Skip to main content

Ethics Programs and the Paradox of Control

  • Jason Stansbury and Bruce Barry

We analyze corporate ethics programs as control systems, arguing that how control is exercised may have pernicious consequences and be morally problematic. In particular, the control cultivated by ethics programs may weaken employees’ ability and motivation to exercise their own moral judgment, especially in novel situations. We develop this argument first by examining how organization theorists analyze control as an instrument of management coordination, and by addressing the political implications of control. We discuss coercive and enabling control as variations that help account for the distinction between compliance-based ethics programs and values-based ethics programs. We then explore three potential drawbacks of ethics programs: the specter of indoctrination, a politicization of ethics, and an atrophy of competence. Ethics programs that rely on coercive control may undermine their own effectiveness at stemming misbehavior.

Hide All
Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. 1996. Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 6189.
Barker, J. R. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 408–37.
Barnard, C. 1938/2001. The functions of the executive, 30th anniversary edition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
BellSouth. 2004. About ethics. Accessed December 13, 2004.
Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. 1989. The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32(1): 7389.
Braithwaite, J. 1989. Crime, shame, and reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Brehm, J. W. 1966. A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. 1981. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
Brehm, S. S., & Weinraub, M. 1977. Physical barriers and psychological reactance: 2-year-olds’ responses to threats to freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35: 830–36.
Clark, M. A., & Leonard, S. L. 1998. Can corporate codes of ethics influence behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 17: 619–31.
Collins, J., & Porras, J. I. 2002. Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: HarperBusiness Essentials.
Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. 1997. The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2): 159–80.
Desio, P. 2004. An overview of the organizational guidelines. Washington DC: United States Sentencing Commission. Accessed December 15, 2004.
Drory, A., & Romm, T. 1988. Politics in organization and its perception within the organization. Organization Studies, 9(2): 165–79.
Etzioni, A. 1990. The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: Free Press.
Ezzamel, M. & Willmott, H. 1998. Accounting for teamwork: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 358–96.
Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. 1992. Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 638–52.
Ferris, G., & Kacmar, K. M. 1992. Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18(1): 93116.
Fields, G. 2005. Ruling on sentencing guidelines may also affect corporate crime. The Wall Street Journal (January 17): A4.
Frankel, M. S. 1989. Professional codes: Why, how, and with what impact? Journal of Business Ethics, 8 (2,3): 109–15.
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine (September 13).
Garrison, R. H., & Noreen, E. W. 1997. Managerial accounting (8th ed.). Chicago: Irwin.
Gullapalli, D. 2004. Lapses at Fannie vindicate the case for the tough rules on accountability. Wall Street Journal (October 4): C1.
Habermas, J. 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action, trans. Lenhardt, C. & Nicholson, S. W.Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. 1993. Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics, trans. Cronin, C.Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
HamiltonJ. B., III J. B., III, & Berken, E. J. 2005. Exxon at Grand Bois, Louisiana: A three-level analysis of management decision making and corporate conduct. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15: 385408.
Jackall, R. 1988. Moral mazes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnson & Johnson. 2004. Our credo history. Accessed December 15, 2004.
Joseph, J. 2003. National business ethics survey: How employees view ethics in their organizations. Washington DC: Ethics Resource Center.
Kelman, H. C. 1958. Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2: 5160.
Laura, R. S. 1983. To educate or to indoctrinate: That is still the question. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 15: 4355.
LawlerE. L., III E. L., III, & Rhode, J. G. 1976. Information and control in organizations. Pacific Palisades CA: Goodyear.
Lunsford, J. L., & Pasztor, A. 2004. Higher plane: New boss struggles to lift Boeing above military scandals. The Wall Street Journal (July 14), A1.
Makkai, T., & Braithwaite, J. 1994. Reintegrative shaming and compliance with regulatory standards. Criminology, 32: 361–86.
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. 1996. The influence of collegiate and corporate codes of conduct on ethics-related behavior in the workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6: 461–76.
Metzger, M., Dalton, D. R., & Hill, J. W. 1993. The organization of ethics and the ethics of organizations: The case for expanded organizational ethics audits. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3: 2743.
Mintzberg, H. 1985. The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies, 22(2): 133–54.
Morrill, C., Zald, M. N., & Rao, H. 2003. Covert political conflict in organizations: Challenges from below. Annual Review of Sociology, 29: 391415.
Paine, L. S. 1994. Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(2): 106–19.
Parker, C. P., Dipboye, R. L., & Jackson, S. L. 1995. Perceptions of organizational politics: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management, 21(5): 891912.
Perrow, C. 1986. Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
Pershing, J. L. 2003. To snitch or not to snitch? Applying the concept of neutralization techniques to the enforcement of occupational misconduct. Sociological Perspectives, 46(2): 149–78.
Pfeffer, J. 1981. Power in organizations. Marshfield MA: Pitman.
Rest, J. R. 1994. Theory and research. In Rest, J. R. and Narvaez, D. (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. 1977. Who gets power—and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics (Winter): 321.
Simon, H. A. 1947/1997. Administrative behavior (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Snyder, M. L., & Wicklund, R. A. 1976. Prior exercise of freedom and reactance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12: 120–30.
Sonenshein, S. 2005. Business ethics and internal social criticism. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3): 475–98.
Tan, C. 2004. Indoctrination, imagination, and moral education. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Imagination and Education: Imagination in Educational Philosophy and Research, 113. Accessed December 14, 2005.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D. G., & Toffler, B. L. 1999. Managing ethics and legal compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review, 4(2): 131–51.
United States Sentencing Commission (USSC). 2004. Federal sentencing guidelines for organizations, chapter 8, part B—remedying harm from criminal conduct, and effective compliance and ethics program. Accessed December 15, 2004.
Vaughan, D. 1990. Autonomy, interdependence, and social control: NASA and the Space Shuttle Challenger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 225–57.
Walzer, M. 1994. Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Warhurst, C. 1998. Recognizing the possible: The organization and control of a socialist labor process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 470–97.
Weaver, G. R., & Treviño, L. K. 1999. Compliance and values oriented ethics programs: Influences on employees’ attitudes and behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9: 315–35.
Weaver, G. R., & Treviño, L. K. 2001. The role of human resources in ethics/compliance management: A fairness perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 11: 113–43.
Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. 1999a. Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990s: An empirical study of the Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(3): 283–94.
Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. 1999b. Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 4157.
Weber, M. 1946. “Bureaucracy.” In Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Werhane, P. 1999. Moral imagination and management decision making. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wicklund, R. A. 1974. Freedom and reactance. Potomac MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Worchel, S., & Brehm, J. W. 1970. Effect of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with the communicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14: 1822.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed