Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Political Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Research Agenda

  • Glen Whelan (a1)
Abstract:

I here advance a critical research agenda for the political perspective of corporate social responsibility (Political CSR). I argue that whilst the ‘Political’ CSR literature is notable for both its conceptual novelty and practical importance, its development has been hamstrung by four ambiguities, conflations and/or oversights. More positively, I argue that ‘Political’ CSR should be conceived as one potential form of globalization, and not as a consequence of ‘globalization’; that contemporary Western MNCs should be presumed to engage in CSR for instrumental reasons; that ‘Political’ CSR should be associated with a corresponding ‘political’ model of corporate governance; and that both a ‘Rawlsian’ and ‘Habermasian’ perspective of Political CSR are different from ‘Political’ CSR. In concluding, I use these four critiques to identify a number of areas within which increasingly robust and sophisticated positive and normative theories of Political CSR are required.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E.,Williams, C.A., &Ganapathi, J. 2007. Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 836–63.
Amazon Web Services. 2010. Blog Posting.Amazon Web Services Blog(December 2). Available from http://aws.amazon.com/message/65348/. Accessed May 5, 2011.
Amnesty International. 2010. Google stops its censorship in China: Amnesty response.Amnesty News(January 13). Available fromhttp://www.amnesty.org.uk/news_details .asp?NewsID=18572. Accessed November 16, 2010.
Angle, S.C. 2005. Decent democratic centralism. Political Theory, 33(4): 518–46.
Berle, A. A. Jr., 1932. For whom corporate managers are trustees: A note. Harvard Law Review, 45(7): 1365–72.
Bernstein, A. R. 2007. Human rights, global justice, and disaggregated states: John Rawls, Onora O’Neill and Anne-Marie Slaughter. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66(1): 8772.
Blanchfield, L. 2011. The United Nations Human Rights Council: Issues for Congress. CRS report for Congress, 7-5700 (January 26). Available from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33608.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2011.
Boatright, J. R. 2006. What's wrong—and what's right—with stakeholder management. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(2): 106–30.
Boddewyn, J.J., &Brewer, T.L. 1995. International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19(1): 119–43.
Bonardi, J.-P., Hillman, A., &Keim, G. 2005. The attractiveness of political markets: Implication for firm strategies. Academy of Management Review, 30(3): 397413.
Bowie, N.E. 1999. Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
BP.N.D. Website.http://bp.com. Accessed June 16, 2012.
Bull, H. 1995. The anarchical society: A study of order in world politic. (2nd ed.). Houndsmills, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
Bull, H., &Watson, A. (Eds.) 1984. The expansion of international society. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights (BLIHR). 2008. Statement of support for Rug-gie's protect, respect and remedy framework. Available from http://198.170.85.29/ BLIHR-statement-Ruggie-report-2008.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2009.
Cohen, C. L. 1989. Deliberation and democratic legitimacyIn A. Hamlin and B. Pettit (Eds.).The good polity: 1734. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, S. M., &Owen, D.L. 2007. Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8): 649–67.
Crane, A., Matten, D., &Moon, J. 2008. Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C., &Ro, J.-P. 2007. The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2): 169–87.
Detomasi, D.A. 2007. The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3): 321–34.
DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theoryIn L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment: 321. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
Donaldson, T., &Dunfee, T.W. 1994. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2): 252–84.
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Drezner, D. W. 2007. All politics is global. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Drummond, D. 2010. A new approach to China. The official Google blog(January 12). Available from http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china. html. Accessed November 16, 2010.
Dunning, J.H., &Lundan, S.M. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Evan, W. M., &Freeman, R.E. 1988. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Beauchamp, T.L. &Bowie, N.E.(Eds.). Ethical theory in business (3rd Edition): 97106. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Freeman, S. 2007. Rawls. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.
Friedman, M. 1982. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gienger, V., &Capaccio, T. 2010. Clinton condemns WikiLeaks release as ‘attack’ on U.S. efforts. Bloomberg Business Week (November 29). Available from http:// www.businessweek.com/news/2010-11-29/clinton-condemns-wikileaks-release -as-attack-on-u-s-efforts.html. Accessed May 5, 2011.
Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., &Waddock, S. 2011. . Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1): 2344.
Gilpin, R. 2001. Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Global Business Initiative on Human Rights (GBI). 2010. Statement of support for Rug-gie's draft guiding principles(December 10). Available from http://www.global -business-initiative.org/srsg/GBI%20Statement%20Dec%2010%202010.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2011.
Global Network Initiative. N.D. Website.http://www.globalnetworkinitiative.org/. Accessed December 6, 2010.
Gourevitch, P. A., &Shinn, J. 2005. Political power and corporate control: The new global politics of corporate governance Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, trans. Burger, T. and Lawrence, F. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action, trans. Lenhardt, C. and Weber Nicholsen, S. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. 1995. Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Raw-ls’s Political Liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(3): 109–31.
Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, trans. Rehg, W. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. 1998. Remarks on legitimation through human rights. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 24(2/3): 157–71.
Habermas, J. 2001. The postnational constellation: Political essays, trans. Pensky, M. Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. 2008. Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays, trans. Cronin, C. Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. 2009. Europe: The faltering project. Cambridge: Polity.
Haufler, V. 2010. Disclosure as governance: The extractive industries transparency initiative and resource management in the developing world. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3): 5373.
Heath, J. 2001. Communicative action and rational choice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Heath, J. &Norman, W. 2004. Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of state-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3): 247–65.
Hotten, R. 2010. Google’s rift with China is a calculated business risk. BBC News (March 26). Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8587129.stm. Accessed November 16, 2010.
Hsieh, N.-h. 2009. Does global business have a responsibility to promote just institutions? Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2): 251–73.
Hu, J., 2005. Build towards a harmonious world of lasting peace and common prosperity. Speech delivered at the High-Level Plenary Meeting of the United Nations 60th session, New York (September 15). Available from http://sy.chineseembassy.org/eng/ xwfb/t213754.htm Accessed February 17, 2010.
Human Rights Watch. 2011. UN Human Rights Council: Weak stance on business standards. Human Rights Watch News (June 16). Available from http://www.hrw.org/ en/news/2011/06/16/un-human-rights-council-weak-stance-business-standards. Accessed June 17, 2011.
Jerbi, S. 2011. UN adopts guiding principles on business and human rights-what comes next? Institute for human rights and business. Staff Commentary (June 17). Available from http://www.ihrb.org/commentary/staff/un_adopts_guiding_principles_ on_business_and_human_rights.html. Accessed June 17, 2011.
Kant, I. 2006. An answer to the question: What is enlightenment?In P. Kleingeld (Ed.), Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace and History trans. Colclasur:, D.L. 1723. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Keohane, R. O. 1984. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keping, Y. 2008. Ideological change and incremental democracy in reform-era ChinaIn C. Li (Ed.), China's changing political landscape: Prospects for democracy: 4458. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Kobrin, S.J. 2005. Multinational corporations, the protest movement, and the future of global governance In Chandler, A. D. Jr. &Mazlish, B. (eds.), Leviathans: Multinational corporations and the new global history: 219–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kobrin, S.J. 2009. Private political authority and public responsibility: Transnational politics, transnational firms, and human rights Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3): 349–74.
Krasner, S.D. 1991. Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics, 43(3): 336–66.
Lea, D. 2004. The imperfect nature of corporate responsibilities to stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2): 201–17.
Levy, S. 2011. Inside Google's China misfortune. Fortune (April 15). Available from http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/04/15/googles-ordeal-in-china/. Accessed June 6, 2011.
Maitland, I. 2001. Distributive justice in firms: Do the rules of corporate governance matter? Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1): 129–43.
Marcoux, A. M. 2003. A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1): 124.
Matten, D., &Crane, A. 2005. Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 166–79.
McWilliams, A., &Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 117–27.
McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D.D., &Cory, K.D. 2002. Raising rivals' costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5): 707–23.
Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Meyer, J.W., Drori, G.S., &Hwang, H. 2006. World society and the proliferation of formal organization. In Drori, G.S. Meyer, J. W., &Hwang, H. (Eds.): 2549. Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Meyer, J.W., &Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–63.
Moon, J., Crane, A., &Matten, D. 2005. Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3): 429–53.
Moon, J. D. 2003. Rawls and Habermas on public reason: Human rights and global justice. Annual Review of Political Science, 6: 257–74.
Néron, P.-Y., &Norman, W. 2008. Citizenship, inc.: Do we really want businesses to be good corporate citizens? Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1): 126.
Nike, . 2005. Restated articles of incorporation of Nike, Inc. (as amended September 23 2005. Available from http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/ data/320187/000032018705000124/exhibit-3_1.txt. Accessed June 13, 2012.
Noland, J., &Phillips, R. 2010. Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 3949.
Novo-Nordisk, . Website. http://www.novonordisk.com. Accessed June 16, 2012.
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Nussbaum, M.C. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145–79.
O'Neill, O. 1989. Constructions of reason: Explorations of Kant's practical philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Neill, O. 2000. Bounds of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Neill, O. 2001. Agents of justice. Metaphilosophy. 32(1/2): 180–95.
Palazzo, G., &Scherer, A.G. 2006. Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1): 7788.
PayPal, . 2010. PayPal statement regarding WikiLeaks. PayPal Blog (December 2). Available from https://www.thepaypalblog.com/2010/12/paypal-statement-regarding-wikileaks/. Accessed May 5, 2011.
Purdy, R. 2009. Using earth observation technologies for better regulatory compliance and enforcement of environmental laws. Journal of Environmental Law, 22(1): 5987.
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. 1999a. The idea of public reason revisited. In Rawls, J. The law of peoples, with ”the idea of public reason revisited“: 131–80. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. 1999b. The law of peoples. In Rawls, J. The law of peoples, with “the idea of public reason revisited“: 3128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. 2001 Justice as fairness: a restatement. Delhi: Universal Law Publishing.
Rawls, J. 2005 Political liberalism (expanded ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Reporters without Borders.2010. Google rebels against China's internet censors. Press release (January 14). Available from http://en.rsf.org/china-google-rebels-against-china-s-14-01-2010,36059. Accessed November 16, 2010.
Roach, B. 2005. A primer on multinational corporations. In Chandler, A.D. Jr. &Ma-zlish, B.(Eds.), Leviathans: Multinational corporations and the new global history: 1944. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ROCIC (Regulator of Community Interest Companies). 2007. Community interest companies: Briefing pack Cardiff: TROCIC. Available from http://www.network2012. net/community/resources/cicreg_cic_briefing_pack.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2009.
ROCIC (Regulator of Community Interest Companies). 2010. Annual report 2009-10. Available from http://www.cicregulator.gov.uk/news/Annual%20Report/Annual%20Report%202009-10-%20Final.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2011.
Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, relativism and truth: Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. 1993. Putnam and the relativist menace. The Journal of Philosophy, 90(9): 443–61.
Ruggie, J.G. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2): 379415.
Ruggie, J.G. 1998. What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International Organization, 54(4): 855–85.
Ruggie, J. G. 2003. Taking embedded liberalism global: The corporate connection. In Held, D. &Koenig-Archibugi, M.(Eds.), Taming globalization: Frontiers of governance: 93129. Cambridge: Polity.
Ruggie, J.G. 2004. Reconsituting the global public domain: Issues, actors, and practices. European Journal of International Relations, 10(4): 499529.
Rorty, R. 2008a. Embedding global markets: An enduring challenge. Aldershot,Hampshire: Ashgate.
Rorty, R. 2008b. EProtect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, U.N. Doc A/HRC/8/5 (April 7).
Rorty, R. 2011 Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, U.N. Doc A/HRC/17/31 (March 21).
Scherer, A.G. &Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate social responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 10961120.
Scherer, A.G. &Palazzo, G. 2008. Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In Crane, A. Mc-Williams, D. Moon, J. &Siegel, D. S.(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: 413–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scherer, A.G. &Palazzo, G. 2010. The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4): 899931.
Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G., &Baumann, D. 2006. Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4): 505–32.
Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G., &Matten, D. 2009. Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3): 327–47.
Schmidt, E., &Cohen, J. 2010. The digital disruption. Foreign Affairs, 89(6): 7585.
Scholte, J. A. 2005. Globalization: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford:.
Smith, A. 1986(1776). The wealth of nations-Books I-III. London: Penguin Classics.
Smith, C. 2006. Statement. The internet in China: A tool for freedom or suppression? Joint Hearing, House of Representatives, 109th Congress, Second Session (February 15). Available from http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/archives/109/26075.pdfAccessed 15/11/2010.
Social Investment Forum Foundation. 2010. Report on socially responsible investing trends in the United States. Available from http://ussif.org/resources/. Accessed June 24, 2011.
Stout, L. 2012. The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Tan, K.-C. 2006. The problem of decent peoples. In Martin, R. &Reidy, D. A.(Eds). Raw-ls's law of peoples: A realistic utopia?: 7694. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Tierney, B. 1982. Religion, law, and the growth of constitutional thought, 1150-1650. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2010. World investment report 2010: Investing in a low-carbon economy. New York: United Nations Publications.
van Oosterhout, J.(Hans). 2008. Transcending the confines of economic and political organization: The misguided metaphor of corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1): 3542.
WBCSD & WZB (World Business Council for Sustainable Development & Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung). 2003. Intellectual property rights in biotechnology and healthcare: Results of a stakeholder dialogue. Switzerland: WBCSD.
Wenar, L. 2006. Why Rawls is not a cosmopolitan egalitarian. In Martin, R. &Re-idy, D. A.(Eds.). Rawls’s law of peoples: A realistic utopia?: 95113. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Whelan, G., Moon, J., &Orlitzky, M. 2009. Human rights, transnational corporations and embedded liberalism: What chance consensus? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(supplement2): 367–83.
Willke, H., &Willke, G. 2008. Corporate moral legitimacy and the legitimacy of morals: A critique of Palazzo/Scherer’s communicative framework Journal of Business Ethics 81(1): 2738.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed