Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Mesopotamian Petrology: Stages in the Classification of the Material World

  • Nicholas Postgate (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 22 December 2008

In the search for cognition in the mute record of archaeology the record of ancient thought transmitted to us by early written texts is an obvious but underexploited resource. An examination of the classification of stones in Mesopotamia gives a rare opportunity to match textual information with the archaeological record, and offers some insights into the organization of thought and classification of knowledge by one of the first literate societies.A group of unshaped stones in the corner of a grave under the floor of a Sumerian dwelling attests to an awareness of natural properties as distinct from functions, whether or not these concepts were already formulated in words. The group of various stones also hints at the concept of a class, the first stirring of a mindset which percolates through Plato and Aristotle to Linnaeus. Already in c. 2000 BC the essential properties of some of these stones were conceptualized and described in a ‘literary’ composition, and the concept of a stable set of properties is linked to traditions relating to the proper source of a stone. Later still, maybe around 1000 BC, the Mesopotamian scribes created a lapidary or ‘Handbook of Stones’ which provides an ordered key to stones in respect of their appearance. Then, or later, the description of their appearance was supplemented by details in which their natural or physical properties were distinguished, along with magical properties some of which were probably transmitted to the Hellenistic world.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. Eluère , 1986. A prehistoric touchstone from France. Gold Bulletin 19, 5861.

A.R. George , 1979. Cuneiform texts in the Birmingham City Museum. Iraq 41, 121–40.

W. Heimpel , 1987. Das Untere Meer. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 77, 2291.

H.V. Hilprecht , 1893. Old Babylonian inscriptions chiefly from Nippur, part I. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 18, 554.

W. Horowitz , 1992. Two Abnu šikinšu fragments and related matters. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 82, 112–22.

J.V. Kinnier Wilson , 1962. The Kurba'il Statue of Shalmaneser III. Iraq 24, 90115.

B. Landsberger , 1965. Tin and lead: the adventures of two vocables. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 24, 285–96.

B. Landsberger , 1967. Über Farben in Sumerisch-Akkadischen. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 21, 139–73.

B. Meissner , 1922. Lexikographische Studien. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 25, 244.

T.F. Potts , 1989. Foreign stone vessels of the late third millennium BC from southern Mesopotamia: their origin and mechanisms of exchange. Iraq 51, 123–64.

E. Reiner , 1956. ‘Lipŝur’ litanies. Journal of Near Eastern studies 15, 129–49.

E. Sollberger , 1965. A new inscription of Ŝilhak-Inŝuŝinak. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 19, 31–2.

P. Steinkeller , 1982. The question of Marhaŝi: a contribution to the historical geography of Iran in the third millennium BC. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 72, 237–65.

P. Steinkeller , 1987. The stone ‘pirig-gùn’. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 77, 92–5.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Archaeological Journal
  • ISSN: 0959-7743
  • EISSN: 1474-0540
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-archaeological-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *