scientific Tariff Making. New York: Blanchard Press.
Wright Nelson Jones. 1941. “Canadian Reciprocity under the Administration of William Howard Taft.” M.S. Thesis, Kansas State College of Agriculture and Applied Science.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #16, Wednesday November 25, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #17, Wednesday November 25, 1908 (Evening Session). Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #18, Friday, November 27, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #27, Saturday, December 5, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #41, Tuesday, December 22, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #44, Monday, December 28, 1908. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1908.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, First Print #46, Tuesday, January 5, 1909. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1909.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, 1908–1909, Vol. II. Schedule B (continued) Schedule C. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1909.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, 1908–1909, Vol. VII. Schedule N (cont'd) Sundries, Freelist & Miscellaneous. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1909.
Tariff Hearings before the Committee on Ways & Means of the House of Representatives, Sixtieth Congress, 1908–1909, Vol. VIII. Appendix. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1909.
United States Steel Corporation, Hearings before the Committee on Investigation of United States Steel Corporation, House of Representatives, #3, Friday June 2, 1911. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1911.
United States Steel Corporation, Hearings before the Committee on Investigation of United States Steel Corporation, House of Representatives, #3, Wednesday February 28, 1912. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1912.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business and Politics
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1469-3569
  • URL: /core/journals/business-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 30 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 182 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th April 2017 - 23rd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.