Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Managing Social-Business Tensions: A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise

  • Wendy K. Smith (a1), Michael Gonin (a2) and Marya L. Besharov (a3)
Abstract:

In a world filled with poverty, environmental degradation, and moral injustice, social enterprises offer a ray of hope. These organizations seek to achieve social missions through business ventures. Yet social missions and business ventures are associated with divergent goals, values, norms, and identities. Attending to them simultaneously creates tensions, competing demands, and ethical dilemmas. Effectively understanding social enterprises therefore depends on insight into the nature and management of these tensions. While existing research recognizes tensions between social missions and business ventures, we lack any systematic analysis. Our paper addresses this issue. We first categorize the types of tensions that arise between social missions and business ventures, emphasizing their prevalence and variety. We then explore how four different organizational theories offer insight into these tensions, and we develop an agenda for future research. We end by arguing that a focus on social-business tensions not only expands insight into social enterprises, but also provides an opportunity for research on social enterprises to inform traditional organizational theories. Taken together, our analysis of tensions in social enterprises integrates and seeks to energize research on this expanding phenomenon.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Managing Social-Business Tensions: A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Managing Social-Business Tensions: A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Managing Social-Business Tensions: A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Agle, B.R.Donaldson, T.Freeman, R.E.Jensen, M.C.Mitchell, R.K. & Wood, D.J. 2008. Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2): 15390. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200818214
Agle, B.R.Mitchell, R.K. & Sonnenfeld, J.A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 50725. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256973
Albert, S. & Whetten, D.A. 1985. Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 26395.
Alter, S.K. 2008. Social enterprise models and their mission and money relationship. Nicholls, A. (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change: 20532. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M.W. 2009. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4): 696717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
Anteby, M. & Wrzesniewski, A. Forthcoming In search of the self at work: Young adults’ experiences of a dual identity organization. Research in the Sociology of Work.
Argenti, P.A. 2004. Collaborating with activists: How Starbucks works with NGOs. California Management Review, 47(1): 91116. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166288
Argyris, C. 1988. Crafting a theory of practice: The case of organizational paradoxes. In Quinn, R. & Cameron, K. (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management: 25578. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Ashforth, B.E.Reingen, P.H. & Ward, J.C. 2013. Friend and foe? The dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, Provisional Accept.
Bartunek, J. 1988. The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In Quinn, R. & Cameron, K. (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management: 13762. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Battilana, J. & Dorado, S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 141940. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391
Battilana, J.Lee, M.Walker, J. & Dorsey, C. 2012. In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3) (Summer): 5155.
Battilana, J.Pache, A.C.Sengul, M. & Model, J. 2011. Beyond organizational instability and conflict: On the challenges of remaining hybrid. Working Paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Battilana, J.Pache, A.C.Sengul, M. & Model, J. 2013. Keeping a foot in both camps: Understanding the drivers of social performance in hybrid organizations. Working Paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Baur, D. & Palazzo, G. 2011. The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4): 579604. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq201121437
Beech, N.Burns, H.de Caestecker, L.MacIntosh, R. & MacLean, D. 2004. Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57(10): 13131332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726704048357
Bell, T. 2011. Being the only b. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(3): 2728.
Berger, I.E.Cunningham, P.H. & Drumwright, M.E. 2004. Social alliances: Company/nonprofit collaboration. California Management Review, 47: 5890. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166287
Berman, S.L.Wicks, A.C.Kotha, S. & Jones, T.M. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488506. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256972
Besharov, M.L. 2013. Toward a relational ecology of identification: A process model of managing identification based on divergent values. Working Paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY..
Besharov, M.L. & Smith, W.K. 2013. Multiple logics within organizations: An integrative framework and model of organizational hybridity. Working Paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Bornstein, D. 2004. How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bornstein, D. 2013. Beyond profit: A talk with Muhammad Yunus. New York Times. (April 17).
Borzaga, C. & Santuari, A. 2001. Italy: From traditional co-operatives to innovative social enterprises. In Borzaga, C. & Defourny, J. (Eds.), The emergence of social enterprise: 16681. London: Routledge.
Boyd, B.Henning, N.Reyna, E.Wang, D. & Welch, M. 2009. Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
Bromberger, A.R. 2011. A new type of hybrid. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(2): 4953.
Cameron, K. 1986. Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5): 53953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539
Cameron, K. & Lavine, M. 2006. Making the impossible possible: Leading extraordinary performance. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Chowdhury, I. & Santos, F.M. 2011. Gram vikas. In Hamschmidt, J. & Pirson, M. (Eds.), Case studies in social entrepreneurship and sustainability: 4368. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
Cooney, K. 2012. Mission control: Examining the institutionalization of new legal forms of social enterprise in different strategic action fields. In Gidron, B. & Hasenfeld, Y. (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Corley, K.G. & Gioia, D.A. 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2): 173208.
Cornforth, C. 2004. The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71: 1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x
Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dacin, M.T.Dacin, P.A. & Tracey, P. 2011. Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5): 120313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
Dacin, P.A.Dacin, M.T. & Matear, M. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 3757. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950
Davis, G.F. 1991. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4): 583613. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393275
Dees, J.G. 2001. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. http://www.caseatduke.org,Original draft: 1998, Revised 2001.
Dees, J.G. 2007. Taking social entrepreneurship seriously: Uncertainty, innovation, and social problem solving. Society 44(3): 2431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02819936
Dees, J.G. 2012. A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3): 32134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5
Dees, J.G.Battle Anderson, B. & Wei-Skillern, J. 2004. Scaling social enterpreneurship: Strategies for spreading social innovations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1(4): 2432.
Defourny, J. & Nyssens, M. 2010. Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneur-ship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1): 3253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053
Denis, J.-l.Langley, A. & Rouleau, L. 2006. The power of numbers in strategizing. Strategic Organization, 4(4): 34977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476127006069427
DiMaggio, P. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Zucker, L.G. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: 321. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W.W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 14760. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Donaldson, T. & Preston, L.E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 6591.
Driver, M. 2012. An interview with Michael Porter: Social entrepreneurship and the transformation of capitalism. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 42131.
Dutton, J. & Dukerich, J. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 51754. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256405
Ebrahim, A. & Rangan, V.K. 2010. Putting the brakes on impact: A contingency framework for measuring social impact. Academy of Management Proceedings.
Eisenhardt, K.M. & Westcott, B. 1988. Paradoxical demands and the creation of excellence: The case of just in time manufacturing. In Quinn, R. & Cameron, K. (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management: 1954. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Elsbach, K. 1999. An expanded model of organizational identification. In R. I. Sutton & B. M. Staw. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 21: 16399. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Elsbach, K. 2001. Coping with hybrid organizational identities: Evidence from California legislative staff. In Wagner, J. (Ed.), Advances in qualitative organizational research, vol. 3: 5990. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Epstein, M. 2008. Making sustainability work. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
Farjoun, M. 2010. Beyond dualism: Stability and change as duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 20225. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.48463331
Feldman, M.S. & Orlikowski, W.J. 2011. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22: 124053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
Fiol, C.M.Pratt, M.G. & O’Connor, E.J. 2009. Managing intractable identity conflict. Academy of Management Review, 34(1): 3255. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2009.35713276
Forcadell, F. 2005. Democracy, cooperation and business success: The case of Mondragón Corporación Cooperativa. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3): 25574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-5094-5
Ford, J. & Backoff, R. 1988. Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. In Quinn, R. & Cameron, K. (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management: 81121.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Foreman, P.O. & Whetten, D.A. 2002. Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13(6): 61835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.618.493
Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191205.
Galaskiewicz, J.Bielefeld, W. & Dowell, M. 2006. Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3): 33780.
Galaskiewicz, J. & Burt, R.S. 1991. Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1): 88105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393431
Glynn, M.A. 2000. When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3): 28598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496
Golden-Biddle, K. & Rao, H. 1997. Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a non profit organization. Organization Science, 8(6): 593611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.6.593
Gonin, M. 2007. Business research, self-fulfilling prophecy, and the inherent responsibility of scholars. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5(1): 3358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10805-007-9039-3
Greenwood, R.Díaz, A.M.Li, S.X. & Lorente, J.C. 2010. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2): 52139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0453
Greenwood, R.Raynard, M.Kodeih, F.Micelotta, E.R. & Lounsbury, M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 31771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590299
Grimes, M. 2010. Strategic sensemaking within funding relationships: The effects of performance measurement on organizational identity in the social sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4): 76383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00398.x
Gutierrez, B.Howard-Grenville, J. & Scully, M.A. 2010. The faithful rise up: Split identification and an unlikely change effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4): 67399. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814362
Haigh, N. & Hoffman, A.J. 2012. Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2): 12634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006
Hanleybrown, F.Kania, J. & Kramer, M.R. 2012. Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, blog entry. Available at http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/channeling_change_making_collective_impact_work.
Hart, K.Laville, J.-L. & Cattani, A.D. 2010. The human economy: A citizen’s guide. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Haugh, H. & Peredo, A.M. 2010. The origins, launch and diffusion of the community interest company, Academy of Management, Montreal.
Hoffman, A.J.Badiane, K.K. & Haigh, N. 2010. Hybrid organizations as agents of positive social change: Bridging the for-profit and non-profit divide. Working paper, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Hsu, G. 2006. Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3): 42050.
Jarzabkowski, P. 2008. Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4): 62150.
Jay, J. 2013. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 13759. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
Jensen, M.C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 23556. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857812
Jensen, M.C. 2008. Non-rational behavior, value conflict, stakeholder theory and firm behavior in dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2): 16771.
Kania, J. & Kramer, M. 2011. Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1): 3641.
Karnani, A.Garrette, B.Kassalow, J. & Lee, M. 2011. Better vision for the poor. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(2) (Spring): 6671.
Kraatz, M.S. & Block, E. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In Greenwood, R.Oliver, C.Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 24375. Los Angeles: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n10
Lawrence, T.Suddaby, R. & Leca, B. 2011. Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1) 5258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222
Levinthal, D. & March, J. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue): 95112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Lewis, M.W. 2000. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4): 76076.
Lewis, M.W.Andriopoulos, C. & Smith, W.K. Forthcoming. Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review.
Light, P.C. 2009. Social entrepreneurship revisited: Not just anyone, anywhere in any organization can make breakthrough change. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(3) (Summer): 2122.
Luscher, L. & Lewis, M. 2008. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2): 22140. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.31767217
Mair, J. & Martí, I. 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1): 3644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjwb.2005.09.002
Mair, J. & Martí, I. 2009. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5): 41935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.jbusvent.2008.04.006
Mair, J.Martí, I. & Ventresca, M.J. 2012. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 81950. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0627
March, J. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 7187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Margolis, J.D. & Walsh, J. 2003. Misery loves company: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3556659
Marquis, C. & Battilana, J. 2009. Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29: 283302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.001
Martin, R. 2007. The opposable mind: How successful leaders win through integrative thinking. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Mersland, R. & Strom, R.Ø. 2010. Microfinance mission drift?. World Development, 38(1): 2836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.006
Meyer, J.W. & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 34063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226550
Miller, T.L.Wesley, C.L. & Williams, D.E. 2012. Educating the minds of caring hearts: Comparing the views of practitioners and educators on the importance of social entrepreneurship competencies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 34970. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0017
Mitchell, R.K.Agle, B.R. & Wood, D. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholer indentification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 85396.
Moon, J.Crane, A. & Matten, D. 2005. Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3): 42953. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200515329
Moss, T.W.Short, J.C.Payne, G.T. & Lumpkin, G.T. 2011. Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4): 80530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00372.x
Nag, R.Corley, K.G. & Gioia, D.A. 2007. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge crafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4): 82147. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279173
Navis, C. & Glynn, M.A. 2011. Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3): 47999. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.61031809
Negro, G.Kocak, O. & Hsu, G. 2010. Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, 31: 335.
Nicholls, A. & Opal, C. 2004. Fair trade: Market-driven ethical consumption. London: Sage Publications.
Ogden, S. & Watson, R. 1999. Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 52638. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256974
Orlitzky, M.Schmidt, F.L. & Rynes, S.L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3): 40341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
Pache, A.C. 2013. From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises. Working paper, Insead University, Fontainebleau, France.
Pache, A.C. & Chowdhury, I. 2012. Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 494510. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0019
Pache, A.C. & Santos, F. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3): 45576. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368
Pache, A.C. Forthcoming. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G.R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Phillips, R.A. & Freeman, R.E. 2008. Corporate citizenship and community stakeholders. In Scherer, A.G. & Palazzo, G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship: 99115. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Poole, M.S. & Van de Ven, A. 1989. Using paradox to build management and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 56278.
Porter, T.M. 1995. Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Powell, W.W. & Colyvas, J. 2008. Microfoundations of institutional theory. In Greenwood, R.Oliver, C.Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 27698. Los Angeles: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n11
Prahalad, C.K. 2006. The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Delhi: Pearson Education India.
Pratt, M.G. 2000. The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3): 45693.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667106
Pratt, M.G. & Corley, K. 2007. Managing multiple organizational identities: On identity ambiguity, identity conflict, and members’ reactions. In Bartel, C.A.Blader, S. & Wrzesniewski, A. (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization: 99118. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pratt, M.G. & Foreman, P.O. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 1842.
Pratt, M.G. & Kraatz, M.S. 2009. E pluribus unum: Multiple identities and the organizational self. In Roberts, L.M. & Dutton, J.E. (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 385410. New York: Psychology Press.
Pratt, M.G. & Rafaeli, A. 1997. Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4): 86298.
Quinn, R. & Cameron, K. 1998. Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Rothenberg, A. 1979. The emerging goddess Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rowley, T.J. & Moldoveanu, M. 2003. When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 20419.
Seelos, C. & Mair, J. 2005. Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48: 24146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006
Seelos, C. & Mair, J. 2007. Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4): 4963. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2007.27895339
Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in administration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Seo, M. & Creed, W. 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 22247.
Sisón, A.J.G.Hartman, E.M. & Fontrodona, J. 2012. Reviving tradition: Virtue and the common good in business and management. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2): 20710.
Smith, K. 2002. Manna in the wilderness of AIDS: Ten lessons in abundance. Cleveland: Pilgrim Press.
Smith, K. & Berg, D. 1987. Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Smith, W.K. 2013. Dynamic response patterns to paradoxical tensions: A model of senior leadership practices to manage ambidexterity. Working paper, University of Delaware, Newark.
Smith, W.K.Besharov, M.L.Wessels, A. & Chertok, M. 2012. A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 46378. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0021
Smith, W.K.Leonard, H. & Epstein, M. 2007. Digital divide data: A social enterprise in action. Harvard Business School Case Study.
Smith, W.K. & Lewis, M.W. 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 381403. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
Smith, W.K.Lewis, M.W. & Tushman, M. 2011. Organizational sustainability: Organization design and senior leadership to enable strategic paradox. In Cameron, K. & Spreitzer, G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 798810. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, W.K. & Tushman, M.L. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5): 52236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
Snaith, I. 2007. Recent reforms to corporate legal structures for social enterprise in the UK: Opportunity or confusion. Social Enterprise Journal, 3(1): 2030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17508610780000719
Sonenshein, S. 2006. Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 115872. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478243
Stohl, C. & Cheney, G. 2001. Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3): 349407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318901143001
Stoltzfus, K.Stohl, C. & Seibold, D.R. 2011. Managing organizational change: Paradoxical problems, solutions, and consequences. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3): 34967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132749
Stuart, T.E.Hoang, H. & Hybels, R.C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 31549. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666998
Suchman, M.C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571610.
Sundaramurthy, C. & Lewis, M. 2003. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 397415.
Swartz, J. 2010. How I did it: Timberland’s CEO on standing up to 65,000 angry activists. Harvard Business Review, 88(9): 3943.
Thompson, J. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thornton, P.H. 2002. The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 81101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069286
Thornton, P.H.Ocasio, W. & Lounsbury, M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tracey, P. 2012. Introduction: Digital resources and textbooks for teaching social entrepreneurship and innovation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 51111. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0212
Tracey, P. & Phillips, N. 2007. The distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(2): 26471. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2007.25223465
Tracey, P.Phillips, N. & Haugh, H. 2005. Beyond philanthropy: Community enterprise as a basis for corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4): 32744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-6944-x
Tracey, P.Phillips, N. & Jarvis, O. 2011. Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1): 6080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0522
Treviño, L.K. & Weaver, G.R. 1999. The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists-not convergent theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 22227.
Vince, R. & Broussine, M. 1996. Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies, 17(1): 121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069601700101
Voss, G.B.Cable, D.M. & Voss, Z.G. 2008. Linking organizational values to relationships with external constituents: A study of nonprofit professional theatres. Organization Science, 11(3): 33047. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.3.330.12497
Wang, J. & Dewhirst, H.D. 1992. Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(2): 11523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00872318
Weaver, G.R.Treviño, L.K. & Cochran, P.L. 1999. Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressure, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 53952. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256975
Westenholz, A. 1993. Paradoxical thinking and change in frames of reference. Organization Studies, 14(1): 3758.
Yunus, M. 1999. Banker to the poor. New York: Public Affairs.
Yunus, M. 2010. Building social business : The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs.
Zahra, S.A.Gedajlovic, E.Neubaum, D. & Shulman, J.M. 2009. A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5): 51932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
Zuckerman, E. 1999. The cateogrical imperative: Securities analysis and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5): 13981438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/210178
Zuckerman, E. 2000. Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3): 591619. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667110
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed