No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Sweatshops, Exploitation, and the Nonworseness Claim
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 June 2022
Abstract
According to the nonworseness claim, it cannot be morally worse to exploit someone than not to interact with them at all when the interaction 1) is mutually beneficial, 2) is voluntary, and 3) has no negative effects on third parties. My aim in this article is to defend the moral significance of exploitation from this challenge. To that end, I develop a novel account of why sweatshop owners have a moral obligation to pay sweatshop workers a nonexploitative wage despite the fact that their relationship is entirely optional. More precisely, I defend two main claims. First, I show that sweatshop owners are morally obligated to pay sweatshop workers a nonexploitative wage even though they have a right not to hire them and even though that will require them to pay sweatshop workers a wage that is higher than the one they voluntarily accepted. Second, I explain why this obligation on the part of sweatshop owners is not defeated by the fact that other individuals not party to the transaction would benefit even more than sweatshop workers from receiving this additional level of pay.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Business Ethics
References
REFERENCES
Arnold, Dennis, and Bowie, Norman E.. 2003. “Sweatshops and Respect for Persons.” Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2): 221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Adam. 2011. “The Nonworseness Claim and the Moral Permissibility of Better-than-Permissible Acts.” Philosophia 39 (2): 237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkey, Brian. 2020. “The Value of Fairness and the Wrong of Wage Exploitation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (3): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkey, Brian. 2021. “Sweatshops, Structural Injustice, and the Wrong of Exploitation: Why Multinational Corporations Have Positive Duties to the Global Poor.” Journal of Business Ethics 169 (1): 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. 1990. “Fairness.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91: 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A 1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elegido, Juan M. 2009. “The Just Price: Three Insights from the Salamanca School.” Journal of Business Ethics 90 (1): 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elegido, Juan M. 2015. “The Just Price as the Price Obtainable in an Open Market.” Journal of Business Ethics 130 (3): 557–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraci, David. 2019. “Wage Exploitation and the Nonworseness Claim: Allowing the Wrong, to Do More Good.” Business Ethics Quarterly 29 (2): 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Benjamin. 2016a. “Exploitation and Disadvantage.” Economics and Philosophy 32 (3): 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Benjamin. 2016b. “The Paradox of Exploitation.” Erkenntnis 81 (5): 951–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Benjamin. 2021. “Are We All Exploiters?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (3): 535–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, Joe. 2019. “The Exploitation Problem.” Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (4): 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kates, Michael. 2019. “Sweatshops, Exploitation, and the Case for a Fair Wage.” Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (1): 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmqvist, Eric. 2017. “Better to Exploit than to Neglect? International Clinical Research and the Non-worseness Claim.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (4): 474–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Chris. 2004. “Wrongful Beneficence: Exploitation and Third World Sweatshops.” Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (3): 320–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Benjamin. 2014. Out of Poverty: Sweatshops in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Benjamin, and Zwolinski, Matt. 2012. “The Ethical and Economic Case against Sweatshop Labor: A Critical Assessment.” Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4): 449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rulli, Tina. 2020. “Conditional Obligations.” Social Theory and Practice 46 (2): 365–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sample, Ruth. 2003. Exploitation: What It Is and Why It’s Wrong. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jeremy. 2008. “Needs Exploitation.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (4): 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jeremy. 2009a. “Efficiency, Equity, and Price Gouging: A Response to Zwolinski.” Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2): 303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jeremy. 2009b. “What’s the Matter with Price Gouging?” Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2): 275–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jeremy. 2013. “Exploitation and Demeaning Choices.” Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 12 (4): 345–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Platz, Jeppe. 2015. “Free Time, Freedom, and Fairness.” Law, Ethics, and Philosophy 5: 47–61.Google Scholar
Vrousalis, Nicholas. 2013. “Exploitation, Vulnerability, and Social Domination.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (2): 131–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, Alan. 1996. Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, Alan. 2011. Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research: Widening the Lens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, Alan, and Zwolinski, Matt. 2015. “Exploitation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/exploitation/.Google Scholar
Zwolinski, Matt. 2007. “Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (4): 689–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwolinski, Matt. 2008. “The Ethics of Price Gouging.” Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3): 347–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar