Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Conscientious Non-objection in Intensive Care

Abstract:
Abstract:

Discussions of conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare often concentrate on objections to interventions that relate to reproduction, such as termination of pregnancy or contraception. Nevertheless, questions of conscience can arise in other areas of medicine. For example, the intensive care unit is a locus of ethically complex and contested decisions. Ethical debate about CO usually concentrates on the issue of whether physicians should be permitted to object to particular courses of treatment; whether CO should be accommodated. In this article, I focus on the question of how clinicians ought to act: should they provide or support a course of action that is contrary to their deeply held moral beliefs? I discuss two secular examples of potential CO in intensive care, and propose that clinicians should adopt a norm of conscientious non-objection (CNO). In the face of divergent values and practice, physicians should set aside their personal moral beliefs and not object to treatment that is legally and professionally accepted and provided by their peers. Although there may be reason to permit conscientious objections in healthcare, conscientious non-objection should be encouraged, taught, and supported.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Conscientious Non-objection in Intensive Care
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Conscientious Non-objection in Intensive Care
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Conscientious Non-objection in Intensive Care
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S Chow , R Chow , M Popovic , M Lam , M Popovic , J Merrick , et al. A selected review of the mortality rates of neonatal intensive care units. Frontiers in Public Health 2015;3:225.

CL Sprung , SL Cohen , P Sjokvist , M Baras , HH Bulow , S Hovilehto , et al. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: The Ethicus Study. JAMA 2003;290(6):790–7;

MS Fontana , C Farrell , F Gauvin , J Lacroix , A Janvier . Modes of death in pediatrics: differences in the ethical approach in neonatal and pediatric patients. Journal of Pediatrics 2013;162(6):1107–11.

E Azoulay , JF Timsit , CL Sprung , M Soares , K Rusinova , A Lafabrie , et al. Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the conflicus study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2009;180(9):853–60.

EB Tapper , CJ Vercler , D Cruze , W Sexson . Ethics consultation at a large urban public teaching hospital. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2010;85(5):433–8.

A Catlin , C Armigo , D Volat , E Vale , MA Hadley , W Gong , et al. Conscientious objection: A potential neonatal nursing response to care orders that cause suffering at the end of life? Study of a concept. Neonatal Network 2008;27(2):101–8.

DJ Wilkinson , RD Truog . The luck of the draw: Physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making in intensive care. Intensive Care Medicine 2013;39(6):1128–32.

NM Mark , SG Rayner , NJ Lee , JR Curtis . Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: A systematic review. Intensive Care Medicine 2015;41:1572–85.

A Garland , AF Connors . Physicians’ influence over decisions to forego life support. Journal of Palliative Medicine 2007;10(6):1298–305.

M Lewis-Newby , M Wicclair , T Pope , C Rushton , F Curlin , D Diekema , et al. An official American Thoracic Society policy statement: managing conscientious objections in intensive care medicine. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2015;191(2):219–27.

A Jotkowitz , S Glick , AZ Zivotofsky . The case of Samuel Golubchuk and the right to live. American Journal of Bioethics 2010;10(3):50–3.

HH Bulow , CL Sprung , M Baras , S Carmel , M Svantesson , J Benbenishty , et al. Are religion and religiosity important to end-of-life decisions and patient autonomy in the ICU? The Ethicatt study. Intensive Care Medicine 2012;38(7):1126–33.

MJ Edwards , SW Tolle . Disconnecting a ventilator at the request of a patient who knows he will then die: The doctor’s anguish. Annals of Internal Medicine 1992;117(3):254–6.

JJ Paris . Autonomy does not confer sovereignty on the patient: A commentary on the Golubchuk case. American Journal of Bioethics 2010;10(3):54–6.

D Wilkinson , R Truog , J Savulescu . In favour of medical dissensus: Why we should agree to disagree about end-of-life decisions. Bioethics 2016;30(2):109–8.

M Magelssen . When should conscientious objection be accepted? Journal of Medical Ethics 2012;38(1):1821.

MJ Mobley , MY Rady , JL Verheijde , B Patel , JS Larson . The relationship between moral distress and perception of futile care in the critical care unit. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 2007;23(5):256–63.

D Christensen . Disagreement as evidence: The epistemology of controversy. Philosophy Compass 2009;4(5):756–67.

W Alston . Religious diversity and perceptual knowledge of God. Faith and Philosophy 1988;5(4):433–48.

DJC Wilkinson , J Savulescu . Knowing when to stop: Futility in the ICU. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology 2011;24(2):160–5.

N Daniels . Justice, health, and healthcare. American Journal of Bioethics 2001;1(2):216.

J Savulescu . Conscientious objection in medicine. BMJ 2006;332(7536):294–7.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • ISSN: 0963-1801
  • EISSN: 1469-2147
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 41
Total number of PDF views: 223 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 403 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th December 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.