Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T20:11:57.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Whistle-Blowing Process?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Janet P. Near ,
Michael T. Rehg ,
James R. Van Scotter  and
Marcia P. Miceli
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We analyzed data from a survey of employees of a large military base in order to assess possible differences in the whistle-blowing process due to type of wrongdoing observed. Employees who observed perceived wrongdoing involving mismanagement, sexual harassment, or unspecified legal violations were significantly more likely to report it than were employees who observed stealing, waste, safety problems, or discrimination. Further, type of wrongdoing was significantly related to reasons given by employees who observed wrongdoing but did not report it, across all forms of wrongdoing. However, the primary reason that observers did not report it was that they thought nothing could be done to rectify the situation. Finally, type of wrongdoing was significantly related to the cost of the wrongdoing, the quality of the evidence about the wrongdoing, and the comprehensiveness of retaliation against the whistle-blower. These findings suggest that type of wrongdoing makes a difference in the whistle-blowing process, and it should be examined in future research.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 219 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bash, D., and Friedlen, T.. 2002. FBI agent blows whistle on Moussaoui probe: ‘I had to do what I believed was right.’ CNN.com, 5/23/02.Google Scholar
Bok, S. 1980. Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Bowie, N. 1982. Business ethics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Burns, T., and Stalker, G. M.. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Callahan, E. S., and Dworkin, T. M.. 2000. The state of state whistleblower protection. American Business Law Journal 38: 99–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dandekar, N. 1990. Contrasting consequences: Bringing charges of sexual harassment compared with other cases of whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 9: 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De George, R. T. 1986. Business ethics. New York: Macmillan (second edition).Google Scholar
Devine, T. M., and Aplin, D. G.. 1986. Abuse of authority: The office of the special counsel and whistleblower protection. Antioch Law Journal 4(5): 5–71.Google Scholar
Dozier, J. B., and Miceli, M. P.. 1985. Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review 10: 823–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, T. M., and Baucus, M. S.. 1995. Internal versus external whistleblowers: A comparison of the whistleblowing process. Paper presented at the meetings of the Academy of Management, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Dworkin, T. M., and Near, J. P.. 1987. Whistle-blowing statutes: Are they working? American Business Law Journal 25: 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, T. M., and Near, J. P.. 1997. A better statutory approach to whistle-blowing. Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, D., and Petersen, J. C.. 1982. Patterns of political behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review 7: 403–412.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. P. 2002. Whistleblowing: A study of managerial differences. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 14: 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, J. P., and McLain, D. L.. 1992. Whistleblowing: A conceptualization and model. Paper presented to the meetings of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
King, G., III. 1997. The effects of interpersonal closeness and issue seriousness on blowing the whistle. Journal of Business Communication 34: 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacayo, R., and Ripley, A.. Persons of the year 2002: Cynthia Cooper, Coleen Rowley and Sherron Watkins. Time magazine, 12/22/02; http://www.time.com/time/personoftheyear/2002.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Gibson, S., and Near, J. P.. 2002. Sexual harassment reporting as whistle-blowing: Test of a model of predictors and outcomes. Paper presented to the meetings of the Academy of Management, Denver.Google Scholar
Miceli, M. P., Dozier, J. B., and Near, J. P.. 1991. Blowing the whistle on data-fudging: A controlled field experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21: 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, M. P., and Near, J. P.. 1984. The relationships among beliefs, organizational position and whistle-blowing status: A discriminant analysis. Academy of Management Journal 27: 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, M. P., and Near, J. P.. 1985. Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions. Personnel Psychology 38: 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, M. P., and Near, J. P.. 1988. Individual and situational correlates of whistle-blowing, Personnel Psychology 41: 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, M. P., and Near, J. P.. 1992. Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
Miceli, M. P., and Near, J. P.. 1994. Relationships among value congruence, perceived victimization, and retaliation against whistle-blowers: The case of internal auditors. Journal of Management 20: 773–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, M. P., and Near, J. P.. 1997. Definition of “whistle-blowing.” In The Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of human resource management, ed. Peters, L. H., Greer, C. R. B., and Youngblood, S. A.: 388. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Miceli, M. P., and Near, J. P.. 2002. What makes whistle-blowers effective: Three field studies. Human Relations 55: 455–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., and Schwenk, C. P.. 1991. Who blows the whistle and why? Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45: 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, M. P., Rehg, M., Near, J. P., and Ryan, K.. 1999. Can laws protect whistle-blowers? Results of a naturally occurring field experiment. Work and Occupations 26: 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miethe, T. D. 1999. Whistle-blowing at work: Tough choices in exposing fraud, waste, and abuse on the job. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Miethe, T. D., and Rothschild, J.. 1994. Whistleblowing and the control of organizational misconduct. Sociological Inquiry 64: 322–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Whistle-Blower Center. 2002, http://www.whistleblowers.org.Google Scholar
Near, J. P., Baucus, M. S., and Miceli, M. P.. 1993. The relationship between values and practice: Organizational climates for wrongdoing. Administration and Society 25: 204–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Near, J. P., Dworkin, T. M., and Miceli, M. P.. 1993. Explaining the whistle-blowing process: Suggestions from power theory and justice theory, Organization Science 4: 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Near, J. P., and Jensen, T. C.. 1983. The whistle-blowing process: Retaliation and perceived effectiveness. Work and Occupations 10: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Near, J. P., and Miceli, M. P. 1985. Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics 4: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Near, J. P., and Miceli, M. P. 1986. Retaliation against whistle-blowers: Predictors and effects. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Near, J. P., and Miceli, M. P. 1987. Whistle-blowers in organizations: Dissidents or reformers? In Research in organizational behavior, ed. Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L. (Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press): 321–368.Google Scholar
Near, J. P., and Miceli, M. P. 1996. Whistle-blowing: Myth and reality, Journal of Management 22: 507–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmerlee, M. A., Near, J. P., and Jensen, T. C.. 1982. Correlates of whistle-blowers’ perceptions of organizational retaliation. Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. L. 1993. Whistleblowing, organizational performance, and organizational control. In Ethics and Public Administration, ed. Frederickson, H. G. (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe): 79–99.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., and Bennett, R. J.. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal 38: 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, J., and Miethe, T. D.. 1999. Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation: The battle to control information about organizational corruption. Work and Occupations 26: 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board. 1981. Whistle-blowing and the federal employee. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board. 1993. Whistle-blowing in the federal government: An update. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vinten, G. 1994. Whistleblowing—fact and fiction: An introductory discussion. In Whistleblowing: Subversion or corporate citizenship, ed. Vinten, G. (New York: St. Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
Westin, A. F. 1981. Whistle-blowing: Loyalty and dissent in the corporation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar