Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-hcvhd Total loading time: 5.847 Render date: 2021-04-20T07:43:21.572Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Cave Art, Autism, and the Evolution of the Human Mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Nicholas Humphrey
Affiliation:
Graduate Faculty New School for Social Research 65 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10003, USA

Abstract

The emergence of cave art in Europe about 30,000 years ago is widely believed to be evidence that by this time human beings had developed sophisticated capacities for symbolization and communication. However, comparison of the cave art with the drawings made by a young autistic girl, Nadia, reveals surprising similarities in content and style. Nadia, despite her graphic skills, was mentally defective and had virtually no language. I argue in the light of this comparison that the existence of the cave art cannot be the proof which it is usually assumed to be that the humans of the Upper Palaeolithic had essentially ‘modern’ minds.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Bégouin, R. & Clottes, J., 1991. Portable and wall art in the Volp caves, Montesquieu-Avantès, (Ariège). Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 57(1), 6580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M., 1985. From cognition to ideology, in Power and Knowledge: Anthropological and Sociological Approaches, ed. Fardon, R.. Edinburgh: Scottish University Press, 2148.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Menozzi, P. & Piazza, A., 1994. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Charman, T. & Baron-Cohen, S., 1993. Drawing development in autism: the intellectual to visual realism shift. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 11, 171–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clottes, J., 1996a. Epilogue to Dawn of Art: the Chauvet Cave, by Chauvet, J.-M., Deschamps, E.B. & Hilaire, C.. New York (NY): Harry N. Abrams Inc.Google Scholar
Clottes, J., 1996b. Thematic changes in Upper Palaeolithic art: a view from the Grotte Chauvet. Antiquity 70, 276–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnton, R., 1985. The Great Cat Massacre. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Deacon, T.W., 1997. The Symbolic Species: the Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York (NY): Norton.Google Scholar
Dennett, D., 1992. Consciousness Explained. New York (NY): Little Brown.Google Scholar
Dennett, D., 1996. Kinds of Minds. New York (NY): Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R., 1996. Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eames, K. & Cox, M.V., 1994. Visual realism in the drawings of autistic, Down's syndrome and normal children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 12, 235–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fein, D., Lucci, D. & Waterhouse, L., 1990. Brief report: fragmented drawings in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 20, 263–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, U. & Happé, F., 1994. Autism: beyond ‘theory of mind’. Cognition 50, 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, C., 1982. Interaction and alliance in Palaeolithic society. Man 17, 92107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golomb, C. & Schmeling, J., 1996. Drawing development in autistic and mentally retarded children. Visual Arts Research 22, 518.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E.H., 1960. Art and Illusion. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E.H., 1996. The miracle at Chauvet. New York Review of Books 14 (11), 812.Google Scholar
Hadingham, E., 1979. Secrets of the Ice Age. New York (NY): Walker.Google Scholar
Happé, F., Ehlers, S., Fletcher, P., Frith, U., Johansson, M., Gillberg, C., Dolan, R., Frackowiak, R. & Frith, C., 1996. Theory of mind in the brain: evidence from a PET scan study of Asperger Syndrome. Neuroreport 8, 197201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermelin, B., Pring, L. & Heavey, L., 1994. Visual and motor functions in graphically gifted savants. Psychological Medicine 24, 673–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphrey, N., 1974. Species and individuals in the perceptual world of monkeys. Perception 3, 105–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keynes, J.M., 1947. Newton the man, in Newton Tercentenary Celebrations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2734.Google Scholar
Knight, C.D., Power, C. & Watts, I., 1995. The human symbolic revolution: a Darwinian account. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 5(1), 75114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1968. The Art of Prehistoric Man in Western Europe. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1991. Lettre-Préface, in L'Art Pariètal Archaïque en Aquitaine, by B., & Delluc, G.. (28e Supplément à Gallia Préhistoire.) Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C., 1981. The Naked Man. (Introduction to a Science of Mythology 4.) London: Cape.Google Scholar
Lewin, R., 1997. Principles of Human Evolution. Malden (MA): Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, V. & Boucher, J., 1991. Skill, content and generative strategies in autistic children's drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 9, 393416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D., 1981. Believing and Seeing. Symbolic Meanings in Southern San Rock Paintings. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D. & Dowson, T.A., 1988. The signs of all times: entoptic phenomena in Upper Palaeolithic art. Current Anthropology 24, 201–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A., 1972. The Roots of Civilization: the Cognitive Beginnings of Man's First Art, Symbol and Notation. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Miller, G., 1998. How mate choice shaped human nature, in Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, eds. Crawford, C. & Krebs, D.. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mithen, S., 1988. Looking and learning: Upper Palaeolithic art and information gathering. World Archaeology 19, 297327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S., 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mithen, S., 1998. Report in New Scientist 9 (05), 16.Google Scholar
Mottron, L. & Belleville, S., 1993. A study of perceptual analysis in a high-level autistic subject with exceptional graphic abilities. Brain and Cognition 23, 279309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, E., 1971. Art and the Creative Unconscious, trans. Manheim, R.. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Newson, E., 1977. Postscript to Nadia: a Case of Extraordinary Drawing Ability in an Autistic Child, by Selfe, L.. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Patel, T., 1996. Stone Age Picassos. New Scientist 13 07, 33–5.Google Scholar
Power, C. & Aiello, L.C., 1997. Female protosymbolic strategies, in Women in Human Evolution, ed. Hager, L.. New York (NY): London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pring, L., Hermelin, B. & Heavey, L., 1995. Savants, segments, art and autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 36, 1065–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacks, O., 1995. Prodigies, in An Anthropologist on Mars, ed.??. London: Picador, 179232.Google Scholar
Scott, F.J. & Baron-Cohen, S., 1996. Imagining real and unreal things: evidence of a dissociation in autism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8, 371–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selfe, L., 1977. Nadia: a Case of Extraordinary Drawing Ability in an Autistic Child. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Selfe, L., 1983. Normal and Anomalous Representational Drawing Ability in Children. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Selfe, L., 1985. Anomalous drawing development: some clinical studies, in Visual Order: the Nature and Development of Pictorial Representation, eds. Freeman, N.H. & Cox, M.V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135–54.Google Scholar
Shah, A. & Frith, U., 1983. An islet of ability in autistic children: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 24, 611–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, A.W. & Thomas, M., 1997. Autistic artists give clues to cognition. Perception 26, 93–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, I., 1998. Becoming Human: Evolution and Human Uniqueness. New York (NY): Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Treffert, D., 1989. Extraordinary People: an Exploration of the Savant Syndrome London: Black Swan.Google Scholar
Watts, I., 1998. The Origin of Symbolic Culture: the Middle Stone Age of Southern Africa and Khoisan Ethnography. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 499 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Cave Art, Autism, and the Evolution of the Human Mind
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Cave Art, Autism, and the Evolution of the Human Mind
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Cave Art, Autism, and the Evolution of the Human Mind
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *