Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-w58md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-05T05:14:28.060Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English

On the Flight and Host Selection of the Douglas-fir Beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L. H. McMullen  and
M. D. Atkins
L. H. McMullen
Affiliation:
Forest Entomology and Pathology Laboratory, Victoria, B.C.
M. D. Atkins
Affiliation:
Forest Entomology and Pathology Laboratory, Victoria, B.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

The flight of bark beetles covers a short but important period of their life cycle, during which they are exposed to conditions not encountered during the major portion of their life under the bark. The time of flight and the factors which affect it are important, not only to the dispersal and survival of the insect, but also in the interpretation of experimental data dependent upon the beetle's flight activity.

Chapman (1954), Rudinsky and Vité (1956), and Atkins (1959, 1960, 1961) studied the flight of the Douglas-fir beetle under laboratory conditions, but there is scant reference to field studies on the flight of this insect. Chapman and Kinghorn (1958) recorded the number caught in window flight traps near Cowichan Lake, B.C., and unpublished reports describe emergence records obtained from cage studies conducted near Lumby, B.C.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 94 , Issue 12 , December 1962 , pp. 1309 - 1325
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. F. 1948. Host selection by the pine engraver. Jour. Econ. Ent. 41: 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D. 1959. A study of the flight of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). I Flight preparation and response. Can. Ent. 91: 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D. 1960. A study of the flight of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). II Flight movements. Can. Ent. 92: 942–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D. 1961. A study of the flight of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). III Flight capacity. Can. Ent. 93: 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D., and McMullen, L. H.. 1958. Selection of host material by the Douglas-fir beetle. Can. Dept. Agr., For. Biol. Div. Bi-mon. Prog. Rpt. 14(1): 3.Google Scholar
Bedard, W. D. 1950. The Douglas-fir beetle. U. S. Dept. Agr. Circ. No. 817, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1954. Flight of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae in the laboratory. Can. Dept. Agr., For. Biol. Div. Bi-mon. Prog. Rpt. 10(4): 4.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1955. Sex determination by stridulation sound in the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. Can. Dept. Agr., For. Biol. Div. Bi-mon. Prog. Rpt. 11(3): 2.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1962. Field studies on attack flight and log selection by the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 4: 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A., and Kinghorn, J. M.. 1958. Studies of flight and attack activity of the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.), and other scolytids. Can. Ent. 90: 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chararas, C. 1959. L'attractivité exercée par les confères des scolytides et le role des substances turpeniques extraites des oléorésines. Rev. Path. Veg. Ent. Agr. Fr. 38: 113–129.Google Scholar
Gara, R. I., and Vité, J. P.. 1962. Studies on the flight patterns of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in second growth ponderosa pine forests. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21: 275–290.Google Scholar
Graham, K. 1959. Release by flight exercise of a chemotropic response from photopositive domination in a scolytid beetle. Nature 184: 283–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, K., and Werner, A. E.. 1956. Chemical aspects of log selection by ambrosia beetles. Can. Dept. Agr., For. Biol. Div. Bi-mon. Prog. Rpt. 12(1): 3–4.Google Scholar
Hierholzer, O. 1950. Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Orientierung von Ips curvidens Germ. Zeitschr. Tierpsychol. 7: 588–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lejeune, R. R., McMullen, L. H., and Atkins, M. D.. 1961. The influence of logging on Douglas-fir beetle populations. For. Chron. 37: 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullen, L. H., and Atkins, M. D.. 1959. A portable tent cage for entomological field studies. Proc. B. C. Ent. Soc. 56: 67–68.Google Scholar
McMullen, L. H., and Atkins, M. D.. 1961. Intraspecific competition as a factor in the natural control of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). For. Sci. 7: 197–203.Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., and Keen, F. P.. 1960. Biology and control of the western pine beetle. U. S. Dept. Agr. Misc. Publ. 800, 381 pp.Google Scholar
Person, H. L. 1931. Theory in explanation of the selection of certain trees by the western pine beetle. Jour. For. 29: 696–699.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A., and Vité, J. P.. 1956. Effects of temperature upon the activity and behavior of the Douglas-fir beetle. For. Sci. 2: 258–267.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. B. 1959. Termination of diapause in the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), as an aid to continuous laboratory rearing. Can. Ent. 91: 520–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1946. Statistical methods. Iowa State Coll. Press, Ames, Iowa.Google ScholarPubMed
Vité, J. P., and Gara, R. I.. 1961. A field method for observation on olfactory responses of bark beetles (Scolytidae) to volatile materials. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21: 175–182.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Gara, R. I.. 1962. Volatile attractants from ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21: 251–274.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1957. Contribution toward a study of Douglas-fir beetle development. For. Sci. 3: 156–167.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Wood, D. L.. 1961. A study on the applicability of the measurement of oleoresin exudation pressure in determining susceptibility of second growth ponderosa pine to bark beetle infestation. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21: 67–78.Google Scholar
Walters, J. 1956. Biology and control of the Douglas-fir beetle in the interior of British Columbia. Can. Dept. Agr. For. Biol. Div. Publ. 975, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L., and Vité, J. P.. 1961. Studies on the host selection behavior of Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Pinus ponderosa. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21: 79–96.Google Scholar