Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 43
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Joannides, Corinne Cortese, Vassili VanPeursem, Karen Old, Kevin and Locke, Stuart 2016. Socializing accounting practices in governing boards: dairy co-operatives down-under. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 75.


    O’Leary, Susan 2016. Grassroots accountability promises in rights-based approaches to development: The role of transformative monitoring and evaluation in NGOs. Accounting, Organizations and Society,


    Olsen, Kari Joseph and Stekelberg, James 2016. CEO Narcissism and Corporate Tax Sheltering. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Overall, Jeffrey 2016. Unethical behavior in organizations: empirical findings that challenge CSR and egoism theory. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 113.


    Rhodes, Carl and Westwood, Robert 2016. The Limits of Generosity: Lessons on Ethics, Economy, and Reciprocity in Kafka’s The Metamorphosis. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 133, Issue. 2, p. 235.


    Sebhatu, Samuel Petros and Pei-lin, Li 2016. What is Governance? The Ethical Dilemma for Leaders and Managers: Multiple Case Studies of Corruption from China. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 224, p. 467.


    Allwood, Jens Johansson, Inga-Lill Olsson, Lars-Eric and Tuna, Gülüzar 2015. On the Need for an Ethical Understanding of Health-Care Accountability. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 121.


    Du, Xingqiang 2015. Does Confucianism Reduce Minority Shareholder Expropriation? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 132, Issue. 4, p. 661.


    Faldetta, Guglielmo 2015. A relational approach to responsibility in organizations: The logic of gift and Lévinasian ethics for a ‘corporeal’ responsibility. Culture and Organization, p. 1.


    Puyou, François-Régis and Faÿ, Eric 2015. Cogs in the Wheel or Spanners in the Works? A Phenomenological Approach to the Difficulty and Meaning of Ethical Work for Financial Controllers. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 128, Issue. 4, p. 863.


    Werner, Andrea 2014. ‘Margin Call’: Using Film to Explore Behavioural Aspects of the Financial Crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 122, Issue. 4, p. 643.


    Painter-Morland, Mollie 2013. The Relationship between Identity Crises and Crises of Control. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 114, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Solomon, Jill F. Solomon, Aris Joseph, Nathan L. and Norton, Simon D. 2013. Impression management, myth creation and fabrication in private social and environmental reporting: Insights from Erving Goffman. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 195.


    Wray-Bliss, Edward 2013. A crisis of leadership: towards an anti-sovereign ethics of organisation. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 86.


    Dale, Karen 2012. The Employee as ‘Dish of the Day’: The Ethics of the Consuming/Consumed Self in Human Resource Management. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 111, Issue. 1, p. 13.


    de Gama, Nadia McKenna, Steve and Peticca-Harris, Amanda 2012. Ethics and HRM: Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 111, Issue. 1, p. 97.


    Engelbrecht, Schalk 2012. Radical business ethics: a critical and postmetaphysical manifesto. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 339.


    Garsten, Christina 2012. A Companion to the Anthropology of Europe.


    Wray-Bliss, Edward 2012. Leadership and the deified/demonic: a cultural examination of CEO sanctification. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 434.


    Baker, Max and Roberts, John 2011. All in the Mind? Ethical Identity and the Allure of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 101, Issue. S1, p. 5.


    ×

Corporate Governance and the Ethics of Narcissus

Abstract
Abstract:

This paper offers an extended critique of the proliferation of talk and writing of business ethics in recent years. Following Levinas, it is argued that the ground of ethics lies in our corporeal sensibility to proximate others. Such moral sensibility, however, is readily blunted by a narcissistic preoccupation with self and securing the perception of self in the eyes of powerful others. Drawing upon a Lacanian account of the formation of the subject, and a Foucaultian account of the workings of disciplinary power, it is then argued that the governance of the corporation is effected precisely through encouraging such a narcissistic preoccupation with the self. For the most part our narcissistic concerns are bound to ethically indifferent financial interests. But in recent years they have also been harnessed to the demand for environmental, social and ethical responsibility by the corporation. It is argued, however, that the desire to be seen to be ethical—the ethics of narcissus—is the obverse of “being responsible for.”

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Charkham and A. Simpson 1999. Fair Shares; the Future of Shareholder Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

F. Davis and S Stout . 1992. “Organization Theory and the Market for Corporate Control.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 3759.

F. Davis and T. Thompson 1994. “A Social Movement Perspective on Corporate Control.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 141168.

E. Fama 1980. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88: 288307.

C. Grey 1994. “Career as a Project of the Self and Labor Process Discipline.” Sociology 28: 479507.

K. Gergen and D. Whitney 1996. “Technologies of Representation in the Global Corporation: Power and Polyphony.” In Postmodern Management and Organization Theory, ed. D. Boje et al., pp. 331357. London: Sage.

M. Jensen and W. Meckling 1976. “Theory of the Firm; Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” The Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305360.

M. Kets de Vries 1991. “Whatever Happened to the Philosopher King? The Leader’s Addiction to Power.” Journal of Management Studies 28: 339351.

J. Law 1992. “Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network; Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity.” Systems Practice 5: 379393.

E. Lévinas 1991. Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

P Miller . and T. O’Leary 1987. “Accounting and the Construction of the Governable Person.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 12: 235266.

P Miller . and T. O’Leary 1993. “Accounting Expertise and the Politics of the Product; Economic Citizenship and Modes of Corporate Governance.” Accounting Organizations and Society 18: 187206.

M. Parker 1997. “Organizations and Citizenship.” Organization 4: 7592.

J. Roberts 1991. “The Possibilities of Accountability.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 16: 35568.

J. Roberts and R. Scapens 1990. “Accounting as Discipline.” In Critical Accounts: Reorienting Accounting Research, ed. D. Cooper and T. Hopper , pp. 107125. London: Macmillan.

J. Roberts and P Stiles . 1999. “The Relationship between Chairmen and Chief Executives; Competitive or Complementary Roles?” Long Range Planning 32: 3648.

H. Schwartz 1987. “Anti-social Actions of Committed Organizational Participants: An Existential Psychoanalytic Perspective.” Organization Studies 8: 327340.

H. Willmott 1998. “Towards a New Ethics? The Contributions for Poststructuralism and Posthumanism.” In Ethics and Organizations, ed. M. Parker , pp. 76121. London: Sage.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×