Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2017
Electronic health records (EHRs) offer significant advantages over paper charts, such as ease of portability, facilitated communication, and a decreased risk of medical errors; however, important ethical concerns related to patient confidentiality remain. Although legal protections have been implemented, in practice, EHRs may be still prone to breaches that threaten patient privacy. Potential safeguards are essential, and have been implemented especially in sensitive areas such as mental illness, substance abuse, and sexual health. Features of one institutional model are described that may illustrate the efforts to both ensure adequate transparency and ensure patient confidentiality. Trust and the therapeutic alliance are critical to the provider–patient relationship and quality healthcare services. All of the benefits of an EHR are only possible if patients retain confidence in the security and accuracy of their medical records.
2. Mearian, L. Update: Hacker puts 9.3M U.S. patient records up for sale. available at http://www.computerworld.com/article/3088907/security/hacker-selling-655-000-patient-records-from-3-hacked-healthcare-organizations.html (last accessed 28 June 2016).
3. Akpan N. Has health care hacking become an epidemic? March 23, 2016; available at http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/has-health-care-hacking-become-an-epidemic (last accessed 29 Nov 2016).
5. New York Education Law 6530(32)
8. Hennessy-Fiske M. UCLA hospitals to pay $865,500 for breaches of celebrities’ privacy. Los Angeles Times, July 8, 2011.
9. Caine K, Hanania R. Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013;20:7–15.
Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.