Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Stakeholder Capability Enhancement as a Path to Promote Human Dignity and Cooperative Advantage

  • Michelle K. Westermann-Behaylo (a1), Harry J. Van Buren (a2) and Shawn L. Berman (a2)
Abstract:

Promoting dignity is at the heart of the human capability approach to development. We introduce the concept of stakeholder capability enhancement, beginning with a discussion of the capability approach to development proposed by Sen (1985) and further advanced by Nussbaum (1990) to incorporate notions of dignity. Thereafter follows a review of the literature on value creation stakeholder management and convergent stakeholder theory (Freeman, 1984; Freeman, Harrison, Wicks, Palmer, & DeColle, 2010; Harrison & Wicks, 2013; Jones & Wicks, 1999), as the foundation for our concept of stakeholder capability enhancement. The remainder of this article develops a model that integrates stakeholder management with the human capability approach to detail the cooperative advantage that accrues to business and its stakeholders, as well as the gains in social wellbeing and dignity, when stakeholder capability enhancement becomes a common enterprise strategy. The model also explores the risks and boundary conditions firms face when seeking to profit from stakeholder capability tradeoffs. In explaining the model, we explore normative responsibilities and consequences with regard to human capabilities and dignity. We conclude with implications for future research.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Stakeholder Capability Enhancement as a Path to Promote Human Dignity and Cooperative Advantage
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Stakeholder Capability Enhancement as a Path to Promote Human Dignity and Cooperative Advantage
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Stakeholder Capability Enhancement as a Path to Promote Human Dignity and Cooperative Advantage
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Bartelheimer, P., Leßmann, O & Matiaske, W. 2012. The Capability Approach: A New Perspective for Labor Market and Welfare Policies. Management Revue, 23(2): 9197.
Benhabib, S. 1986. The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and feminist theory in feminism as critique. Praxis International, 5(4): 402424.
Bertland, A. 2008. Virtue ethics in business and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1): 2532.
Bonvini, J. M., Dif-Pradalier, M., & Moachon, E. 2013. A capability approach to restructuring processes: Lessons from a Swiss and a French case study. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4): 382396.
Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. 2009. Stakeholders, reciprocity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 447456.
Brandenburger, A., & Stuart, H. 1996. Value-based business strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 5(1): 524.
Brenner, S. N., & Cochran, P. 1991. The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications tor Business and society theory and research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Business and Society. Sundance, UT.
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. 2014. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107125.
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. 2016. Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 229251.
Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. 2012. Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4): 467480.
Cebreros, K., & Ganes-Chase, J. 2008. Sustainability in the coffee industry: Getting to the next level. Presentation at the 97th Annual Convention of the NCAUSA, March.
Clark, D. A. 2002. Visions of development: A study of human values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Daily Monitor . 2014. Treat employees as valuable assets. November 25.
De George, R. T. 1994. International business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(1): 19.
De Munck, J., & Ferreras, I. 2013. Restructuring processes and capability for voice: Case study of Volkswagen, Brussels. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4): 397412.
D’Orazio, D. 2016. Apple Music reportedly approaches half as many paid subscribers as Spotify. The Verge. http://www.theverge.com/2016/1/10/10745630/apple-music-total-paid-subscribers-vs-spotify, accessed January 27, 2016.
Fehr, E., & Falk, A. 2002a. Psychological foundations of incentives (Joseph Schumpeter Lecture). European Economic Review, 46(4): 687724.
Fehr, E., & Falk, A. 2002b. Reciprocal fairness, cooperation and limits to competition. In Fullbrook, E. (Ed.), Intersubjectivity in economics: Agents and structures: 2842. London: Routledge.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. 2002. Why social preferences matter – The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Economic Journal, 112(478): C1C33.
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. 2002. Strong reciprocity, human cooperation and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1): 125.
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. 1998. Reciprocity and economics: The economic implications of homo reciprocans. European Economic Review, 42(3): 845860.
Fortune . 2010. Wegmans Food Market. February 8: 6.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. 2011. Some thoughts on the development of stakeholder theory. In Phillips, R. A. (Ed.), Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects: 212233. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. 2007. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & DeColle, S. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3): pp. 88106.
Gagnon, S., & Cornelius, N. 2000. Re-examining workplace equality: The capabilities approach. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(4): 6887.
Gandolfi, F. 2014. Why do firms downsize? Journal of Management Research, 14(1): 314.
Gasper, D. 1997. Sen’s capability approach and Nussbaum’s capabilities ethic. Journal of International Development, 9(2): 281302.
Giovanola, B. 2009. Re-thinking the anthropological and ethical foundation of economics and business: Human richness and capabilities enhancement. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3): 431444.
Greenwood, M., & Anderson, E. 2009. I used to be an employee but now I am a ‘stakeholder’: Implications of labeling employees as stakeholders. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47(2): 186200.
Hahn, T. 2015. Reciprocal stakeholder behavior: A motive-based approach to implementation of normative stakeholder demands. Business and Society, 54(1): 951.
Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. 1987. Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 369406.
Harrison, J. S., & St. John, C. H. 1996. Managing and partnering with external stakeholders. Academy of Management Perspectives, 10(2): 4660.
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. 2013. Stakeholder theory, value and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 97124.
Jones, T. M., & Felps, W. 2013. Shareholder wealth maximization and social welfare: A utilitarian critique. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2): 207238.
Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 206221.
Kant, I. 1981. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Ellington, J. W. (Tran.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Lambert, M., & Vero, J. 2013. The capability to aspire for continuing training in France. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4): 305325.
Liket, K., & Simaens, A. 2015. Battling the devolution in the research on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(2): 285308.
Logsdon, J. M., & Van Buren, H. J III. 2009. Beyond the proxy vote: Dialogues between shareholder activists and corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1): 353365.
Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. 2002. Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 155187.
López-Andreu, M., & Miquel Verd, J. 2013. Employer strategies, capabilities and career development: two case studies of Spanish service firms. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4): pp. 345361.
McCloskey, D. N. 2010. Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McVea, J. F., & Freeman, R. E. 2005. A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management: How focusing on stakeholders as individuals can bring ethics and entrepreneurial strategy together. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1): 5769.
Nsehe, M. 2012. Africa’s Most Successful Women: Divine Ndhlukula. Forbes. January 20. http://www.forbes.com/sites/mfonobongnsehe/2012/01/20/africas-most-successful-women-divine-ndhlukula/#3d131d803066. Accessed online on July 5, 2015.
Nussbaum, M. 1990. Aristotelian social democracy. In Douglas, B., Mara, G., & Richardson, H. (Eds.), Liberalism and the good: 203252. New York: Routledge.
Nussbaum, M. 1995. Human capabilities, female human beings. In Nussbaum, M. C. & Glover, J. (Eds.), Women, culture and development: 61104. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. 2002. Capabilities and social justice. International Studies Review, 4(2): 123135.
Nussbaum, M. 2003. Capabilities as fundamental entitlement: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2-3): 3359.
Nussbaum, M. 2004. Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice. Oxford Development Studies, 32(1): 318.
Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Nussbaum, M. 2008. Human dignity and political entitlements. In Human dignity and bioethics: Essays commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics: 351380. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
O’Connor, C. 2014. Report: Walmart workers cost taxpayers $6.2 billion in public assistance. Forbes , April 15. http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/04/15/report-walmart-workers-cost-taxpayers-6-2-billion-in-public-assistance/. Accessed August 15, 2014.
Offerman, T. 2002. Hurting hurts more than helping helps. European Economic Review, 46(8): 14231437.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403442.
Palantir. 2015. Palantir philanthropy engineering 2015 annual impact report . https://www.palantir.com/philanthropy-engineering/annual-report/2015/, accessed January 27, 2016.
Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. 2005. CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4): 387401.
Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. 2003. Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(4): 309323.
Phillips, R. A. 1997. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1), 5166.
Phillips, R. A. 2003. Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Pirson, M., & Dierksmeier, C. 2014. Reconnecting management theory and social welfare: A humanistic perspective—Dignity as the missing link . Fordham University Schools of Business Research Paper 2410374.
Reast, J., Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. 2013. Legitimacy-seeking organizational strategies in controversial industries: A case study analysis and a bi-dimensional model. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1): 139153.
Robeyns, I. 2003. Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), 6192.
Ruggie, J. G. 2013. Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32: 10961120.
Sen, A, 1985. Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. 1990. Development as capability expansion. In Griffin, K. & Knight, J. (Eds.), Human development and the international development strategy for the 1990s: 4158. London: Macmillan.
Sen, A. 1993. Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum, M. C. & Sen, A. K. (Eds.), The quality of life: 3053. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
Sen, A. 2002. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shivarajan, S., & Srinivasan, A. 2013. The poor as suppliers of intellectual property: A social network approach to sustainable poverty alleviation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3): 381406.
Smith, M. L., Spence, R., & Rashid, A. T. 2011. Mobile phones and expanding human capabilities. Information Technologies & International Development, 7(3): 7788.
Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. 2013. Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3): 407442.
Strand, R., & Freeman, R. E. 2015. Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1): 6585.
Subramamian, D., Verd, J. M., Vero, J., & Zimmerman, B. 2013. Bringing Sen’s capability approach to work and human resource practices. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4): 292304.
Subramanian, D., & Zimmerman, B. 2013. Training and capabilities in French firms: How work and organisational governance matter. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4): 326344.
Sundaram, A., & Inkpen, A. 2004. The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3): 350363.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509533.
Van Buren, H. J. 2001. If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3): 481499.
Velasquez, M., & Brady, F. 1997. Natural law and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(2): 83107.
Young, I. M. 1997. Asymmetrical reciprocity: On moral respect, wonder, and enlarged thought. In Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy: 3859. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 60
Total number of PDF views: 417 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 680 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 8th November 2016 - 23rd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.