Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T21:33:29.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Organizational Structure of the Traditional Chinese Firm and its Modern Reform*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Wellington K. K. Chan
Wellington K. K. Chan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of History, Occidental College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whatever economic growth and development took place in nineteenth-century China, it was by no means an expansion highlighted by a commercial and industrial revolution comparable to that which occurred in Great Britain, the United States, and Japan. While many factors accounted for these alternative paths of change, one element was clearly the differing organization of business enterprise. In this essay, Professor Chan examines the organizational structure of the traditional Chinese firm during the nineteenth century. Then he presents two case studies, one of which illustrates how an enterprise developed an innovative strategy of growth based upon traditional Chinese methods, and a second that illustrates how a company wedded western managerial practices to the Chinese model with spectacular results. While it would be dangerous to generalize about the entire Chinese managerial experience from such a limited number of firms, their successful, though divergent paths of development do indeed suggest the role that traditional Chinese organizational methods had in stifling modern development as well as the influence that western practices and techniques would have on China's growth in the early to middle years of the twentieth century.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 56 , Issue 2: East Asian Business History , Summer 1982 , pp. 218 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Feuerwerker, Albert, The Chinese Economy ca. 1870–1911 (Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1969)Google Scholar; Rawski, Evelyn S., Agricultural Change and the Peasant Economy of South China (Cambridge, Mass., 1972)CrossRefGoogle ScholarChen, Fu-mei Chang and Myers, Ramon, “Customary Law and the Economic Growth of China during the Ch'ing Period,” Ch'ing-shih wen-t'i (Problems in Ch'ing History) 3:5 (November 1976), 1–32 and 3:10 (November 1978), 4–27.Google Scholar

2 See, for example, Fairbank, John K., Eckstein, Alexander and Yang, L.S., “Economic Change in Early Modern China: An Analytic Framework,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 9:1 (October 1960), 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; a good summary of the various factors and theories is found in Moulder, Frances V., Japan, China and the Modern World Economy: Toward a Reinterpretation of East Asian Development ca. 1600 to ca. 1918 (Cambridge, England, 1977), 1–23.Google Scholar

3 Strategy and Structure (Cambridge, Mass., 1962) and The Visible Hand (Cambridge, Mass., 1977).

4 Kuei-ch'ang, Wu et al., Chung-kuo shang-yeh hsi-kuan ta-ch'uan (A Complete Handbook on Chinese Commercial Customs) (Shanghai, 1923), section 7, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

5 For a number of such partnership contracts, see Shindai keiyaku monjo shokambun ruishu (A Collection of Contracts of Ch'ing Dynasty), annotated by Yamane Yukio (Taiwan, 1916), esp. 80–83.

6 Chiu Shang-hai Hsieh-ta-hsiang ch'ou-pu shang-tien ti “tien-kuei” (“Company Regulations” of Hsieh-ta-hsiang Piece Goods Company in Former Day Shanghai) (Shanghai, 1966), 6–10, 14; Pei-ching Jui-fu-hsiang (The Jui-fu-hsiang Company of Peking) (Peking, 1959), 41. The 2–3 taels, or approximately 3–4.50 Chinese dollars, in basic monthy wage is an estimate based on several texts. By 1912, Hsieh-ta-hsiang was paying 5 Chinese dollars.

7 Hsieh-ta-hsiang, 67–68; Jui-fu-hsiang, 31–42; Wu Kuei-ch'ang, Chung-kuo shang-yeh, section 4, pp. 1–5.

8 Hamilton, Gary G., “Nineteenth Century Chinese Merchant Associations: Conspiracy or Combination,” Ch'ing-shih wen-t'i (Problems in Ch'ing History) 3:8 (December 1977), 50–71.Google Scholar

9 For an example, see Shindai keiyaku monjo, 156–157.

10 Jui-fu-hsiang, 3–5.

11 Ibid., 3, 9–11, 43, 98.

12 Ibid., 20–22, 41.

13 Ibid., 45–47.

14 Ibid., 43–45.

15 Ibid., 6.

16 Ibid., 46.

17 Ibid., 6.

18 Pollard, Sidney, Genesis of Modern Management: A Study of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain (Cambridge, Mass., 1966), 144–147, 150–151.Google Scholar

19 Jui-fu-hsiang, 52–55.

20 Pollard, Modern Management, 209.

21 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass., 1977), 1–12.Google Scholar

22 The bureaucratic nature of the China Merchants' Steam Navigation Company's organizational structure is discussed in Ku-fan, Li, Chao-shang chü san-ta-an (Three Major Cases involving the China Merchants' Steam Navigation Company) (Shanghai, 1933), 53–55, 137–141.Google Scholar For a general treatment, see Wellington Chan, K.K., Merchants, Mandarins and Modern Enterprise in Late Ch'ing China (Cambridge, Mass., 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Chung-kuo chin-tai kuo-ming ching-chi-shih chiang-i (Lectures on the National Economic History of Modern China) (Peking, 1958), 234, 236.

24 Hsien-shih kung-ssu erh-shih-wu chou-nien chi-nien ts'e (The Sincere Company: Twenty-fifth Anniversary) (Hong Kong, 1925), section on “Record,” 1–3.

25 Hsien-shih kung-ssu, section on “Record,” pp. 3–5, 15–16.

26 Hsien-shih kung-ssu, section on “Shanghai Branch Company.”

27 Hsien-shih kung-ssu, section on “Record,” pp. 5, 9.

28 Hsiang-kang Yung-an yu-hsien kung-ssu erh-shih-wu chou-nien cht-nien lu (The Wing On Company Ltd. of Hong Kong: In Commemoration of the Twenty-fifth Anniversary, 1907–1932) (Hong Kong, 1932).

29 Feuerwerker, Albert, China's Early Industrialization: Sheng Hsuan-huai (1844–1916) and Mandarin Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass., 1958).CrossRefGoogle ScholarLevy, Marion J. Jr, “Contrasting Factors in the Modernization of China and Japan,” in Kuznets, Simon, Moore, W.E., and Spengler, J.J., eds., Economic Growth: Brazil, India, Japan (Durham, 1955).Google Scholar

30 Rawski, Agricultural Changes, 97; Skinner, G. William, “Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China,” Journal of Asian Studies 24:1 (November 1964), 3–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; 24:2 (February 1965), 195–228; (May 1965), 363–399; Moulder, Japan, China and the Modern World Economy, 48–50, 83–84.

31 King, Frank H. H., Concise Economic History of Modern China (New York, 1969), 17–21, 47–50.Google Scholar