Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 47
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Apostolakis, George Kraanen, Frido and van Dijk, Gert 2016. Examining pension beneficiaries’ willingness to pay for a socially responsible and impact investment portfolio: A case study in the Dutch healthcare sector. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Vol. 11, p. 27.

    Diouf, Dominique Hebb, Tessa and Touré, El Hadji 2016. Exploring Factors that Influence Social Retail Investors’ Decisions: Evidence from Desjardins Fund. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 134, Issue. 1, p. 45.

    Dorfleitner, Gregor and Nguyen, Mai 2016. Which proportion of SR investments is enough? A survey-based approach. Business Research, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Hafenstein, Andrea and Bassen, Alexander 2016. Influences for using sustainability information in the investment decision-making of non-professional investors. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, p. 1.

    de Zwaan, Laura Brimble, Mark and Stewart, Jenny 2015. Member perceptions of ESG investing through superannuation. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 79.

    Sandberg, Joakim and Nilsson, Jonas 2015. Do ethical investors want purity or effectiveness? An exploratory study on the ethical preferences of mutual fund investors. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 34.

    von Wallis, Miriam and Klein, Christian 2015. Ethical requirement and financial interest: a literature review on socially responsible investing. Business Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 61.

    Wins, Anett and Zwergel, Bernhard 2015. Private ethical fund investors across countries and time: a survey-based review. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Vol. 7, Issue. 4, p. 379.

    Dorfleitner, Gregor and Utz, Sebastian 2014. Profiling German-speaking socially responsible investors. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 118.

    Jansson, Magnus Sandberg, Joakim Biel, Anders and Gärling, Tommy 2014. Should pension funds’ fiduciary duty be extended to include social, ethical and environmental concerns? A study of beneficiaries’ preferences. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 213.

    Nilsson, Jonas Jansson, Johan Isberg, Sofia and Nordvall, Anna-Carin 2014. Customer satisfaction with socially responsible investing initiatives: The influence of perceived financial and non-financial quality. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 265.

    Peifer, Jared L. 2014. Fund Loyalty Among Socially Responsible Investors: The Importance of the Economic and Ethical Domains. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 121, Issue. 4, p. 635.

    Berry, R. H. and Yeung, F. 2013. Are Investors Willing to Sacrifice Cash for Morality?. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 117, Issue. 3, p. 477.

    Bilbao-Terol, Amelia Arenas-Parra, Mar Cañal-Fernández, Verónica and Bilbao-Terol, Celia 2013. Selection of Socially Responsible Portfolios Using Hedonic Prices. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 115, Issue. 3, p. 515.

    Sandberg, Joakim 2013. (Re-)Interpreting Fiduciary Duty to Justify Socially Responsible Investment for Pension Funds?. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 21, Issue. 5, p. 436.

    Alexander, David L Sailors, John J Al-Khatib, Jamal A and Al-Habib, Mohammed I 2012. The effect of near- versus distant-future mindsets on socially responsible investors’ mutual fund preferences. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 67.

    Dutta, Saurav Lawson, Raef and Marcinko, David 2012. Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications of Management Theory. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Glac, Katherina 2012. The Impact and Source of Mental Frames in Socially Responsible Investing. Journal of Behavioral Finance, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 184.

    Wells, V. Greenwell, F. Covey, J. Rosenthal, H. E. S. Adcock, M. and Gregory-Smith, D. 2012. An exploratory investigation of barriers and enablers affecting investment in renewable companies and technologies in the UK. Interface Focus, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 20120039.

    Eccles, N. S. and Viviers, S. 2011. The Origins and Meanings of Names Describing Investment Practices that Integrate a Consideration of ESG Issues in the Academic Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 104, Issue. 3, p. 389.


Morals and Markets: The Case of Ethical Investing


This paper is a report of an empirical psychological study of the relationship between the ethical and financial beliefs and desires of ethical investors. Semi-structured interviews of 20 ethical investors have been carried out by the project 10 of which have been analysed using qualitative data analysis software. All of our participants faced the problem that, while they had ethical concerns, they were not prepared to sacrifice their essential financial requirements to address them. We found four common ways of dealing with this problem: they divided up their money into core and surplus accounts; they decided that it was enough to only be a partial ethical investor; they avoided detailed consideration of the costs of ethical investment; and they avoided rigorous ethical thinking. One equilibrium position arising from these responses is a portfolio approach to ethics, which allows people to assuage their consciences by investing only a small proportion of their investments ethically, while leaving the rest in non-ethical investment vehicles.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Cullis ; A. Lewis ; and A. Winnett 1992. “Paying to be Good: UK Ethical Investment.” Kyklos 45, no. 1: 324.

A. Lewis and J. Cullis 1990. “Ethical investments: preferences and morality.” Journal of Behavioural Economics 19: 395441.

W. Samuelson and R. Zeckhauser 1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 759.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *