Admati, A. R. & Pfleiderer, P. C. 2009. The ‘Wall Street Walk’ and shareholder activism: Exit as a form of voice. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(7): 2445–2485.
Allen, F., Carletti, E., & Marquez, R. 2009. .
Anabtawi, I. 2007. Some skepticism about increasing shareholder power. Journal of Scholarly Perspectives, 3(1): 1–24.
Anabtawi, I. & Stout, L. 2008. Fiduciary duties for activist shareholders. Stanford Law Review, 60(5): 1255–1308.
Arenas, D., Lozano, J. M., & Albareda, L. 2009. The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1): 175–197.
Arjaliès, D. 2010. A social movement perspective on finance: How socially responsible investment mattered. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(Supplement 1): 57–78.
Arnold, D. G. 2013. Global justice and international business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 125–143.
Barnea, A. & Rubin, A. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97: 71–86.
Baur, D. & Arenas, D. 2014. The value of unregulated business-NGO interaction: A deliberative perspective. Business and Society, 53(2): 157–186.
Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B., & Thomson, I. 2007. Theorizing engagement: The potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3): 356–381.
Bebchuk, L. A. 2005. The case for increasing shareholder power. Harvard Law Review, 118(3): 835–914.
Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. 2009. Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8): 3093–3129.
Beck, U. 1994. Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Beschorner, T. 2006. Ethical theory and business practices: The case of discourse ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1): 127–139.
Brenkert, G. G. 1992. Freedom, participation and corporations: The issue of corporate (economic) democracy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3): 251–269.
Campbell, C. J., Gillan, S. L., & Niden, C. M. 1999. Current perspectives on shareholder proposals: Lessons from the 1997 proxy season. Financial Management, 28(1): 89–98.
Chung, H. & Talaulicar, T. 2010. Forms and effects of shareholder activism. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4): 253–257.
Clark, G. L., Salo, J., & Hebb, T. 2008. Social and environmental shareholder activism in the public spotlight: US corporate annual meetings, campaign strategies, and environmental performance. Environment and Planning A, 40(6): 1370–1390.
Cohen, J. 1997. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In Bohman, J. & Rehg, W. (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics: 67–92. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Coumans, C. 2012. Mining, human rights and the socially responsible investment industry: Considering community opposition to shareholder resolutions and implications of collaboration. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 2(1): 44–63.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 20–47.
den Hond, F. & de Bakker, F. G. A. 2007. Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 901–924.
Dhir, A. A. 2006. Realigning the corporate building blocks: Shareholder proposals as a vehicle for achieving corporate social and human rights accountability. American Business Law Journal, 43(2): 365–412.
Dhir, A. A. 2012. Shareholder engagement in the embedded business corporation: Investment activism, human rights, and TWAIL discourse. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1): 99–118.
Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.
Dryzek, J. S. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Elster, J. 1998. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engle, E. A. 2006. What you don’t know can hurt you: Human rights, shareholder activism and SEC reporting requirements. Syracuse Law Review, 57: 63–96.
Ferraro, F. & Beunza, D. 2014. Why talk? A process of model of dialogue in shareholder engagement, Working Paper Series, SSRN. London: London School of Economics.
FRC. 2012. .
Freeman, R. E. & Reed, D. L. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3): 88–106.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freshfields, . 2005. .
Garriga, E. & Mele, D. 2004. Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2): 51–71.
Gilbert, D. U. & Rasche, A. 2007. Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(2): 187–216.
Gillan, S. L. & Starks, L. T. 2007. The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(1): 55–73.
Glac, K. 2010. .
Goldstein, M. 2011. .
Goodman, J., Louche, C., van Cranenburgh, , , K. C., & Arenas, D. 2014. Social shareholder engagement: The dynamics of voice and exit. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2): 193–210.
Goranova, M. & Ryan, L. V. 2014. Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 40(5): 1230–1268.
Gorton, G. & Schmid, F. A. 2004. Capital, labor, and the firm: A study of German codetermination. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(5): 863–905.
Graves, S., Rehbein, K., & Waddock, S. 2001. Fad and fashion in shareholder activism: The landscape of shareholder resolutions, 1988-1998. Business and Society Review, 106(4): 293–314.
Guay, T., Doh, J., & Sinclair, G. 2004. Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism, and socially responsible investments: Ethical, strategic, and governance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 52: 125–139.
Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. 2004. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. (McCarthy, T., Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. 1987. The theory of communicative action vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. (McCarthy, T., Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. 1992. Moral consciousness and communicative action. (C. N. Lenhardt, S. W. (trans). Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (Rehg, W., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hebb, T., Hoepner, A., Rodionova, T., & Sanchez, I. 2014. Power and shareholder saliency, Working paper WP#14-01: 1–25. Ottawa: Carleton Centre for Community Innovation.
Hendry, J. 2001. Missing the target: Normative stakeholder theory and the corporate governance debate. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1): 159–176.
Hennchen, E. forthcoming. Royal Dutch Shell in Nigeria: Where do responsibilities end? Journal of Business Ethics: 1–25.
Hernandez, M. 2008. Promoting stewardship behavior in organizations: A leadership model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1): 121–128.
Hernandez, M. 2012. Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2): 172–193.
Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Holzer, B. 2008. Turning stakeseekers into stakeholders: A political coalition perspective on the politics of stakeholder influence. Business and Society, 47(1): 50–67.
Jamali, D. 2008. A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82: 213–231.
Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W., H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.
Jones, T. M. & Felps, W. 2013. Stakeholder happiness enhancement: A neo-utilitarian objective for the modern corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3): 349–379.
Kang, N. & Moon, J. 2012. Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: A comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1): 85–108.
Kraemer, R., Whiteman, G., & Banerjee, B. 2013. Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri: The importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements. Organization Studies, 34(5-6): 823–852.
Lee, M.-D. P. & Lounsbury, M. 2011. Domesticating radical rant and rage: An exploration of the consequences of environmental shareholder resolutions on corporate environmental performance. Business and Society, 50(1): 155–188.
Levit, D. & Malenko, N. 2011. Nonbinding voting for shareholder proposals. The Journal of Finance, 66(5): 1579–1614.
Logsdon, J. & Van Buren, H. 2009. Beyond the proxy vote: Dialogues between shareholder activists and corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 87: 353–365.
Lozano, J. F. 2001. Proposal for a model for the elaboration of ethical codes based on discourse ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(2): 157–162.
Lydenberg, S. 2007. Universal investors and socially responsible investors: A tale of emerging affinities. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(3): 467–477.
Mäkinen, J. & Kourula, A. 2012. Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4): 649–678.
Matten, D. & Crane, A. 2005. What is stakeholder democracy? Perspectives and issues. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1): 6–13.
McCarthy, T. 1992. Introduction, Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
McLaren, D. 2004. Global stakeholders: Corporate accountability and investor engagement. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(2): 191–201.
Monks, R., Miller, A., & Cook, J. 2004. Shareholder activism on environmental issues: A study of proposals at large US corporations (2000-2003). Natural Resources Forum, 28(4): 317–330.
Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. 2005. Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3): 429–453.
Moriarty, J. 2014. The connection between stakeholder theory and stakeholder democracy an excavation and defense. Business and Society, 53(6): 820–852.
Murphy, M. & Arenas, D. 2010. Through indigenous lenses: Cross-sector collaborations with fringe stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1): 103–121.
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O’Dwyer, B. 2005. Stakeholder democracy: challenges and contributions from social accounting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1): 28–41.
O’Rourke, A. 2003. A new politics of engagement: shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12: 227–239.
Palazzo, G. & Scherer, A. G. 2006. Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1): 71–88.
Phillips, R. A. 1997. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1): 51–66.
Proffitt, W. T. & Spicer, A. 2006. Shaping the shareholder activism agenda: institutional investors and global social issues. Strategic Organization, 4(2): 165–190.
Reed, D. 1999. Stakeholder management theory: A critical theory perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(3): 453–483.
Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. 2004. Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business and Society, 43(3): 239–267.
Rehbein, K., Logsdon, J. M., & Van Buren, H., J. 2013. Corporate responses to shareholder activists: Considering the dialogue alternative. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1): 137–154.
Richardson, B. J. 2008. Socially responsible investment law: Regulating the unseen polluters. New York: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, B. J. & Cragg, W. 2010. Being virtuous and prosperous: SRI’s conflicting goals. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1 Supplement): 21–39.
Richardson, B. J. 2013. Fiduciary responsibility in retail funds: Clarifying the prospects for SRI. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 3(1): 1–16.
Rojas, M., M’Zali, B., Turcotte, M.-F., & Merrigan, P. 2009. Bringing about changes to corporate social policy through shareholder activism: Filers, issues, targets, and success. Business and Society Review, 114(2): 217–252.
Ryan, L. V. 2000. Shareholders and the atom of property: Fission or fusion? Business and Society, 39(1): 49–75.
Scherer, A. G. & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward A political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1096–1120.
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. 2014. The business firm as a political actor: A new theory of the firm for a globalized world. Business and Society, 53(2): 143–156.
Schreck, P., van Aaken, D., & Donaldson, T. 2013. Positive economics and the normativistic fallacy: Bridging the two sides of CSR. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2): 297–329.
Sjöström, E. 2008. Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility: What do we know? Sustainable Development, 16: 141–154.
Sjöström, E. 2010. Shareholders as norm entrepreneurs for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 94: 177–191.
Smith, J. D. 2004. A précis of a communicative theory of the firm. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(4): 317–331.
Soskice, D. 1997. Stakeholding yes; the German model no. In Kelly, G. & Kelly, D. & Gamble, A. (Eds.), Stakeholder capitalism: 219–225. London: Macmillan Press.
Stansbury, J. 2009. Reasoned moral agreement: Applying discourse ethics within organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1): 33–56.
Stout, L. 2012. The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Tkac, P. 2006. One proxy at a time: Pursuing social change through shareholder proposals. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Third Quarter): 1–20.
Unerman, J. & Bennett, M. 2004. Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7): 685–707.
Van Cranenburgh, K. C., Goodman, J., Louche, C., & Arenas, D. 2012. . http://www.3ignet.org/: International Interfaith Investment Group (3iG).
Vandekerckhove, W., Leys, J., & Van Braeckel, D. 2007. That’s not what happened and it’s not my fault anyway! An exploration of managament attitudes towards SRI-shareholder engagement. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(4): 403–418.
Welcomer, S. A., Gioia, D. A., & Kilduff, M. 2000. Resisting the discourse of modernity: Rationality versus emotion in hazardous waste siting. Human Relations, 53(9): 1175–1205.
Whelan, G. 2012. The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4): 709–737.
Williams, C. C. & Ryan, L. V. 2007. Courting shareholders: The ethical implications of altering corporate ownership structures. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4): 669–688.
Woods, C. & Urwin, R. 2012. Putting sustainable investing into practice: A governance framework for pension funds. In Hebb, T. (Ed.), The Next Generation of Responsible Investing. Dordrecht: Springer.