Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-k78ct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-24T23:24:31.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

KILLING TWO BIRDS WITH ONE STONE? THE COURT OF JUSTICE'S OPINION ON THE EU'S ACCESSION TO THE ECHR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2015

Get access

Extract

ACCESSION to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) has long been on the EU's political agenda. The EU's membership of the ECHR is not only seen as symbolically significant, but is also aimed at filling an important gap in the enforceability of human rights across Europe. At present, the EU cannot be brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and, while all EU Member States are parties to the ECHR, as long as the EU protects fundamental rights to a standard equivalent to that required under the ECHR, Member States cannot be held responsible for alleged violations of the Convention resulting from EU law either (Bosphorus v Ireland (2006) 42 E.H.R.R. 1).

Type
Case and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)