This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
The European politics of animal experimentation: From Victorian Britain to ‘Stop Vivisection’.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account.
Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.
To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account.
Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.
5.GarrettJR. The ethics of animal research: An overview of the debate. In: GarrettJR, ed. The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012:1–15, at 2.
6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “The Nuremberg Code,” Principle 3. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html (last accessed 3 July 2015). The original statement appears in “Judgment.” In: Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Vols. 1 and 2. Military Tribunal. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1948–49.
8.BeecherHK. Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine1966;274:1354–60.
9.ThomasRS, BlackMB, LiL, HealyE, ChuTM, BaoW, et al. A comprehensive statistical analysis of predicting in vivo hazard using high-throughput in vitro screening. Toxicological Sciences2012;128:398–417.
10. He cites the work of an expert panel of toxicologists: OlsonH, BettonG, RobinsonD, ThomasK, MonroA, KolajaG, et al. Concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans and in animals. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology2000;32:56–67.
Disclaimer: DeGrazia’s work on this introduction was supported, in part, by intramural funds from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center. The views expressed are those of the two authors. They do not represent the position or policy of the NIH Department of Bioethics, the NIH, the U.S. Public Health Service, or the Department of Health and Human Services.
Recommend this journal
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.