Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:34:07.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Testing the ‘Three Stages of Trance’ Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2003

Patricia A. Helvenston
Affiliation:
1407 North Aztec Street, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA; patscholar@aol.com.
Paul G. Bahn
Affiliation:
428 Anlaby Road, Hull, HU3 6QP, UK; pgbahn@anlabyrd.karoo.co.uk.
John L. Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Victoria 3800, Australia; j.l.bradshaw@med.monash.edu.au.
Christopher Chippindale
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DZ, UK; cc43@cam.ac.uk. Rock Art Research Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa. School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia.

Abstract

In October of 2002, Patricia A. Helvenston and Paul G. Bahn published a paper entitled ‘Desperately Seeking Trance Plants: Testing the “Three Stages of Trance” Model’. That paper presented a critique of the ‘Three Stages of Trance’ model as proposed by J.D. Lewis-Williams and T.A. Dowson in 1988 to account for mental imagery as perceived by people in ‘certain altered states of consciousness’ that they believed inspired Palaeolithic cave art. Helvenston & Bahn chose to publish their paper privately, but supplied the following summary of their argument. It is accompanied here by comments from a neuropsychologist (John L. Bradshaw) and a rock-art specialist (Christopher Chippindale).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2003 The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)