Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:21:44.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Promoting Honesty in Negotiation: An Exercise in Practical Ethics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Peter C. Cramton  and
J. Gregory Dees
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a competitive and morally imperfect world, business people are often faced with serious ethical challenges. Harboring suspicions about the ethics of others, many feel justified in engaging in less-than-ideal conduct to protect their own interests. The most sophisticated moral arguments are unlikely to counteract this behavior. We believe that this morally defensive behavior is responsible, in large part, for much undesirable deception in negotiation. Drawing on recent work in the literature of negotiations, we present some practical guidance on how negotiators might build trust, establish common interests, and secure credibility for their statements, thereby promoting honesty. We also point out the types of social and institutional arrangements, many of which have become commonplace, that work to promote credibility, trust, and honesty in business dealings. Our approach is offered not only as a specific response to the problem of deception in negotiation, but as one model of how research in business ethics might offer constructive advice to practitioners.

…there is such a gap between how one lives and how one ought to live that anyone who abandons what is done for what ought to be done learns his ruin rather than his preservation …

      —Niccolo Machiavelli

We must make the world honest before we can honestly say to our children that honesty is the best policy.

      —George Bernard Shaw

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 359 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1993 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

We are grateful to Howard Stevenson and Tom Piper for comments, and to the Harvard Business School, the National Science Foundation and the Hoover Institution for support.

References

Abreu, Dilip, David, Pearce and Ennio, Stacchetti: 1986, “Optimal Cartel Equilibria with Imperfect Monitoring,” Journal of Economic Theory 39, 251–269.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George A.: 1970, “The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488–500.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J.: 1974, “Gifts and Exchanges.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 343–362.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
Baiman, Stanley and Barry, Lewis: 1989, “An Experiment Testing the Behavioral Equivalence of Strategically Equivalent Employment Contracts.” Journal of Accounting Research 27, 1–20.Google Scholar
Bhide, Amar and Howard, H. Stevenson: 1990, “Why Be Honest if Honesty Doesn't Pay,” Harvard Business Review. September-October, 121–129.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Paul: 1989, The Predatory Society: Deception in the American Marketplace (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
Boatright, John R. 1992. “Morality in Practice: Dees, Cramton, and Brer Rabbit on a Problem of Applied Ethics,” Business Ethics Quarterly. 2, 63–73.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J.: 1990, Negotiation Games: Applying Game Theory to Bargaining and Arbitration (Foundation Press, New York).Google Scholar
Carr, Albert Z.: 1968, “Is Business Bluffing Ethical?” Harvard Business Review. January-February, 143–159.Google Scholar
Chandler, R.: 1955, The Little Sister (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick, and Thomas, D. Feehan: 1977, “The Intent to Deceive,” Journal of Philosophy 74, 143–159.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S.: 1990, Foundations of Social Theory (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Cramton, Peter C.: 1992, “Strategic Delay in Bargaining with Two-Sided Uncertainty,” Review of Economic Studies, 59, 205–225.Google Scholar
Cramton, Peter, Robert, Gibbons, and Paul, Klemperer: 1987, “Dissolving a Partnership Efficiently,” Econometrica 55, 615–632.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha: 1988, “Trust as a Commodity.” In Diego, Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford).Google Scholar
Dees, J. Gregory, and Peter, C. Cramton: 1991, “Shrewd Bargaining on the Moral Frontier: Toward a Theory of Morality in Practice,” Business Ethics Quarterly 1, 135–167.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Morton: 1973, The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes (Yale University Press, New Haven).Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K. and Barry, J. Nalebuff: 1991, Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics, and Everyday Life (W.W. Norton and Company, New York).Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul: 1985, Telling Lies (W. W. Norton and Company, New York).Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai: 1988, The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
Farns worth, E. Allan: 1987, “Precontractual Liability and Preliminary Agreements: Fair Dealing and Failed Negotiations.” Columbia Law Review 87, 218–293.Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger and Scott, Brown: 1988, Getting Together: Building a Relationship that Gets to Yes (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger and William, Ury: 1981, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).Google Scholar
Fried, Charles: 1978, Right and Wrong (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Friedman, James W.: 1971, “A Noncooperative Equilibrium for Supergames,” Review of Economic Studies 38, 1–12.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, Drew: 1992, “Explaining Cooperation and Commitment in Repeated Games.” In Laffont, J. J. (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory: Sixth World Congress (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gambetta, Diego: 1988, “Can We Trust Trust?” In Diego, Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford).Google Scholar
Good, David: 1988, “Individuals, Interpersonal Relations, and Trust.” In Diego, Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford).Google Scholar
Green, Ronald M.: 1988, Religion and Moral Reason: A New Method for Comparative Study (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
Heskett, James L., Earl Sasser, W. Jr.,, and Christopher, W.L. Hart: 1990, Service Breakthroughs: Changing the Rules of the Game (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
Hirschleifer, Jack: 1982, “Evolutionary Models in Economics and Law: Cooperation versus Conflict Strategies.” In Rubin, P. H. and Zerbe, R. O. Jr., eds., Research in Law and Economics 4, 1–60, (JAI Press, Greenwich).Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O.: 1984, “Against Parsimony: Three Easy Ways of Complicating Some Categories of Economic Discourse.” American Economic Review Proceedings 74, 88–96.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, Bengt: 1979, “Moral Hazard and Observability,” Bell Journal of Economics 10, 74–91.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1751. An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals. References are to the 1975 edition (Clarendon Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory S.: 1984, “The Reconciliation Project.” In Copp, D. and Zimmerman, D. (eds.), Morality, Reason, and Truth (Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa).Google Scholar
Kennan, John, and Robert, Wilson: 1993, “Bargaining with Private Information,” Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 45–104.Google Scholar
Kreps, David M.: 1990, “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory.” In James, Alt and Kenneth, Shepsle (ed.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 90–143.Google Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T.: 1985, “Contract Law and the State of Nature,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1, 5–32.Google Scholar
Lax, David A. and Sebenius, James K.: 1986, The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
Lewicki, Roy J. and Joseph, A. Litterer: 1985, Negotiation (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood).Google Scholar
Lindskold, Svenn: 1978, “Trust Development, the GRIT Proposal, and the Effects of Conciliatory Acts on Conflict and Cooperation.” Psychological Bulletin 85, 772–793.Google Scholar
March, Robert M.: 1989, The Japanese Negotiator .Subtlety and Strategy Beyond Western Logic (Kodansha International, Tokyo).Google Scholar
Maser, Steven M. and Coleman, Jules L.: 1989, “A Bargaining Theory Approach to Default Provisions and Disclosure Rules in Contract Law,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 12, 637–709.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger B. and Mark, A. Satterthwaite: 1983, “Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading,” Journal of Economic Theory 28, 265–281.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas: 1975, “Comment.” In Phelps, E. S. (ed.), Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
Pearce, David: 1992, “Repeated Games: Cooperation and Rationality.” In Laffont, J. J. (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory: Sixth World Congress (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Porter, Robert H.: 1983, “Optimal Cartel Trigger Price Strategies,” Journal of Economic Theory 29, 313–338.Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard: 1982, The Art and Science of Negotiation: How to Resolve Conflicts and Get the Best Out of Bargaining (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Ring, Peter Smith and Andrew, Van de Ven: 1989, “Formal and Informal Dimensions of Transactions.” In Andrew, H. Van de Ven, Harold, L. Angle, and Marshall, Scott Poole (ed.), Research on the Management of Innovation (Ballinger Publishing Company, New York).Google Scholar
Rubin, Jeffrey Z. and Bert, R. Brown: 1975, The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya: 1977, “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, 317–344.Google Scholar
Shell, G. Richard: 1991a, “When Is It Legal to Lie in Negotiations?” Sloan Management Review Spring: 93–101.Google Scholar
Shell, G. Richard: 1991b, “Opportunism and Trust in the Negotiation of Commercial Contracts: Toward a New Cause of Action.” Vanderbilt Law Review 44, 221–282.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Reprinted in 1976 (Liberty Classics, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
Sobel, Joel: 1985, “A Theory of Credibility,” Review of Economic Studies, 52, 557–574.Google Scholar
Thompson, Leigh: 1990, “An Examination of Naive and Experienced Negotiators,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, 82–90.Google Scholar
White, James J.: 1980, “Machiavelli and the Bar: Ethical Limitations on Lying in Negotiation,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1980, 926–934.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert: 1983, “Auditing: Perspectives from Multiperson Decision Theory,” Accounting Review 58, 305–318.Google Scholar
Zucker, Lynne G.: 1986, “The Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure.” Research in Organizational Behavior 8, 53–111.Google Scholar