Skip to main content Accessibility help

Positive Economics and the Normativistic Fallacy: Bridging the Two Sides of CSR

  • Philipp Schreck (a1), Dominik van Aaken (a1) and Thomas Donaldson (a2)


In response to criticism of empirical or “positive” approaches to corporate social responsibility (CSR), we defend the importance of these approaches for any CSR theory that seeks to have practical impact. Although we acknowledge limitations to positive approaches, we unpack the neglected but crucial relationships between positive knowledge on the one hand and normative knowledge on the other in the implementation of CSR principles. Using the structure of a practical syllogism, we construct a model that displays the key role of empirical knowledge in fulfilling a firm’s responsibility to society, paying special attention to the implications of the “ought implies can” dictum. We also defend the importance of one particular class of empirical claims; namely, claims from the field of economics. Even positive economic theory, which is often criticized for endorsing profits rather than values, can cooperate in intriguing ways with non-economic concepts in the implementation of CSR goals.



Hide All
Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22: 4562.
Aristotle, . 1925/1998. The Nicomachean ethics, trans. Ross, W.D.New York: Oxford University Press.
Axelrod, R., 1981. The emergence of cooperation among egoists. The American Political Science Review, 75: 30618.
Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. 2003. Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12: 419–45.
Balzer, W., Moulines, C.U., & Sneed, J.D. 1987. An architectonic for science: the structuralist approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Balzer, W., Sneed, J.D., & Moulines, C.U.(Eds.). 2000. Structuralist knowledge representation: paradigmatic examples. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Banerjee, S.B., 2003. Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24: 143–80.
Barley, S.R. 2007. Corporations, democracy, and the public good. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16: 201–15.
Barnett, M.L., & King, A.A. 2008. Good fences make good neighbours: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 1150–70.
Baron, D.P. 2001. Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10: 745.
Baron, D.P. 2009. A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18: 743.
Beauchamp, T.L., Bowie, N.E., & Arnold, D.G. (Eds.) 2009. Ethical theory and business (8th ed.) Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Becker, G.S. 1993. Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. The Journal of Political Economy, 101: 385–W9.
Beirlaen, M. 2011. Ethical consistency and the logic of ought. Theoretical & Applied Ethics, 1: 4551.
Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. 2007. Retailing public goods: the economics of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics, 91: 1645–63.
Biedermann, R., 2006. From a weak letter of intent to prevalence: The toy industries’ code of conduct. Journal of Public Affairs, 6: 197209.
Blair, M.M., & Stout, L.A. 1999. Team production in business organizations: An introduction. Journal of Corporation Law, 24: 743.
Blaug, M. 1980. The methodology of positive economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonardi, J.-P., Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. 2005. The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30: 397413.
Borck, J.C., & Coglianese, C. 2009. Voluntary environmental programs: Assessing their effectiveness. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34: 305–24.
Bowen, H.R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
Bowie, N., & Dunfee, T. 2002. Confronting morality in markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 38: 381–93.
Bowie,N.E. ,N.E. 1999. Business ethics: A Kantian perspective.Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Bowie, N.E. 2002. A Kantian approach to business ethics In Frederick, R.A. (Ed.), A companion to business ethics: 316. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brennan, G. & Buchanan, J.M. 1985. The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, T.J., & Dacin, P.A. 1997. The company and the product: corporate Associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61: 6884.
Buchanan, J.M. 1987. Constitutional economics In Newman, P., Eatwell, J. & Milgate, M. (Ed.), The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics: 1: 585–88.
Campbell, J.L. 1989. Corporations, collective organization, and the state: Industry response to the accident at Three Mile Island. Social Science Quarterly, 70: 650–66.
Campbell, J.L. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32: 946–67.
Carroll, A.B. 2008. A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices In Crane, A.McWilliams, D.Moon, J. & Siegel, D.S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: 1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, C.R., & Jennings, M.M. 2002. Social responsibility and supply chain relationships. Transportation Research Part E, 38: 3752.
Christmann, P. 2000. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 66380.
de Bakker, F.G., Groenewegen, P. & Hond, F.d. 2005. A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance Business & Society, 44: 283317.
Deetz, S. 1996. Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy Organization Science, 7: 191207.
Dhaliwal, D.S., Li, O.Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y.G. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reportingce The Accounting Review, 86: 59100.
Doh, J.P., Howton, S.D., Howton, S.W., & Siegel, D.S. 2010. Does the market respond to endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information, and legitimacy Journal of Management, 36: 1461–85.
Donaldson, T. 1994. When integration fails: The logic of prescription and description in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 157–69.
Donaldson, T. 2012. The epistemic fault line in corporategovernance. Academy of Management Review, 37: 256–71.
Donaldson, T. & Dunfee, T.W. 1994. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19: 252–84.
Donaldson, T. & Dunfee, T.W. 1999. Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.L. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. . Academy of Management Review, 20: 6591.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B., & Sen, S. 2007. Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24: 224–41.
Dunfee, T.W. & Donaldson, T. 2002a. Social contract approaches to business ethics: Bridging the “is-ought” gap. In R. A. Frederick (Ed.), A Companion to Business Ethics. 3855. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dunfee, T.W. & Donaldson, T. 2002b. In Bowie, N. (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to business ethics. 6176. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. 2002. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability Business Strategy & the Environment, 11: 130–41.
Frank, R.H. 1996. Can socially responsible firms survive in a competitive environment? In Messick, D.M. & Tenbrunsel, A.E. (Ed.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. 86103. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Frankena, W.K. 1939. The naturalistic fallacy. Mind, 48: 464–77.
Frederick, W.C. 1994. From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & Society, 33: 150–64.
Friedman, M. 1953. The methodology of positive economics In Friedman, M. (Ed.), Essays in positive economics. 343. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. (September 13): 32.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. 2004. Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53: 5171.
Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B.& Hansen, J.M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis Strategic Management Journal, 30: 425–45.
Gond, J.-P. & Matten, D. 2007. Rethinking the business-society interfact: Beyond the functionalist trap ICCSR Research Paper Series No. 47-2007. Nottingham.
Gond, J.-P., Palazzo, G.& Basu, K. 2009. Reconsidering instrumental corporate social responsibility through the Mafia metaphor. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19: 5785.
Goodpaster, K.E. 1985. Business ethics, ideology, and thenaturalistic fallacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 4: 227–32.
Goodpaster, K.E. 2010. Corporate responsibility and its constituents In Brenkert, G.G. & Beauchamp, T.L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics. 127–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, S. 1991. The history and philosophy of social science London. Routledge.
Grant, R.W., & Keohane, R.O. 2005. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics American Political Science Review, 99: 2143.
Green, R.M., & Donovan, A. 2010. The methods of business ethics. In Brenkert, G.G., & Beauchamp, T.L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics, 2145.
Greening, D.W., & Turban, D.B. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39: 254–80.
Hahn, F.H. & Hollis, M. 1979. Philosophy and economic theory. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Harris, J.D., & Freeman, R.E. 2008. The impossibility of the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18: 541–48.
Hart, S.L. 1995. A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20: 9861014.
Heal, G. 2005. Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice,
Hempel, C.G., & Oppenheim, P. 1948. Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15: 135–75.
Henderson, D. 2001. Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues: What's the bottom line. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125–39.<125::AID-SMJ150/>3.0.CO;2-H
Hillman, A.J., Keim, G.D., & Schuler, D. 2004. Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30: 837–57.
Hoffman, W.M. 1991. Business and environmental ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1: 169–84.
Hollis, M. 1994. The philosophy of social science: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Homann, K. 1999. Die Relevanz der Ökonomik fürdie Implementation ethischer Zielsetzungen In Baumgartner, A.Franz, H. & Genosko, J. (Eds.), Handbuch der Wirtschaftsethik, Vol.1: Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
Homann, K. 2002. Ökonomik: Fortsetzung der Ethik mit anderen Mitteln In Lütge, C. (Ed.), Vorteile und Anreize, 243–66. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Homann, K. 2007. Globalisation from a business ethics point of view In Homann, K. & Christoph, L. (Eds.), Globalisation and business ethics, 310. Alder-shot: Ashgate.
Homann, K. & Blome-Drees, F. 1992. Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht.
Homann, K. & Pies, I. 1994. Wirtschaftsethik in der Moderne: Zur ökonomischen Theorie der Moral. Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, 5: 314.
Ingram, P., & Clay, K. 2000. The choice-within-constraints new institutionalism and implicationsfor sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 525.
Jensen, M.C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12: 235–56.
Kekes, J. 1984. “Ought implies can” and twokinds of morality. The Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 459–67.
Kenny, A.J. 1966. Practical inference. Analysis, 26: 6575.
Keynes, J.N. 1917. The scope and method of political economy (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.
King, A.A.Lenox, M.J. & Terlaak, A. 2005. The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 10911106.
King, B.G., & Soule, A. 2007. Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 413–42.
Kish-Gephart, J.J., Harrison, D.A., & Treviño, L.K. 2010. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 131.
Klassen, R.D., & Whybark, D.C. 1999. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 599615.
Kurucz, E.C., Colbert, B.A., & Wheeler, D. 2008. The business case for corporate social responsibility. In Cranen, A.McWilliams, A.Matten, D. & Moon, J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, 83112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lange, D., Lee, P.M., & Dai, Y. 2011. Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management, 37: 153–84.
Laufer, W.S. 2003. Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics 43: 253–61.
Lazear, E.P. 2000. Economic imperialism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 99146.
Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. 2010. Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 182200.
Littlejohn, C. 2009. “Ought,” “can,” and practical reasons. American Philosophical Quarterly, 46: 363–72.
Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 115 –36.
Luce, R.A., Barber, A.E., & Hillman, A.J. 2001. Good deeds and misdeeds: A mediated model of the effect of corporate social performance on organizational attractiveness. Business & Society, 40: 397415.
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. 2010. Global value chains, local collective action and corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical evidence. Business Strategy & the Environment, 19: 113.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C.B. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, andmarket value. Journal of Marketing, 70: 118.
Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B., & Barney, J.B. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32: 817 –35.
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. 2001. People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268305.
Marquis, C., Glynn, M.A., & Davis, G.F. 2007. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32: 925 –45.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. 2008. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33: 404 –24.
Maxwell, J.W., Lyon, T.P., & Hackett, S.C. 2000. Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics, 43: 583618.
Mayer, T. 1999. The domain of hypotheses and the realism of assumptions. Journal of Economic Methodology, 6: 319 –30.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 117 –27.
Menger, C. 1985. Investigations into the method of the social sciences with special reference to economics. New York: New York University Press.
Messick, D.M. 1999. Alternative logics for decision making in social settings. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39: 1128.
Misangyi, V.F., Weaver, G.R., & Elms, H. 2008. Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33: 750 –70.
Montgomery, D.B., & Ramus, C.A. 2007. Including corporate social responsibility, environmental sustainability, and ethics in calibrating MBA job preferences. Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 1981 Stanford.
Moore, G.E. 1903/1993. Principia ethica: (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mothersill, M. 1962. Anscombe’s account of the practical syllogism. The Philosophical Review, 71: 44861.
Navarro, P. 1988. Why do corporations give to charity?. Journal of Business, 61: 6593.
Nussbaum, M.C. 1985. Aristotle’s de motu animalium. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
O’Neill, J. 1988. Self-love, self-interest and the rational economic agent. Analyse & Kritik, 20: 184204.
Orlitzky, M. 2011. Institutional logics in the study of organizations: The social construction of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21: 409 –44.
Peloza, J. 2006. Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48: 5272.
Pies, I., Hielscher, S., & Beckmann, M. 2009. Moral commitments and the societal role of business: An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19: 375401.
Portney, P.R. 2008. The (not so) new corporate social responsibility: An empirical perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2: 261 –75.
Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. 2005. Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms' regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49: 235 –48.
Reinhardt, F.L., & Stavins, R.N. 2010. Corporate social responsibility, business strategy, and the environment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26: 164 –81.
Reinhardt, F.L., Stavins, R.N., & Vietor, R.H.K. 2008. Corporate social responsibility through an economic lens. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2: 219 –39.
Riordan, C.M., Gatewood, R.D., & Barnes, B. 1997. Corporate image: Employees reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 16: 401 –12.
Roberts, J. 2003. The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 10: 249 –65.
Sacconi, L. 2011. A Rawlsian view of CSR and the game theory of its implementation (part 1): The multistakeholder model of corporate governance. In Sacconi, L.Blair, M.Freeman, R.E. & Vercelli, A. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: The contribution of economic theory and related disciplines: 157. London: Palgrave.
Scherer, A.G., & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32: 10961120.
Scherer, A.G., & Palazzo, G. 2008. Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In Crane, A.Mc-Williams, A.Matten, D.Moon, J. & Siegel, D.S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: 41331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scherer, A.G., & Palazzo, G. 2011. The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 899931.
Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. 2006. Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 505 –32.
Schuler, D.A., & Christmann, P. 2011. The effectiveness of market-based social governance schemes: The case of fair trade coffee. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21: 133 –56.
Schwartz, M.S., & Carroll, A.B. 2008. Integrating and unifying competing and complementary frameworks: The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business & Society, 47: 148 –86.
Siegel, D.S. 2009. Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/ strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 516.
Siemens, AG 2012. Collective Action.
Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Wai Fong, C. 2009. Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Accounting Review, 84: 937 –67.
Sison, A.J.G. 2008. Corporate governance and ethics: An Aristotelian perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Solomon, R.C. 2002. Business ethics and virtue. In Frederick, R.A. (Ed.), A companion to business ethics: 3037. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stoeckl, N. 2004. The private costs and benefits of environmental self-regulation: Which firms have most to gain? Business Strategy and the Environment, 13: 135 –55.
Streumer, B. 2007. Reasons and impossibility Philosophical Studies, 136: 351 –84.
Suchanek, A. 2001. Ökonomische Ethik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Suchanek, A. 2004. What is meant by consent? In van Aaken, A.List, C. & Luetge, C. (Ed.), Deliberation and decision: A dialogue between economics, constitutional theory, and deliberative democracy: 169 –80. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Swanson, D.L. 1995. Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20: 4364.
Thornton, M.T. 1982. Aristotelian practical reason. Mind, 91: 5776.
Transparency International. 2008. Policy position #5/2008: Enhancing revenue transparency in oil & gas company reporting. Berlin: Transparency International.
Transparency International. 2009. Business principles for countering bribery: A multi-stakeholder initia-tive led by Transparency International (2nd ed.). Berlin: Transparency International.
Treviño, L.K., & Weaver, G.R. 1994. Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two?. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 113 –28.
Treviño, L.K., Weaver, G.R., & Reynolds, S.J. 2006. Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32: 951 –90.
Ulrich, P. 2009. Integrative economic ethics: Foundations of a civilized market economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Aaken, D., Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. 2013. Why do corporate actors engage in pro-social activities? A Bourdieusian approach to corporate social responsibility. Organization. In press.
van Oosterhout, J.H. 2010. The role of corporations in shaping the global rules of the game: In search of new foundations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20: 253 –64.
Vanberg, V.J. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and the “game of catallaxy”: The perspective of constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 18: 199222.
Vanberg, V.J., & Buchanan, J.M. 1988. Rational choice and moral order. Analyse & Kritik, 10: 138 –60.
Vogel, D.J. 2005. The market for virtue:. The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
von Wright, G.H. 1963. Practical inference. The Philosophical Review, 72: 159 –79.
von Wright, G.H. 1971. Explanation and understanding New York: Cornell University Press.
Vranas, P.B.M. 2007. CI ought, therefore I can. Philosophical Studies, 136: 167216.
Wicks, A.C., & Freeman, R.E. 1988. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9: 123 –40.
Williams, O.F. 2004. The UN global compact: The challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14: 755 –74.
Windsor, D. 2001. The future of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9: 225 –56.
Windsor, D. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 93114.
Wood, D.J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16: 691718.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Positive Economics and the Normativistic Fallacy: Bridging the Two Sides of CSR

  • Philipp Schreck (a1), Dominik van Aaken (a1) and Thomas Donaldson (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.