Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T10:06:07.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scale and Scope: A Review Colloquium - Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. By Alfred D. ChandlerJr., with Takashi Hikino · Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990. xix + 860 pp. Charts, figures, tables, appendixes, notes, and index. $35.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2011

Alfred D. Chandler Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Scale and Scope, Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., sets out a complex and sustained interpretation of “the dynamics of industrial capitalism.” His work, the culmination of decades of study, spanning three major economies (the United States, Great Britain, and Germany) from the 1880s to the 1940s, will undoubtedly be a central point of reference for all business historians for a very long time to come. More than that, it also makes contributions to, and has wide implications for, a great variety of fields of scholarship, research, and debate. It is hard to imagine any single book review that could do justice to the scale and the scope of Chandler's work.

Type
Review Colloquium
Information
Business History Review , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , Winter 1990 , pp. 690 - 735
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Scherer, F. M., et al. , The Economics of Multi-Plant Operation: An International Comparisons Study (Cambridge, Mass., 1975)Google Scholar.

2 Sands, Saul S., “Changes in Scale of Production in United States Manufacturing Industry, 1904-1947,” Review of Economics and Statistics 43 (Nov. 1961): 365–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See Mokyr, Joel, The Lever of Power: Technical Creativity and Economic Progress (New York, 1990), 1–2Google Scholar. For a graphical illustration, see my “Economies of Scale and Industrial Concentration” in Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, ed. Goldschmid, Harvey J., et al. (Boston, 1974), 21Google Scholar.

4 Scherer, et al., The Economics of Multi-Plant Operation, 49-56 and 295-321.

5 Baldwin, John R. and Gorecki, Paul K., “The Relationship between Plant Scale and Product Diversity in Canadian Manufacturing Industries,” Journal of Industrial Economics 34 (June 1986): 373–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Statistical Report: Annual Line of Business Report, 1977 (Washington, D.C., April 1985)Google Scholar.

7 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass., 1977), 280Google Scholar.

8 Passer, Harold C., The Electrical Manufacturers, 1875-1900: A Study in Competition, Entrepreneurship, Technical Change, and Economic Growth (Cambridge, Mass., 1953), 34-40, 14-21, 42, and 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

1 Burch, Philip, The Managerial Revolution Reassessed (Lexington, Mass., 1972)Google Scholar.

2 Lewchuk, Wayne, “Motor Vehicles” in Decline of the British Economy, ed. Elbaum, W. Bernard and Lazonick, William (New York, 1986), 135–61Google Scholar, and in greater detail Lewchuk, Wayne, “The Return to Capital in the British Motor Vehicle Industry, 1896-1939” Business History 27 (1985): 3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Seltzer, L. M., A Financial History of the American Automobile Industry (Cambridge, Mass., 1928): 36–63Google Scholar.

4 Williamson, Oliver, “The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes,” Journal of Economic Literature 19 (1981): 1537–68Google Scholar; Monsen, K. J.and Downs, A., “The Behavior of the Large Managerial Firm,”Journal of Political Economy 3 (1965): 221–236Google Scholar; Marris, Robin and Mueller, D., “The Corporation, Competition, and the Visible Hand” Journal of Economic Literature 18 (1980): 36–63Google Scholar.

5 Sanderson, J. M., The Universities and British Industry, 1850-1950 (London, 1972)Google Scholar.

6 Locke, Robert, The End of Practical Man (Greenwich, Conn., 1984), 78Google Scholar.

7 Davenport-Hines, R. P. T., Dudley Docker: The Life and Times of a Trade Warrior (Cambridge, England, 1985)Google Scholar.

1 However, Hannes Siegrist has produced more detailed and more complete lists on the hundred largest enterprises in German manufacturing and mining in 1887, 1907, and 1927 (on the basis of nominal capital, including the large personal enterprises). Cf. the tables in Horn, Norbert and Kocka, Jürgen, eds., Law and the Formation of the Big Enterprises in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries (Göttingen, 1979), 98–112Google Scholar, and Siegrist, Hannes, “Deutsche Grossunternehmen vom späten 19. Jahrhundert bis zur Weimarer Republik,” in Geschichte und Gesellschaft 6 (1980): 60–102, esp. 93-102Google Scholar.

2 As Chandler knows, this reconfirms the notion of “organized capitalism” developed in a more sweeping way in a controversial debate that started in the early 1970s. Cf. Winkler, H. A., ed., Organisierter Kapitalismus (Göttingen, 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 This was done, for example, in Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., and Herman Daems, “Administrative Coordination, Allocation and Monitoring: Concepts and Comparisons,” in Horn and Kocka, eds., Law and the Formation of the Big Enterprises, 28-54.

4 The Gerschenkronian idea is not incompatible with Chandler's analysis. Cf. J. Kocka and H. Siegrist, “Die hundert grossten deutschen Industrieunternehmen im späten 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhundert: Expansion, Diversifikation und Integration im internationalen Vergleich,” in Ibid., 91-95.

5 Ibid., 84. Also see appendix C.4 in Scale and Scope, 722-32.

1 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., “The United States: Seedbed of Managerial Capitalism,” in Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise, ed. Chandler, and Daems, Herman (Cambridge, Mass., 1980), 14Google Scholar.

1 Amsden, Alice H., Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization (New York, 1989), 8, 9Google Scholar.