Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Leadership Ethics of Machiavelli’s Prince

  • Christopher E. Cosans (a1) and Christopher S. Reina (a1)
Abstract:

This article examines the place of Machiavelli’s Prince in the history of ethics and the history of leadership philosophy. Close scrutiny indicates that Machiavelli advances an ethical system for leadership that involves uprooting corruption and establishing rule of law. He draws on history and current affairs in order to obtain a realistic understanding of human behavior that forms a basis for a consequentialist ethics. While he claims a good leader might do bad things, this is in situations where necessity constrains a prince to choosing the “least bad” course of action. Furthermore, Machiavelli advocates winning the goodwill of followers through leadership as a source of power. Machiavelli’s leadership ethics has a sophistication not fully enjoyed by his reputation in management scholarship. He would not score as especially “Machiavellian” on the Mach IV. Many of his ideas contain seeds for theories that are now considered important for leadership today.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Leadership Ethics of Machiavelli’s Prince
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Leadership Ethics of Machiavelli’s Prince
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Leadership Ethics of Machiavelli’s Prince
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Ahearn, K. K., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Douglas, C., & Ammeter, A. P. 2004. Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30: 309327.
Alessa, H. M., Megdadi, O. D. 2014. Workplace bullying and unethical behaviors: A mediating model. International Journal of Business and Management, 9: 157169.
Alperovitz, G. 1996. The decision to use the atomic bomb. New York: Vintage.
Aquinas, T. 1273/1952. The Summa Theologica, volume II. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Encyclopedia Britannica.
Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. 2004. A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 10231034.
Ardito, A. M. 2015. Machiavelli and the modern state: The prince, the discourses on Livy, and the extended territorial republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aristotelis, 1990. Politica. Greek text edited by Ross, W. D.. Oxonii: E Typographeo Clarendonano.
Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press; Collier Macmillan.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. 2006. Transformational leadership. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Beakley, J. E. 2016. Supervisor-subordinate communication: Workplace bullying and the tyrannical mum effect. International Journal of Business and Management, 11: 3139.
Benner, E. 2016. Machiavelli’s prince: A new reading. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. 2006. Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5): 9981012.
Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. 1970. Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
Collins, J. C. 2001. Good to great: Why some companies make the leap. . . and others don’t. New York: Harper Business.
Conger, J. A. 1998. The necessity art of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 76(3): 8495.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. 1998. Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications.
Cronin, T. E. 2016. Machiavelli’s Prince. In Fuller, T. (Ed.), Machiavelli’s legacy: The Prince after five hundred years. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Dahling, J., Whitaker, B., & Levy, P. 2009. The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35: 219257.
Danoff, B. F. 2000. Lincoln, Machiavelli, and American political thought. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30: 290311.
Del Lucchese, F. 2009. Crisis and power: Economics, politics and conflict in Machiavelli’s political thought. History of Political Thought, 30: 7596.
Erwin, S. 2010. A war of one’s own: Mercenaries and the theme of arma aliena in Machiavelli’s il principe. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18(4): 541574.
Esser, J. K. 1998. Alive and well after 25 years: A review of groupthink research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 73(2): 116141.
Giorgini, G. 2008. Place of the tyrant in Machiavelli’s political thought. History of Political Thought, 29: 230256.
Greenleaf, R. K. 1977. Servant-leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
Fiedler, F. E. 1954. Assumed similarity measures as predictors of team effectiveness. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49: 381388.
Fiedler, F. E. 1958. Leader attitudes and group effectiveness. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Fiedler, F. E. 1967. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
French, J., & Raven, B. H. 1959. The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power: 150167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Fry, L. W. 2003. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14: 693727.
Fuller, T. (Ed.). 2016. Machiavelli’s legacy: The Prince after five hundred years. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goldsmith, M. 2007. What got you here won't get you there: How successful people become even more successful. New York: Hyperion.
Harris, P. 2010. Machiavelli and the global compass: Ends and means in ethics and leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 93: 131138.
House, R. J. 1971. A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16: 321339.
Hume, D. 1779/1961. Dialogues concerning natural religion. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
Janis, I. L. 1971. Groupthink. Psychology Today, 5(6): 4346.
Jurdjevic, M. 2014. A great and wretched city: Promise and failure in Machiavelli’s Florentine political thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kant, I. 1785/1990. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. Translated by Beck, L. W.. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Kant, I. 1785/1994. Grundlegung zur metaphysik der sitten. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Kant, I. 1795/1957. Perpetual peace. Translated by Beck, L. W.. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.
Landesman, C. 2003. Rawls on Hiroshima: An inquiry into the morality of the use of atomic weapons in August 1945. The Philosophical Forum, 34(1): 2138.
Machiavelli, N. 1513/1996. Machiavelli and his friends: Their personal correspondence. Translated by Atkinson, J. B. & Sices, D.. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.
Machiavelli, N. 1531/1900. Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito. Firenze: G. Barbera.
Machiavelli, N. 1531/1997. Discourses on Livy. Translated by Bondanella, J. C. & Bondanella, P.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Machiavelli, N. 1532, 1990. Florentine histories. Translated by Banfield, L. F. & Mansfield, H. C.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Machiavelli, N. 1532/1988. The prince. Edited by Skinner, Q. and edited and translated by Price, R.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Machiavelli, N. 1532/2013. Il principe/The prince. Italian/English bilingual text; Italian edited by Torino and translated by N. Hill-Thompson and Milton Keynes. Great Britain: JiaHu Books.
McCormick, J. P. 2015a. Machiavelli’s inglorious tyrants: On Agathocles, Scipio and unmerited glory. History of Political Thought, 36: 2952.
McCormick, J. P. 2015b. Of tribunes and tyrants: Machiavelli's legal and extra-legal modes for controlling elites. Ratio Juris, 28: 252266.
McCullough, D. 1992. Truman. New York: Simon and Shuster.
McDaniel, K. R., Ngala, F., & Moustafa, K. L. 2015. Does competency matter? Competency as a factor in workplace bullying. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30: 597609.
McGregor, D. 1960. The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mill, J. S. 1863/1987. Utilitarianism. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.
Mitroff, I. I. 2001. Crisis leadership. Executive Excellence, 18: 1922.
More, T. 1516/2003. Utopia. Translated by Turner, P.. London: Penguin Books.
Newman, R. P. 1995. Truman and the Hiroshima cult. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
O’Boyle, E. H. Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. 2012. A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3): 557579.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. 2002. The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36: 556563.
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. 2003. Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Peters, T. H., & Waterman, R. J. 1982. In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
Plato, 1981. Five dialogues (Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo). Translated by Grube, G. M. A.. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Rauthmann, J. F., & Will, T. 2011. Proposing a multidimensional Machiavellianism conceptualization. Social Behavior and Personality, 39: 391403.
Rauthmann, J. F. 2012. Towards multifaceted Machiavellianism: Content, factorial, and construct validity of a German Machiavellianism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 52: 345351.
Rawls, J., & Freeman, S. 1999. John Rawls: Collected papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reb, J., Narayanan, J., & Chaturvedi, S. 2014. Leading mindfully: Two studies on the influence of supervisor trait mindfulness on employee well-being and performance. Mindfulness, 5: 3645.
Reina, C. S. 2015. Adapting leader behaviors to achieve follower effectiveness: A mindful approach to situational leadership. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
Schwenk, C. R., & Cosier, R. A. 1980. Effects of the expert, devil’s advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26(3): 409424.
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. 1993. The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4): 577594.
Snook, S. A. 2008. Love and fear and the modern boss. Harvard Business Review, January: 1617.
Spector, R. H. 1985. Eagle against the sun: The American war with Japan. New York: Random House, Inc.
Spreitzer, G. M. 1995. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 14421465.
Van Dierendonck, D., & Nuijten, I. 2011. The servant leadership survey: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3): 249267.
Viroli, M. 2014. Redeeming the Prince: The meaning of Machiavelli’s masterpiece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Van Velsor, E., & Leslie, J. B. 1995. Why executives derail: Perspectives across time and cultures. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(4): 6272.
Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. 1996. Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2): 285299.
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y., & Li, X. 2015. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 538566.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 174
Total number of PDF views: 246 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1151 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th September 2017 - 26th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.