Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Global interdependence in clean energy transitions

  • Jonas Meckling and Llewelyn Hughes
Abstract

The global energy industry is transforming as governments invest in clean energy technologies to address climate change, enhance energy security, and strengthen national competitiveness. Comparative research on clean energy transitions highlights the domestic drivers and constraints of clean energy transitions. This article contends that we need to understand the effects of global interdependence on clean energy transitions. Shifts in forms of interdependence between firms—influenced by the rise of global supply chains—have new implications for policy choices made by governments. Governments face more complex demands from domestic industries facing global economic competition, and act strategically in response to the actions of other governments, including sub-national actors, and firms in the global economy. We suggest that research on interdependence in clean energy transitions benefits from an analytical focus on mechanisms of transnational change such as cross-national and multi-level policy feedback and cross-national policy sequencing. Global interdependence has important implications for economic and environmental outcomes, affecting the durability of competitive advantage, and influencing the pace of the diffusion of clean energy technologies.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Global interdependence in clean energy transitions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Global interdependence in clean energy transitions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Global interdependence in clean energy transitions
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Jonas Meckling,Assistant Professor of Energy and Environmental Policy, Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall, #3114, Berkeley, CA 94720; Email: meckling@berkeley.edu
Llewelyn Hughes, Associate Professor of Public Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Lennox Crossing, Canberra 2601, Australia; Email: llewelyn.hughes@anu.edu.au
Footnotes
Hide All

The authors contributed equally to the manuscript. We thank Henry Farrell, Kathy Hochstetler, Abe Newman, Valerie Karplus, Tobias Schmidt, Sam Trachtman, the anonymous reviewers, and the editors for helpful comments. We are grateful for research assistance by Nicholas Goedeking.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aggarwal, V. K., and Evenett, S. J.. 2012. “Industrial policy choice during the crisis era.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 28 (2): 261–83.
Aklin, M., and Urpelainen, J.. 2013. “Political competition, path dependence, and the strategy of sustainable energy transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 643–58.
Aklin, M. 2018. “How robust is the renewable energy industry to political shocks? Evidence from the 2016 U.S. elections?Business and Politics 20 (4): 523–52.
Aklin, M., and Urpelainen, J.. 2018. Renewables: The Politics of a Global Energy Transition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Andonova, L. B., et al. 2009. “Transnational Climate Governance.” Global Environmental Politics 9 (2): 5273.
Andonova, L. B., et al. 2017. “National Policy and Transnational Governance of Climate Change: Substitutes or Complements?International Studies Quarterly 61 (2): 253–68.
Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., and Bulkeley, H.. 2009. “Transnational climate governance.” Global environmental politics 9 (2): 5273.
Bach, D., and Newman, A. L.. 2010. “Governing lipitor and lipstick: Capacity, sequencing, and power in international pharmaceutical and cosmetics regulation.” Review of international Political Economy 17 (4): 665–95.
Bäckstrand, K. 2008. “Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships.Global environmental politics 8 (3): 74102.
Baldwin, R. 2016. The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Battke, B., and Schmidt, T. S.. 2015. “Cost-efficient demand-pull policies for multi-purpose technologies—The case of stationary electricity storage.” Applied Energy 155: 334–48.
Beise, M., and Rennings, K.. 2005. “Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations.” Ecological Economics 52 (1): 517.
Biber, E. 2013. “Cultivating a Green Political Landscape.” Vanderbilt Law Review 66 (2): 399462.
Binz, C., and Truffer, B.. 2017. “Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts.” Research Policy 46 (7): 1284–98.
Binz, C., et al. 2017. “Spatial lifecycles of cleantech industries—The global development history of solar photovoltaics.” Energy Policy 101: 386402.
Binz, C., and Anadon, L. D.. 2018. “Unrelated diversification in latecomer contexts: Emergence of the Chinese solar photovoltaics industry.” Energy Policy 28: 13–34.
Bodansky, D. 2016. “The Paris climate change agreement: a new hope?American Journal of International Law 110 (2): 288319.
Bose Styczynski, A., and Hughes, L.. 2018. “A cross-national comparison of electric vehicle and fuel cell vehicle industry policies.Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.09.002
Breetz, H., Mildenberger, M., and Stokes, L.. 2018. “The political logics of clean energy transitions.” Business and Politics 20 (4): 492522.
Breschi, S., and Malerba, F.. 2001. “The geography of innovation and economic clustering: some introductory notes.” Industrial and corporate change 10 (4): 817–33.
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Bäckstrand, K., Betsill, M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M., Newell, P., Paterson, M., Roger, C., and VanDeveer, S.. 2014. Transnational Climate Governance. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Busch, P.-O., and Jörgens, H.. 2005. “The International Sources of Policy Convergence. Explaining the Spread of Environmental Policy Innovations.” Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 860–84.
Chaudoin, S., et al. 2014. “International Systems and Domestic Politics: Linking Complex Interactions with Empirical Models in International Relations.” International Organization 69 (2): 275309.
Crasnic, L., et al. 2017. “Networked liabilities: Transnational authority in a world of transnational business.” European Journal of International Relations 23 (4): 906–29.
Curran, L. 2015. “The impact of trade policy on global production networks: The solar panel case.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (5): 1025–054.
Downie, C. 2018. “Ad hoc coalitions in the United States energy sector: case studies in the gas, oil, and coal industries.” Business and Politics 20 (4): 643–68.
Elkins, Z., and Simmons, B.. 2004. “On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework.” The Annals of the American Academy 598 (1): 3351.
Fankhauser, S., et al. 2013. “Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation.” Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 902–13.
Farrell, H., and Newman, A. L.. 2010. “Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy.” Review of international Political Economy 17 (4): 609–38.
Farrell, H., and Newman, A. L.. 2014. “Domestic Institutions beyond the Nation-State: Charting the New Interdependence Approach.” World Politics 66 (2): 331–63.
Farrell, H. and Newman, A.. 2015. “The New Politics of Interdependence: Cross-National Layering in Trans-Atlantic Regulatory Disputes.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (4): 497526.
Gallagher, K. S. 2014. The globalization of clean energy technology: Lessons from China. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gawande, K., et al. 2014. “Global Supply Chains and Trade Policy Responses to the 2008 Crisis.” The World Bank Economic Review 29 (1): 102–28.
Geels, F. W. 2017. “Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization.” Science 357 (6357): 1242–44.
Gereffi, G., et al. 2005. “The governance of global value chains.” Review of international Political Economy 12 (1): 78104.
Hale, T., and Urpelainen, J.. 2014. “When and how can unilateral policies promote the international diffusion of environmental policies and clean technology?Journal of Theoretical Politics 27 (2): 177205.
Hansen, T., and Coenen, L. 2015. “The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field.” Environmental innovation and societal transitions 17: 92109.
Harrison, A., Martin, L. A., and Nataraj, S.. 2017. “Green Industrial Policy in Emerging Markets.” Annual Review of Resource Economics 9: 256–74.
Hochstetler, K., and Kostka, G.. 2015. “Wind and Solar Power in Brazil and China: Interests, State-Business Relations, and Policy Outcomes.” Global Environmental Politics 15 (3): 7494.
Hoppmann, J., et al. 2014. “Compulsive policy-making—The evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power.” Research Policy 43 (8): 1422–41.
Howlett, M. 2009. “Process sequencing policy dynamics: Beyond homeostasis and path dependency.” Journal of Public Policy 29 (3): 241–62.
Hughes, L., and Meckling, J.. 2017. “The politics of renewable energy trade: The US-China solar dispute.” Energy Policy 105: 256–62.
Hughes, L., and Meckling, J.. 2018. “Policy competition in clean technology: Scaling up or innovating up?Business and Politics 20 (4): 588614.
Hughes, L., and Urpelainen, J.. 2015. “Interests, institutions, and climate policy: Explaining the choice of policy instruments for the energy sector.Environmental Science & Policy 54: 5263.
Humphrey, J., and Schmitz, H.. 2002. “How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?Regional Studies 36 (9): 10171027.
Hummels, D., Ishii, J. and Yi, K.M. 2001. “The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade.Journal of international Economics (54) (1): 7596.
International Energy Agency. 2018. World Energy Investment Report. Paris: IEA.
Jaffe, A. M. 2018. “Green Giant: Renewable Energy and Chinese Power.Foreign Affairs (March/April): 8393.
Jänicke, M., and Jacob, K.. 2004. “Lead Markets for Environmental Innovations: A New Role for the Nation State.” Global Environmental Politics 4 (1): 2946.
Jordan, A., and Matt, E.. 2014. “Designing policies that intentionally stick: policy feedback in a changing climate.” Policy Sciences 47 (3): 227–47.
Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., Van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. J., Schoenefeld, J. J., Tosun, J., Forster, J., and Boasson, E. L.. 2015. “Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects.Nature Climate Change 5 (11): 977.
Kelsey, N. 2014. The Green Spiral: Policy-Industry Feedback and the Success of International Environmental Negotiation. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
Kelsey, N. 2018. “Industry Type and Environmental Policy: Industry Characteristics Shape the Potential for Success in International and National Climate Policy.” Business and Politics 20 (4): 615–42.
Keohane, R., and Nye, J.. 1977. “Power and Interdependence Boston, Little, Brown.
Kern, F., and Rogge, K. S.. 2016. “The pace of governed energy transitions: Agency, international dynamics and the global Paris agreement accelerating decarbonisation processes?Energy Research & Social Science 22: 1317.
Kim, S. E., and Urpelainen, J.. 2013. “Technology Competition and International Co-operation: Friends or Foes?British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 545–74.
Kolk, A. and Curran, L.. 2017. “Contesting a place in the sun: on ideologies in foreign markets and liabilities of origin.” Journal of Business Ethics 142 (4): 697717.
Kolk, A., and Curran, L.. 2015. “Contesting a Place in the Sun: On Ideologies in Foreign Markets and Liabilities of Origin.” Journal of Business Ethics 142 (4): 697717.
Lake, D. A. 2009. “Open economy politics: A critical review.” The Review of International Organizations 4 (3): 219–44.
Lam, L.T., Branstetter, L. and Azevedo, I.M 2017. “China's wind industry: Leading in deployment, lagging in innovation.” Energy Policy 106: 588599.
Levin, K., et al. 2012. “Overcoming the tragedy of super-wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change.” Policy Sciences 45: 123–52.
Lewis, J. I. 2013. Green innovation in China: China's wind power industry and the global transition to a low-carbon economy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lewis, J. I. 2014. “The Rise of Renewable Energy Protectionism: Emerging Trade Conflicts and Implications for Low-carbon Development.” Global Environmental Politics 14 (4): 1035.
Lockwood, M. 2013. “The political sustainability of climate policy: The case of the UK Climate Change Act.” Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 1339–48.
Lockwood, M., et al. 2016. “Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 35 (2): 122.
Mahoney, J. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–48.
Meckling, J. 2018. “The developmental state in global regulation: Economic change and climate policy.” European Journal of International Relations 28 (1): 5881.
Meckling, J., and Nahm, J.. 2018. “When do states disrupt industries? Electric cars in Germany and the United States.” Review of international Political Economy 25 (4): 505–29.
Meckling, J., and Nahm, J.. Forthcoming. “Banning dirty cars: Political signaling and green technology competition.Energy Policy.
Meckling, J., and Hughes, L.. 2017. “Globalizing Solar: Global Supply Chains and Trade Preferences.” International Studies Quarterly 61: 225235.
Meckling, J., and Hughes, L.. 2018. “Protecting Solar: Global Supply Chains and Business Power.” New Political Economy 23 (1): 88104.
Meckling, J., et al. 2015. “Winning Coalitions for Climate Policy: Green Industrial Policy Builds Support for Carbon Regulation.” Science 249 (6253): 1170–71.
Meckling, J., et al. 2017. “Policy sequencing toward decarbonization.” Nature Energy 2: 918922.
Moe, E. 2015. Renewable Energy Transformation or Fossil Fuel Backlash: Vested Interests in the Political Economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nahm, J. 2017. “Renewable futures and industrial legacies: Wind and solar sectors in China, Germany, and the United States.” Business and Politics 19 (1): 68106.
Nahm, J., and Steinfeld, E. S.. 2014. “Scale-up Nation: China's Specialization in Innovative Manufacturing.” World Development 54: 288300.
Nemet, G. F. 2009. “Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change.” Research Policy 38 (5): 700709.
Neumayer, E., and Plümper, T.. 2012. “Conditional spatial policy dependence: theory and model specification.” Comparative Political Studies 45.7 (2012): 819–49.
Oatley, T. 2011. “The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy.” International Organization 65 (2): 311–41.
OECD, WTO, and World Bank. 2014. “Global Value Chains: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Policy.” Report preparted for submission to the G20 Trade Ministers Meeting, Sydney Australia, 19 July 2014. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/tad/gvc_report_g20_july_2014.pdf (accessed 25 October, 2018)
Page, S. E. 2006. “Path Dependence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (1): 87115.
Pegels, A., and Lütkenhorst, W.. 2014. “Is Germany's energy transition a case of successful green industrial policy? Contrasting wind and solar PV.” Energy Policy 74: 522534.
Peters, M., Schneider, M., Griesshaber, T., and Hoffmann, V. H.. 2012. “The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change–Does the locus of policies matter?Research Policy 41 (8): 1296–308.
Potoski, M., and Prakash, A.. 2005. “Green Clubs and Voluntary Governance: ISO 14001 and Firms’ Regulatory Compliance.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 235–48.
Quitzow, R. 2015. “Dynamics of a policy-driven market: The co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 126–48.
Quitzow, R., Walz, R., Köhler, J., and Rennings, K.. 2014. “The concept of “lead markets” revisited: Contribution to environmental innovation theory.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 10: 419.
Quitzow, R., Huenteler, J., and Asmussen, H.. 2017. “Development trajectories in China's wind and solar energy industries: How technology-related differences shape the dynamics of industry localization and catching up.” Journal of Cleaner Production 158: 122–33.
REN21. 2017. Renewable 2017: Global Status Report. Paris: Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century.
Richter, M. 2013. “Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy.” Energy Policy 62: 1226–37.
Rodrik, D. 2014. “Green industrial policy.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30 (3): 469–91.
Sabel, C. F., and Victor, D. G.. 2015. “Governing global problems under uncertainty: making bottom-up climate policy work.” Climatic Change 144 (1): 1527.
Scherer, F. M. 1992. International High-Technology Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schmidt, T. S., and Huenteler, J.. 2016. “Anticipating industry localization effects of clean technology deployment policies in developing countries.” Global Environmental Change 38: 820.
Schmidt, T. S., Battke, B., Grosspietsch, D., and Hoffmann, V. H.. 2016. “Do deployment policies pick technologies by (not) picking applications?—A simulation of investment decisions in technologies with multiple applications.Research Policy 45 (10): 1965–83.
Schmidt, T. S., Matsuo, T., and Michaelowa, A.. 2017. “Renewable energy policy as an enabler of fossil fuel subsidy reform? Applying a socio-technical perspective to the cases of South Africa and Tunisia.Global Environmental Change, 45: 99110.
Schmidt, T. S., and Sewerin, S.. 2017. “Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics.” Nature Energy 2: 17084.
Sivaram, V. 2018. Taming the Sun: Innovation to Harness Solar Energy and Power the Planet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Steffen, B., Matsuo, T., Steinemann, D., and Schmidt, T.. 2018. “Opening new markets for clean energy: The role of project developers in the global diffusion of renewable energy technologies.” Business and Politics 20 (4): 553–87.
Stokes, L. C. 2015. Power Politics: Renewable Energy Policy Change in US States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sturgeon, T. J., Nielsen, P. B., Linden, G., Gereffi, G., and Brown, C.. 2013. “Direct Measurement of Global Value Chains: Collecting Product- and Firm-Level Statistics on Value Added and Business Function Outsourcing and Offshoring.” In Trade in Value Added: Developing New Measures of Cross-Border Trade, edited by Mattoo, A., Wang, Z., and Wei, S.-J.. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 289319.
Tyson, L. D. A. 1992. “Who's Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries.” Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Unruh, G. C. 2000. “Understanding Carbon Lock-in.” Energy Policy 28: 817–30.
Victor, D. G., et al. 2005. “A Madisonian Approach to Climate Policy.” Science 16 (5742): 1820–21.
Vogel, D. 1995. Trading Up. Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wu, M., and Salzman, J.. 2014. “The Next Generation of Trade and Environment Disputes: The Rise of Green Industrial Policy.” Northwestern University Law Review 108 (2): 401–74.
Zhang, F., and Gallagher, K. S. 2016. “Innovation and technology transfer through global value chains: Evidence from China's PV industry.” Energy Policy 94: 191203.
Zysman, J., and Huberty, M.. 2014. Can Green Sustain Growth? Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business and Politics
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1469-3569
  • URL: /core/journals/business-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed